Cargando…
“This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients”
The increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed the approach to breast surgery. NACT allows de-escalation of surgery by both increasing breast conservation rates (up to 40%), the initial goal of this chemotherapy, and in particular it permits reduces axillary surgery. Furthermore, i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36566690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.010 |
_version_ | 1784861968324100096 |
---|---|
author | Galimberti, Viviana Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler Vicini, Elisa Morigi, Consuelo Sargenti, Manuela Corso, Giovanni Magnoni, Francesca Intra, Mattia Veronesi, Paolo |
author_facet | Galimberti, Viviana Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler Vicini, Elisa Morigi, Consuelo Sargenti, Manuela Corso, Giovanni Magnoni, Francesca Intra, Mattia Veronesi, Paolo |
author_sort | Galimberti, Viviana |
collection | PubMed |
description | The increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed the approach to breast surgery. NACT allows de-escalation of surgery by both increasing breast conservation rates (up to 40%), the initial goal of this chemotherapy, and in particular it permits reduces axillary surgery. Furthermore, in relation to the molecular characteristics of the tumor we can have a pathological complete response (pCR) ranging from 20 to 80%. In clinically node positive (cN+) patients who converted to clinically node-negative (cN0) various prospective studies have demonstrated that the false negative rate (FNR) of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) were higher than the acceptable 10% and strategies to reduce the FNR in cN + patients are being investigated. But all the effort to reduce the FNR does not have clinical prognostic significance. This has already been demonstrated in the literature in different randomized trials with long term follow up. The 10-year follow-up of our study confirmed our preliminary data that the use of standard SNB without the use of clip is acceptable in cN1/2 patients who become cN0 after NAT and will not translate into a worse outcome. In fact, the axillary recurrences were less than 2%. Similar positive data with different follow up were also confirmed by other studies that used SNB alone without TAD. All these studies, with encouraging results on the follow up, confirm that SN surgery alone for selected patients who have an excellent response to NACT is rationale and not oncologically inferior to AD during a short- and long-term follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9803818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98038182023-01-01 “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients” Galimberti, Viviana Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler Vicini, Elisa Morigi, Consuelo Sargenti, Manuela Corso, Giovanni Magnoni, Francesca Intra, Mattia Veronesi, Paolo Breast Article The increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed the approach to breast surgery. NACT allows de-escalation of surgery by both increasing breast conservation rates (up to 40%), the initial goal of this chemotherapy, and in particular it permits reduces axillary surgery. Furthermore, in relation to the molecular characteristics of the tumor we can have a pathological complete response (pCR) ranging from 20 to 80%. In clinically node positive (cN+) patients who converted to clinically node-negative (cN0) various prospective studies have demonstrated that the false negative rate (FNR) of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) were higher than the acceptable 10% and strategies to reduce the FNR in cN + patients are being investigated. But all the effort to reduce the FNR does not have clinical prognostic significance. This has already been demonstrated in the literature in different randomized trials with long term follow up. The 10-year follow-up of our study confirmed our preliminary data that the use of standard SNB without the use of clip is acceptable in cN1/2 patients who become cN0 after NAT and will not translate into a worse outcome. In fact, the axillary recurrences were less than 2%. Similar positive data with different follow up were also confirmed by other studies that used SNB alone without TAD. All these studies, with encouraging results on the follow up, confirm that SN surgery alone for selected patients who have an excellent response to NACT is rationale and not oncologically inferior to AD during a short- and long-term follow-up. Elsevier 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9803818/ /pubmed/36566690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.010 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Galimberti, Viviana Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler Vicini, Elisa Morigi, Consuelo Sargenti, Manuela Corso, Giovanni Magnoni, Francesca Intra, Mattia Veronesi, Paolo “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients” |
title | “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients” |
title_full | “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients” |
title_fullStr | “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients” |
title_full_unstemmed | “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients” |
title_short | “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients” |
title_sort | “this house believes that: sentinel node biopsy alone is better than tad after nact for cn+ patients” |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36566690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galimbertiviviana thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients AT ribeirofontanasabrinakahler thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients AT vicinielisa thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients AT morigiconsuelo thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients AT sargentimanuela thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients AT corsogiovanni thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients AT magnonifrancesca thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients AT intramattia thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients AT veronesipaolo thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients |