Cargando…
An accurate prediction of the origin for bone metastatic cancer using deep learning on digital pathological images
BACKGROUND: Determining the origin of bone metastatic cancer (OBMC) is of great significance to clinical therapeutics. It is challenging for pathologists to determine the OBMC with limited clinical information and bone biopsy. METHODS: We designed a regional multiple-instance learning algorithm to p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36577348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104426 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Determining the origin of bone metastatic cancer (OBMC) is of great significance to clinical therapeutics. It is challenging for pathologists to determine the OBMC with limited clinical information and bone biopsy. METHODS: We designed a regional multiple-instance learning algorithm to predict the OBMC based on hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining slides alone. We collected 1041 cases from eight different hospitals and labeled 26,431 regions of interest to train the model. The performance of the model was assessed by ten-fold cross validation and external validation. Under the guidance of top3 predictions, we conducted an IHC test on 175 cases of unknown origins to compare the consistency of the results predicted by the model and indicated by the IHC markers. We also applied the model to identify whether there was tumor or not in a region, as well as distinguishing squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine tumor. FINDINGS: In the within-cohort, our model achieved a top1-accuracy of 91.35% and a top3-accuracy of 97.75%. In the external cohort, our model displayed a good generalizability with a top3-accuracy of 97.44%. The top1 consistency between the results of the model and the immunohistochemistry markers was 83.90% and the top3 consistency was 94.33%. The model obtained an accuracy of 98.98% to identify whether there was tumor or not and an accuracy of 93.85% to differentiate three types of cancers. INTERPRETATION: Our model demonstrated good performance to predict the OBMC from routine histology and had great potential for assisting pathologists with determining the OBMC accurately. FUNDING: 10.13039/501100001809National Science Foundation of China (61875102 and 61975089), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong province (2021A15-15012379 and 2022A1515 012550), Science and Technology Research Program of Shenzhen City (JCYJ20200109110606054 and WDZC20200821141349001), and 10.13039/501100004147Tsinghua University Spring Breeze Fund (2020Z99CFZ023). |
---|