Cargando…

“This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients”

The increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed the approach to breast surgery. NACT allows de-escalation of surgery by both increasing breast conservation rates (up to 40%), the initial goal of this chemotherapy, and in particular it permits reduces axillary surgery. Furthermore, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galimberti, Viviana, Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler, Vicini, Elisa, Morigi, Consuelo, Sargenti, Manuela, Corso, Giovanni, Magnoni, Francesca, Intra, Mattia, Veronesi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36566690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.010
_version_ 1784861968324100096
author Galimberti, Viviana
Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler
Vicini, Elisa
Morigi, Consuelo
Sargenti, Manuela
Corso, Giovanni
Magnoni, Francesca
Intra, Mattia
Veronesi, Paolo
author_facet Galimberti, Viviana
Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler
Vicini, Elisa
Morigi, Consuelo
Sargenti, Manuela
Corso, Giovanni
Magnoni, Francesca
Intra, Mattia
Veronesi, Paolo
author_sort Galimberti, Viviana
collection PubMed
description The increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed the approach to breast surgery. NACT allows de-escalation of surgery by both increasing breast conservation rates (up to 40%), the initial goal of this chemotherapy, and in particular it permits reduces axillary surgery. Furthermore, in relation to the molecular characteristics of the tumor we can have a pathological complete response (pCR) ranging from 20 to 80%. In clinically node positive (cN+) patients who converted to clinically node-negative (cN0) various prospective studies have demonstrated that the false negative rate (FNR) of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) were higher than the acceptable 10% and strategies to reduce the FNR in cN + patients are being investigated. But all the effort to reduce the FNR does not have clinical prognostic significance. This has already been demonstrated in the literature in different randomized trials with long term follow up. The 10-year follow-up of our study confirmed our preliminary data that the use of standard SNB without the use of clip is acceptable in cN1/2 patients who become cN0 after NAT and will not translate into a worse outcome. In fact, the axillary recurrences were less than 2%. Similar positive data with different follow up were also confirmed by other studies that used SNB alone without TAD. All these studies, with encouraging results on the follow up, confirm that SN surgery alone for selected patients who have an excellent response to NACT is rationale and not oncologically inferior to AD during a short- and long-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9803818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98038182023-01-01 “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients” Galimberti, Viviana Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler Vicini, Elisa Morigi, Consuelo Sargenti, Manuela Corso, Giovanni Magnoni, Francesca Intra, Mattia Veronesi, Paolo Breast Article The increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has changed the approach to breast surgery. NACT allows de-escalation of surgery by both increasing breast conservation rates (up to 40%), the initial goal of this chemotherapy, and in particular it permits reduces axillary surgery. Furthermore, in relation to the molecular characteristics of the tumor we can have a pathological complete response (pCR) ranging from 20 to 80%. In clinically node positive (cN+) patients who converted to clinically node-negative (cN0) various prospective studies have demonstrated that the false negative rate (FNR) of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) were higher than the acceptable 10% and strategies to reduce the FNR in cN + patients are being investigated. But all the effort to reduce the FNR does not have clinical prognostic significance. This has already been demonstrated in the literature in different randomized trials with long term follow up. The 10-year follow-up of our study confirmed our preliminary data that the use of standard SNB without the use of clip is acceptable in cN1/2 patients who become cN0 after NAT and will not translate into a worse outcome. In fact, the axillary recurrences were less than 2%. Similar positive data with different follow up were also confirmed by other studies that used SNB alone without TAD. All these studies, with encouraging results on the follow up, confirm that SN surgery alone for selected patients who have an excellent response to NACT is rationale and not oncologically inferior to AD during a short- and long-term follow-up. Elsevier 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9803818/ /pubmed/36566690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.010 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Galimberti, Viviana
Ribeiro Fontana, Sabrina Kahler
Vicini, Elisa
Morigi, Consuelo
Sargenti, Manuela
Corso, Giovanni
Magnoni, Francesca
Intra, Mattia
Veronesi, Paolo
“This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients”
title “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients”
title_full “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients”
title_fullStr “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients”
title_full_unstemmed “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients”
title_short “This house believes that: Sentinel node biopsy alone is better than TAD after NACT for cN+ patients”
title_sort “this house believes that: sentinel node biopsy alone is better than tad after nact for cn+ patients”
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36566690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.12.010
work_keys_str_mv AT galimbertiviviana thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients
AT ribeirofontanasabrinakahler thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients
AT vicinielisa thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients
AT morigiconsuelo thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients
AT sargentimanuela thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients
AT corsogiovanni thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients
AT magnonifrancesca thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients
AT intramattia thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients
AT veronesipaolo thishousebelievesthatsentinelnodebiopsyaloneisbetterthantadafternactforcnpatients