Cargando…
A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People’s Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face
The goal of the current research was to gain an understanding of people’s mental representations of an apologetic face. In Study 1, participants’ responses were used to generate visual templates of apologetic faces through reverse correlation (Study 1a, n = 121), and a new set of participants (Study...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5 |
_version_ | 1784861986409938944 |
---|---|
author | George, Meghan Guilfoyle, Joshua R. Steele, Jennifer R. Struthers, C. W. |
author_facet | George, Meghan Guilfoyle, Joshua R. Steele, Jennifer R. Struthers, C. W. |
author_sort | George, Meghan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The goal of the current research was to gain an understanding of people’s mental representations of an apologetic face. In Study 1, participants’ responses were used to generate visual templates of apologetic faces through reverse correlation (Study 1a, n = 121), and a new set of participants (Study 1b, n = 37 and 1c, n = 153) rated that image (group-level Classification Image, CI), as well as either the inverse image (group-level anti-CI in Study 1b) or base face (in Study 1c), on apology-related characteristics. Results demonstrated that people have a mental representation of an apologetic face, and that sadness is an important feature of this template. To examine similarities between mental representations of apologetic and sad faces, participants in Study 2 generated visual templates of sad faces using reverse correlation (Study 2a, n = 121). New participants (Study 2b, n = 162) were then randomly assigned to rate the averaged face, eyes, and mouths (group-level CIs) as well as the individual visual templates (individual-level CIs) generated from both studies for either how apologetic or sad they appeared. Visual templates of apologetic and sad faces were seen as apologetic, providing evidence of the prominence of sadness in mental representations of apology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9803897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98038972023-01-04 A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People’s Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face George, Meghan Guilfoyle, Joshua R. Steele, Jennifer R. Struthers, C. W. J Nonverbal Behav Original Paper The goal of the current research was to gain an understanding of people’s mental representations of an apologetic face. In Study 1, participants’ responses were used to generate visual templates of apologetic faces through reverse correlation (Study 1a, n = 121), and a new set of participants (Study 1b, n = 37 and 1c, n = 153) rated that image (group-level Classification Image, CI), as well as either the inverse image (group-level anti-CI in Study 1b) or base face (in Study 1c), on apology-related characteristics. Results demonstrated that people have a mental representation of an apologetic face, and that sadness is an important feature of this template. To examine similarities between mental representations of apologetic and sad faces, participants in Study 2 generated visual templates of sad faces using reverse correlation (Study 2a, n = 121). New participants (Study 2b, n = 162) were then randomly assigned to rate the averaged face, eyes, and mouths (group-level CIs) as well as the individual visual templates (individual-level CIs) generated from both studies for either how apologetic or sad they appeared. Visual templates of apologetic and sad faces were seen as apologetic, providing evidence of the prominence of sadness in mental representations of apology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5. Springer US 2022-12-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9803897/ /pubmed/36619160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper George, Meghan Guilfoyle, Joshua R. Steele, Jennifer R. Struthers, C. W. A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People’s Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face |
title | A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People’s Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face |
title_full | A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People’s Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face |
title_fullStr | A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People’s Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face |
title_full_unstemmed | A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People’s Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face |
title_short | A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People’s Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face |
title_sort | sorry excuse for an apology: examining people’s mental representations of an apologetic face |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT georgemeghan asorryexcuseforanapologyexaminingpeoplesmentalrepresentationsofanapologeticface AT guilfoylejoshuar asorryexcuseforanapologyexaminingpeoplesmentalrepresentationsofanapologeticface AT steelejenniferr asorryexcuseforanapologyexaminingpeoplesmentalrepresentationsofanapologeticface AT strutherscw asorryexcuseforanapologyexaminingpeoplesmentalrepresentationsofanapologeticface AT georgemeghan sorryexcuseforanapologyexaminingpeoplesmentalrepresentationsofanapologeticface AT guilfoylejoshuar sorryexcuseforanapologyexaminingpeoplesmentalrepresentationsofanapologeticface AT steelejenniferr sorryexcuseforanapologyexaminingpeoplesmentalrepresentationsofanapologeticface AT strutherscw sorryexcuseforanapologyexaminingpeoplesmentalrepresentationsofanapologeticface |