Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a relatively new type of treatment for many musculoskeletal disorders. However, ESWT for low back pain remains controversial as the pain relieve benefit is questionable. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effectiveness and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032053 |
_version_ | 1784861904572776448 |
---|---|
author | Li, Chunhong Xiao, Zhibo Chen, Liuli Pan, Songli |
author_facet | Li, Chunhong Xiao, Zhibo Chen, Liuli Pan, Songli |
author_sort | Li, Chunhong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a relatively new type of treatment for many musculoskeletal disorders. However, ESWT for low back pain remains controversial as the pain relieve benefit is questionable. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effectiveness and safety of ESWT interventions on pain and disability in patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: In this meta-analysis, we searched electronic databases in the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane’s library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database to determine the equivalence of ESWT and placebo for the treatment of LBP up to April 4, 2022. A number of other outcomes were measured, including functional status, quality of life, and psychological outcomes measured by the Oswestry Disability Index. Weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes, while risk ratios were calculated for binary outcomes. Stata 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials included for further analysis. Compared with control, the ESWT group showed lower pain intensity at month 1 (P < .05), as well as lower disability score at month 1 (P < .05) and at month 3 (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference between ESWT and control groups in terms of the pain intensity at month 3 (P > .05). No serious adverse events related to treatment were reported. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the conclusions from this analysis were robust. CONCLUSIONS: ESWT is effective in alleviating pain and improving the functional outcomes for patients with LBP. However, there remains a lack of high-level evidence to verify their effectiveness and safety and support their clinical application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9803516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98035162023-01-03 Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis Li, Chunhong Xiao, Zhibo Chen, Liuli Pan, Songli Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a relatively new type of treatment for many musculoskeletal disorders. However, ESWT for low back pain remains controversial as the pain relieve benefit is questionable. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effectiveness and safety of ESWT interventions on pain and disability in patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: In this meta-analysis, we searched electronic databases in the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane’s library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database to determine the equivalence of ESWT and placebo for the treatment of LBP up to April 4, 2022. A number of other outcomes were measured, including functional status, quality of life, and psychological outcomes measured by the Oswestry Disability Index. Weighted mean differences were calculated for continuous outcomes, while risk ratios were calculated for binary outcomes. Stata 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials included for further analysis. Compared with control, the ESWT group showed lower pain intensity at month 1 (P < .05), as well as lower disability score at month 1 (P < .05) and at month 3 (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference between ESWT and control groups in terms of the pain intensity at month 3 (P > .05). No serious adverse events related to treatment were reported. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the conclusions from this analysis were robust. CONCLUSIONS: ESWT is effective in alleviating pain and improving the functional outcomes for patients with LBP. However, there remains a lack of high-level evidence to verify their effectiveness and safety and support their clinical application. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9803516/ /pubmed/36595991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032053 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 7100 Li, Chunhong Xiao, Zhibo Chen, Liuli Pan, Songli Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave on low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36595991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lichunhong efficacyandsafetyofextracorporealshockwaveonlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaozhibo efficacyandsafetyofextracorporealshockwaveonlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenliuli efficacyandsafetyofextracorporealshockwaveonlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pansongli efficacyandsafetyofextracorporealshockwaveonlowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |