Cargando…

Anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs

Anthropogenic habitat modification significantly challenges biodiversity. With its intensification, understanding species' capacity to adapt is critical for conservation planning. However, little is known about whether and how different species are responding, particularly among frogs. We used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Gracie, Kingsford, Richard T., Callaghan, Corey T., Rowley, Jodi J. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16367
_version_ 1784862080425263104
author Liu, Gracie
Kingsford, Richard T.
Callaghan, Corey T.
Rowley, Jodi J. L.
author_facet Liu, Gracie
Kingsford, Richard T.
Callaghan, Corey T.
Rowley, Jodi J. L.
author_sort Liu, Gracie
collection PubMed
description Anthropogenic habitat modification significantly challenges biodiversity. With its intensification, understanding species' capacity to adapt is critical for conservation planning. However, little is known about whether and how different species are responding, particularly among frogs. We used a continental‐scale citizen science dataset of >226,000 audio recordings of 42 Australian frog species to investigate how calling—a proxy for breeding—phenology varied along an anthropogenic modification gradient. Calling started earlier and breeding seasons lengthened with increasing modification intensity. Breeding seasons averaged 22.9 ± 8.25 days (standard error) longer in the most modified compared to the least modified regions, suggesting that frog breeding activity was sensitive to habitat modification. We also examined whether calls varied along a modification gradient by analysing the temporal and spectral properties of advertisement calls from a subset of 441 audio recordings of three broadly distributed frog species. There was no appreciable effect of anthropogenic habitat modification on any of the measured call variables, although there was high variability. With continued habitat modification, species may shift towards earlier and longer breeding seasons, with largely unknown ecological consequences in terms of proximate and ultimate fitness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9804319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98043192023-01-03 Anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs Liu, Gracie Kingsford, Richard T. Callaghan, Corey T. Rowley, Jodi J. L. Glob Chang Biol Research Articles Anthropogenic habitat modification significantly challenges biodiversity. With its intensification, understanding species' capacity to adapt is critical for conservation planning. However, little is known about whether and how different species are responding, particularly among frogs. We used a continental‐scale citizen science dataset of >226,000 audio recordings of 42 Australian frog species to investigate how calling—a proxy for breeding—phenology varied along an anthropogenic modification gradient. Calling started earlier and breeding seasons lengthened with increasing modification intensity. Breeding seasons averaged 22.9 ± 8.25 days (standard error) longer in the most modified compared to the least modified regions, suggesting that frog breeding activity was sensitive to habitat modification. We also examined whether calls varied along a modification gradient by analysing the temporal and spectral properties of advertisement calls from a subset of 441 audio recordings of three broadly distributed frog species. There was no appreciable effect of anthropogenic habitat modification on any of the measured call variables, although there was high variability. With continued habitat modification, species may shift towards earlier and longer breeding seasons, with largely unknown ecological consequences in terms of proximate and ultimate fitness. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-10 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9804319/ /pubmed/35949049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16367 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Liu, Gracie
Kingsford, Richard T.
Callaghan, Corey T.
Rowley, Jodi J. L.
Anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs
title Anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs
title_full Anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs
title_fullStr Anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs
title_full_unstemmed Anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs
title_short Anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs
title_sort anthropogenic habitat modification alters calling phenology of frogs
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16367
work_keys_str_mv AT liugracie anthropogenichabitatmodificationalterscallingphenologyoffrogs
AT kingsfordrichardt anthropogenichabitatmodificationalterscallingphenologyoffrogs
AT callaghancoreyt anthropogenichabitatmodificationalterscallingphenologyoffrogs
AT rowleyjodijl anthropogenichabitatmodificationalterscallingphenologyoffrogs