Cargando…
Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle
Numerous anecdotal accounts and qualitative research studies have reported on post-vaccination menstrual irregularities in women of reproductive age. However, none have quantified the impact. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify and characterize the menstrual irregularit...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9802578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1065421 |
_version_ | 1784861704773959680 |
---|---|
author | Chao, Melissa Jung Menon, Carlo Elgendi, Mohamed |
author_facet | Chao, Melissa Jung Menon, Carlo Elgendi, Mohamed |
author_sort | Chao, Melissa Jung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Numerous anecdotal accounts and qualitative research studies have reported on post-vaccination menstrual irregularities in women of reproductive age. However, none have quantified the impact. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify and characterize the menstrual irregularities associated with vaccination for women of reproductive age. A search on July 20, 2022, retrieved articles published between December 1, 2019, and July 1, 2022, from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The included articles were studies with full texts written in English that reported on menstrual irregularities for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated women of reproductive age. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Study Quality Assessment Tool for Observation Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Four observational studies were included. Review Manager was used to generating a forest plot with odds ratios (ORs) at the 95% confidence interval (CI), finding statistically significant associations between vaccination and menstrual irregularities for 25,054 women of reproductive age (OR = 1.91, CI: 1.76–2.07) with a significant overall effect of the mean (Z = 16.01, p < 0.0001). The studies were heterogeneous with significant dispersion of values (χ(2) = 195.10 at df = 3, p < 0.00001, I(2) = 98%). The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis are limited by the availability of quantitative data. The results have implications for treating women of reproductive age with menstrual irregularities and informing them about the potential side effects of vaccinations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9802578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98025782022-12-31 Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle Chao, Melissa Jung Menon, Carlo Elgendi, Mohamed Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Numerous anecdotal accounts and qualitative research studies have reported on post-vaccination menstrual irregularities in women of reproductive age. However, none have quantified the impact. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify and characterize the menstrual irregularities associated with vaccination for women of reproductive age. A search on July 20, 2022, retrieved articles published between December 1, 2019, and July 1, 2022, from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The included articles were studies with full texts written in English that reported on menstrual irregularities for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated women of reproductive age. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Study Quality Assessment Tool for Observation Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Four observational studies were included. Review Manager was used to generating a forest plot with odds ratios (ORs) at the 95% confidence interval (CI), finding statistically significant associations between vaccination and menstrual irregularities for 25,054 women of reproductive age (OR = 1.91, CI: 1.76–2.07) with a significant overall effect of the mean (Z = 16.01, p < 0.0001). The studies were heterogeneous with significant dispersion of values (χ(2) = 195.10 at df = 3, p < 0.00001, I(2) = 98%). The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis are limited by the availability of quantitative data. The results have implications for treating women of reproductive age with menstrual irregularities and informing them about the potential side effects of vaccinations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9802578/ /pubmed/36590952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1065421 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chao, Menon and Elgendi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Chao, Melissa Jung Menon, Carlo Elgendi, Mohamed Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle |
title | Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle |
title_full | Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle |
title_fullStr | Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle |
title_short | Effect of COVID-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle |
title_sort | effect of covid-19 vaccination on the menstrual cycle |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9802578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590952 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1065421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaomelissajung effectofcovid19vaccinationonthemenstrualcycle AT menoncarlo effectofcovid19vaccinationonthemenstrualcycle AT elgendimohamed effectofcovid19vaccinationonthemenstrualcycle |