Non-invasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation inhibiting respiratory motion in healthy volunteers

Precision radiotherapy needs to manage organ movements to prevent critical organ injury. The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of motion control of the lung by suppressing respiratory motion. The non-invasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation (NIHFOV) is a technique commonly used in the protection of lung for patients with acute lung disease. By using a very high respiratory frequency and a low tidal volume, NIHFOV allows gas exchange, maintains a constant mean airway pressure and minimizes the respiratory movements. We tested healthy volunteers NIHFOV to explore the optimal operational parameter setting and the best possible motion suppression achievable. This study was conducted with the approval of Institutional Review Boards of the Wuwei Cancer hospital (approval number: 2021-39) and carried out in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki. The study comprises two parts. Twenty three healthy volunteers participated in the first part of the study. They had 7 sessions of training with the NIHFOV. The duration of uninterrupted, continuous breathing under the NIHFOV and the optimal operational machine settings were defined. Eight healthy volunteers took part in the second part of the study and underwent 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) scanning with and without NIHFOV. Their respiratory waveform under free breathing (FB) and NIHFOV were recorded. The maximum range of motion of the diaphragm from the two scannings was compared, and the variation of bilateral lung volume was obtained to evaluate the impact of NIHFOV technique on lung volume. The following data were collected: comfort score, transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (PtcO(2)), transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PtcCO(2)), and pulse rate. Data with and without NIHFOV were compared to evaluate its safety, physiological impacts and effect of lung movement suppression. All the volunteers completed the training sessions eventlessly, demonstrating a good tolerability of the procedure. The median NIHFOV-on time was 32 min (22–45 min), and the maximum range of motion in the cephalic-caudal direction was significantly reduced on NIHFOV compared with FB (1.8 ± 0.8 cm vs 0.3 ± 0.1 cm, t = − 3.650, P = 0.003); the median range of motion was only 0.3 ± 0.1 cm on NIHFOV with a good reproducibility. The variation coefficient under NIHFOV of the right lung volume was 2.4% and the left lung volume was 9.2%. The PtcO(2) and PtcCO(2) were constantly monitored during NIHFOV. The medium PtcCO(2) under NIHFOV increased lightly by 4.1 mmHg (interquartile range [IQR], 4–6 mmHg) compared with FB (t = 17.676, P < 0.001). No hypercapnia was found, PtcO(2) increased significantly in all volunteers during NIHFOV (t = 25.453, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pulse rate between the two data sets (t = 1.257, P = 0.233). NIHFOV is easy to master in healthy volunteers to minimize respiratory movement with good tolerability and reproducibility. It is a feasible approach for lung motion control and could potentially be applied in accurate radiotherapy including carbon-ion radiotherapy through suppression of respiratory movement.