Cargando…

Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service

Background Osteoarthritis is a substantive burden on the population and National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. A recent systematic review suggests that intra-articular steroid injections are an efficacious conservative treatment modality. The NHS Constitution states that “patients shou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duvnjak, Haris, Ammori, Mohannad B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600858
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32063
_version_ 1784861842082889728
author Duvnjak, Haris
Ammori, Mohannad B
author_facet Duvnjak, Haris
Ammori, Mohannad B
author_sort Duvnjak, Haris
collection PubMed
description Background Osteoarthritis is a substantive burden on the population and National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. A recent systematic review suggests that intra-articular steroid injections are an efficacious conservative treatment modality. The NHS Constitution states that “patients should wait no longer than 18 weeks from GP referral to treatment.” An NHS hospital trust failed to meet this standard in a quarter of patients waiting for an intra-articular steroid injection of the hip. Strategies were considered to improve the time from referral to treatment (RTT). The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve the efficiency and capacity of the injection list. Materials and methods Patients who underwent an injection on a list between January and April 2019 were identified. Data were retrospectively collected and included the sites of injection and waiting times. Proformas for documentation and discharge summaries were introduced. Time taken for each appointment pre- and post-intervention were compared with the aim to increase the number of patients per list. Results Thirty-six (26%) of 138 patients experienced delays beyond 18 weeks from RTT. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) number of weeks waiting for an injection from the time of referral was 14 (6). The mean (SD) time for each appointment was 12 minutes 36 seconds (7 minutes 36 seconds) pre-intervention and 8 minutes 36 seconds (3 minutes 12 seconds) post-intervention. Discussion and conclusion Our standardized proformas led to an improvement in efficiency by reducing the time taken for documentation and capacity by subsequently increasing the number of patients per list.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9803253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98032532023-01-03 Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service Duvnjak, Haris Ammori, Mohannad B Cureus Orthopedics Background Osteoarthritis is a substantive burden on the population and National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. A recent systematic review suggests that intra-articular steroid injections are an efficacious conservative treatment modality. The NHS Constitution states that “patients should wait no longer than 18 weeks from GP referral to treatment.” An NHS hospital trust failed to meet this standard in a quarter of patients waiting for an intra-articular steroid injection of the hip. Strategies were considered to improve the time from referral to treatment (RTT). The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve the efficiency and capacity of the injection list. Materials and methods Patients who underwent an injection on a list between January and April 2019 were identified. Data were retrospectively collected and included the sites of injection and waiting times. Proformas for documentation and discharge summaries were introduced. Time taken for each appointment pre- and post-intervention were compared with the aim to increase the number of patients per list. Results Thirty-six (26%) of 138 patients experienced delays beyond 18 weeks from RTT. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) number of weeks waiting for an injection from the time of referral was 14 (6). The mean (SD) time for each appointment was 12 minutes 36 seconds (7 minutes 36 seconds) pre-intervention and 8 minutes 36 seconds (3 minutes 12 seconds) post-intervention. Discussion and conclusion Our standardized proformas led to an improvement in efficiency by reducing the time taken for documentation and capacity by subsequently increasing the number of patients per list. Cureus 2022-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9803253/ /pubmed/36600858 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32063 Text en Copyright © 2022, Duvnjak et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Duvnjak, Haris
Ammori, Mohannad B
Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service
title Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service
title_full Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service
title_fullStr Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service
title_full_unstemmed Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service
title_short Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service
title_sort quality improvement of a hip injection service
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600858
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32063
work_keys_str_mv AT duvnjakharis qualityimprovementofahipinjectionservice
AT ammorimohannadb qualityimprovementofahipinjectionservice