Cargando…
The clinical prognostic value of lncRNA LINC00473 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis
LINC00473 is a promising long non-coding RNA. There is increasing evidence that SNHG7 is abnormally expressed in various tumors and is associated with cancer prognosis. However, identification of the effect of long non-coding RNA LINC00473 in tumors remains necessary. METHODS: Up to August 15, 2021,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36596056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032465 |
_version_ | 1784861886576066560 |
---|---|
author | He, Yuanyang Chen, Zheng He, Jingyu |
author_facet | He, Yuanyang Chen, Zheng He, Jingyu |
author_sort | He, Yuanyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | LINC00473 is a promising long non-coding RNA. There is increasing evidence that SNHG7 is abnormally expressed in various tumors and is associated with cancer prognosis. However, identification of the effect of long non-coding RNA LINC00473 in tumors remains necessary. METHODS: Up to August 15, 2021, we searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, and Web of Science. The results were evaluated by pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There weres 13 included literature totaling cancer patients involved in this meta-analysis. The aggregated results revealed that high expression of LINC00473 was significantly associated with unfavorable overall survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.48–1.86, P < .00001), disease-free survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.09–2.32, P = .02) in a variety of cancers. Additionally, increased LINC00473 expression was also correlated with tumor node metastasis stage ((III/IV vs I/II) OR = 4.67, 95% CI = 3.11–7.02, P < .00001), differentiation ((poor/moderately vs well) OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 1.41–7.50, P = .006), tumor size ((larger vs smaller) OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.26–4.91, P = .03), and lymph node metastasis ((positive vs negative) OR = 3.10, 95% CI = 2.13–4.51, P = .008) in patients with cancers. Besides, the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis dataset evaluated that LINC00473 was upregulated in a variety of tumors and predicted worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: Our results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that high LINC00473 expression may become a potential target for predicting prognosis of human cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9803443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98034432023-01-03 The clinical prognostic value of lncRNA LINC00473 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis He, Yuanyang Chen, Zheng He, Jingyu Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 LINC00473 is a promising long non-coding RNA. There is increasing evidence that SNHG7 is abnormally expressed in various tumors and is associated with cancer prognosis. However, identification of the effect of long non-coding RNA LINC00473 in tumors remains necessary. METHODS: Up to August 15, 2021, we searched electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, and Web of Science. The results were evaluated by pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There weres 13 included literature totaling cancer patients involved in this meta-analysis. The aggregated results revealed that high expression of LINC00473 was significantly associated with unfavorable overall survival (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.48–1.86, P < .00001), disease-free survival (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.09–2.32, P = .02) in a variety of cancers. Additionally, increased LINC00473 expression was also correlated with tumor node metastasis stage ((III/IV vs I/II) OR = 4.67, 95% CI = 3.11–7.02, P < .00001), differentiation ((poor/moderately vs well) OR = 3.25, 95% CI = 1.41–7.50, P = .006), tumor size ((larger vs smaller) OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.26–4.91, P = .03), and lymph node metastasis ((positive vs negative) OR = 3.10, 95% CI = 2.13–4.51, P = .008) in patients with cancers. Besides, the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis dataset evaluated that LINC00473 was upregulated in a variety of tumors and predicted worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: Our results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that high LINC00473 expression may become a potential target for predicting prognosis of human cancers. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9803443/ /pubmed/36596056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032465 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 5700 He, Yuanyang Chen, Zheng He, Jingyu The clinical prognostic value of lncRNA LINC00473 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis |
title | The clinical prognostic value of lncRNA LINC00473 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis |
title_full | The clinical prognostic value of lncRNA LINC00473 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The clinical prognostic value of lncRNA LINC00473 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The clinical prognostic value of lncRNA LINC00473 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis |
title_short | The clinical prognostic value of lncRNA LINC00473 in cancer patients: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | clinical prognostic value of lncrna linc00473 in cancer patients: a meta-analysis |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36596056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032465 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heyuanyang theclinicalprognosticvalueoflncrnalinc00473incancerpatientsametaanalysis AT chenzheng theclinicalprognosticvalueoflncrnalinc00473incancerpatientsametaanalysis AT hejingyu theclinicalprognosticvalueoflncrnalinc00473incancerpatientsametaanalysis AT heyuanyang clinicalprognosticvalueoflncrnalinc00473incancerpatientsametaanalysis AT chenzheng clinicalprognosticvalueoflncrnalinc00473incancerpatientsametaanalysis AT hejingyu clinicalprognosticvalueoflncrnalinc00473incancerpatientsametaanalysis |