Cargando…
Correlation of ROS1 (D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with ROS1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas
Objective Repressor of Silencing ( ROS1 ) gene rearrangement in the lung adenocarcinomas is one of the targetable mutually exclusive genomic alteration. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), next-generation sequencing, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750187 |
_version_ | 1784861910100869120 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Shivani Mishra, Sourav K. Bhardwaj, Mohit Jha, Shilpy Geller, Matthew Dewan, Aditi Jain, Ekta Dixit, Mallika Jain, Deepika Munjal, Gauri Kumar, Shivmurti Mohanty, Sambit K. |
author_facet | Sharma, Shivani Mishra, Sourav K. Bhardwaj, Mohit Jha, Shilpy Geller, Matthew Dewan, Aditi Jain, Ekta Dixit, Mallika Jain, Deepika Munjal, Gauri Kumar, Shivmurti Mohanty, Sambit K. |
author_sort | Sharma, Shivani |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective Repressor of Silencing ( ROS1 ) gene rearrangement in the lung adenocarcinomas is one of the targetable mutually exclusive genomic alteration. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), next-generation sequencing, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays are generally used to detect ROS1 gene alterations. We evaluated the correlation between ROS1 IHC and FISH analysis considering FISH as the gold standard method to determine the utility of IHC as a screening method for lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods A total of 374 advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients were analyzed for ROS1 IHC on Ventana Benchmark XT platform using D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody. FISH assay was performed in parallel in all these cases using the Vysis ROS1 Break Apart FISH probe. Statistical Analysis The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were evaluated. Results A total of 17 tumors were positive either by IHC or FISH analysis or both (true positive). Four tumors were positive by IHC (H-score range: 120–270), while negative on FISH analysis (false positive by IHC). One tumor was IHC negative, but positive by FISH analysis (false negative). The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 94.4% (confidence interval [CI]: 72.71–99.86%), 63.6% (CI: 30.79–89.07%), 2.6 (CI: 1.18–5.72), 0.09 (CI: 0.01–0.62), 80.95% (CI: 65.86–90.35%), 87.5% (CI: 49.74–98.02%), and 82.76%, respectively. Conclusion ROS1 IHC has high sensitivity at a cost of lower specificity for the detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement. All IHC positive cases should undergo a confirmatory FISH test as this testing algorithm stands as a reliable and economic tool to screen ROS1 rearrangement in lung adenocarcinomas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9803544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98035442022-12-31 Correlation of ROS1 (D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with ROS1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas Sharma, Shivani Mishra, Sourav K. Bhardwaj, Mohit Jha, Shilpy Geller, Matthew Dewan, Aditi Jain, Ekta Dixit, Mallika Jain, Deepika Munjal, Gauri Kumar, Shivmurti Mohanty, Sambit K. South Asian J Cancer Objective Repressor of Silencing ( ROS1 ) gene rearrangement in the lung adenocarcinomas is one of the targetable mutually exclusive genomic alteration. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), next-generation sequencing, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays are generally used to detect ROS1 gene alterations. We evaluated the correlation between ROS1 IHC and FISH analysis considering FISH as the gold standard method to determine the utility of IHC as a screening method for lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods A total of 374 advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients were analyzed for ROS1 IHC on Ventana Benchmark XT platform using D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody. FISH assay was performed in parallel in all these cases using the Vysis ROS1 Break Apart FISH probe. Statistical Analysis The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were evaluated. Results A total of 17 tumors were positive either by IHC or FISH analysis or both (true positive). Four tumors were positive by IHC (H-score range: 120–270), while negative on FISH analysis (false positive by IHC). One tumor was IHC negative, but positive by FISH analysis (false negative). The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 94.4% (confidence interval [CI]: 72.71–99.86%), 63.6% (CI: 30.79–89.07%), 2.6 (CI: 1.18–5.72), 0.09 (CI: 0.01–0.62), 80.95% (CI: 65.86–90.35%), 87.5% (CI: 49.74–98.02%), and 82.76%, respectively. Conclusion ROS1 IHC has high sensitivity at a cost of lower specificity for the detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement. All IHC positive cases should undergo a confirmatory FISH test as this testing algorithm stands as a reliable and economic tool to screen ROS1 rearrangement in lung adenocarcinomas. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2022-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9803544/ /pubmed/36588618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750187 Text en MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sharma, Shivani Mishra, Sourav K. Bhardwaj, Mohit Jha, Shilpy Geller, Matthew Dewan, Aditi Jain, Ekta Dixit, Mallika Jain, Deepika Munjal, Gauri Kumar, Shivmurti Mohanty, Sambit K. Correlation of ROS1 (D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with ROS1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas |
title |
Correlation of
ROS1
(D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with
ROS1
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas
|
title_full |
Correlation of
ROS1
(D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with
ROS1
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas
|
title_fullStr |
Correlation of
ROS1
(D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with
ROS1
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Correlation of
ROS1
(D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with
ROS1
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas
|
title_short |
Correlation of
ROS1
(D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with
ROS1
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas
|
title_sort | correlation of
ros1
(d4d6) immunohistochemistry with
ros1
fluorescence in situ hybridization assay in a contemporary cohort of pulmonary adenocarcinomas |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588618 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmashivani correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT mishrasouravk correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT bhardwajmohit correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT jhashilpy correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT gellermatthew correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT dewanaditi correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT jainekta correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT dixitmallika correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT jaindeepika correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT munjalgauri correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT kumarshivmurti correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas AT mohantysambitk correlationofros1d4d6immunohistochemistrywithros1fluorescenceinsituhybridizationassayinacontemporarycohortofpulmonaryadenocarcinomas |