Cargando…

A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies

BACKGROUND: Light pollution could represent one of the main drivers behind the current biodiversity erosion. While the effects of many light components on biodiversity have already been studied, the influence of flicker remains poorly understood. The determination of the threshold frequency at which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lafitte, Alix, Sordello, Romain, Legrand, Marc, Nicolas, Virginie, Obein, Gaël, Reyjol, Yorick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36584184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
_version_ 1784861822859345920
author Lafitte, Alix
Sordello, Romain
Legrand, Marc
Nicolas, Virginie
Obein, Gaël
Reyjol, Yorick
author_facet Lafitte, Alix
Sordello, Romain
Legrand, Marc
Nicolas, Virginie
Obein, Gaël
Reyjol, Yorick
author_sort Lafitte, Alix
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Light pollution could represent one of the main drivers behind the current biodiversity erosion. While the effects of many light components on biodiversity have already been studied, the influence of flicker remains poorly understood. The determination of the threshold frequency at which a flickering light is perceived as continuous by a species, usually called the Critical Fusion Frequency (CFF), could thus help further identify the impacts of artificial lighting on animals. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed at answering the following questions: what is the distribution of CFF between species? Are there differences in how flicker is perceived between taxonomic classes? Which species are more at risk of being impacted by artificial lighting flicker? METHODS: Citations were extracted from three literature databases and were then screened successively on their titles, abstracts and full-texts. Included studies were critically appraised to assess their validity. All relevant data were extracted and analysed to determine the distribution of CFF in the animal kingdom and the influence of experimental designs and species traits on CFF. RESULTS: At first, 4881 citations were found. Screening and critical appraisal provided 200 CFF values for 156 species. Reported values of CFF varied from a maximum of between 300 Hz and 500 Hz for the beetle Melanophila acuminata D. to a mean of 0.57 (± 0.08) Hz for the snail Lissachatina fulica B. Insects and birds had higher CFF than all other studied taxa. Irrespective of taxon, nocturnal species had lower CFF than diurnal and crepuscular ones. CONCLUSIONS: We identified nine crepuscular and nocturnal species that could be impacted by the potential adverse effects of anthropogenic light flicker. We emphasize that there remains a huge gap in our knowledge of flicker perception by animals, which could potentially be hampering our understanding of its impacts on biodiversity, especially in key taxa like bats, nocturnal birds and insects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9803175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98031752022-12-31 A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies Lafitte, Alix Sordello, Romain Legrand, Marc Nicolas, Virginie Obein, Gaël Reyjol, Yorick PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Light pollution could represent one of the main drivers behind the current biodiversity erosion. While the effects of many light components on biodiversity have already been studied, the influence of flicker remains poorly understood. The determination of the threshold frequency at which a flickering light is perceived as continuous by a species, usually called the Critical Fusion Frequency (CFF), could thus help further identify the impacts of artificial lighting on animals. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed at answering the following questions: what is the distribution of CFF between species? Are there differences in how flicker is perceived between taxonomic classes? Which species are more at risk of being impacted by artificial lighting flicker? METHODS: Citations were extracted from three literature databases and were then screened successively on their titles, abstracts and full-texts. Included studies were critically appraised to assess their validity. All relevant data were extracted and analysed to determine the distribution of CFF in the animal kingdom and the influence of experimental designs and species traits on CFF. RESULTS: At first, 4881 citations were found. Screening and critical appraisal provided 200 CFF values for 156 species. Reported values of CFF varied from a maximum of between 300 Hz and 500 Hz for the beetle Melanophila acuminata D. to a mean of 0.57 (± 0.08) Hz for the snail Lissachatina fulica B. Insects and birds had higher CFF than all other studied taxa. Irrespective of taxon, nocturnal species had lower CFF than diurnal and crepuscular ones. CONCLUSIONS: We identified nine crepuscular and nocturnal species that could be impacted by the potential adverse effects of anthropogenic light flicker. We emphasize that there remains a huge gap in our knowledge of flicker perception by animals, which could potentially be hampering our understanding of its impacts on biodiversity, especially in key taxa like bats, nocturnal birds and insects. Public Library of Science 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9803175/ /pubmed/36584184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718 Text en © 2022 Lafitte et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lafitte, Alix
Sordello, Romain
Legrand, Marc
Nicolas, Virginie
Obein, Gaël
Reyjol, Yorick
A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies
title A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies
title_full A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies
title_fullStr A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies
title_full_unstemmed A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies
title_short A flashing light may not be that flashy: A systematic review on critical fusion frequencies
title_sort flashing light may not be that flashy: a systematic review on critical fusion frequencies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36584184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279718
work_keys_str_mv AT lafittealix aflashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT sordelloromain aflashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT legrandmarc aflashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT nicolasvirginie aflashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT obeingael aflashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT reyjolyorick aflashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT lafittealix flashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT sordelloromain flashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT legrandmarc flashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT nicolasvirginie flashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT obeingael flashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies
AT reyjolyorick flashinglightmaynotbethatflashyasystematicreviewoncriticalfusionfrequencies