Cargando…

Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species

Many ecological processes are profoundly influenced by abiotic factors, such as temperature and snow. However, despite strong evidence linking shifts in these ecological processes to corresponding shifts in abiotic factors driven by climate change, the mechanisms connecting population size to season...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Alexander V., Zimova, Marketa, Martin, Thomas E., Mills, L. Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16352
_version_ 1784862136402444288
author Kumar, Alexander V.
Zimova, Marketa
Martin, Thomas E.
Mills, L. Scott
author_facet Kumar, Alexander V.
Zimova, Marketa
Martin, Thomas E.
Mills, L. Scott
author_sort Kumar, Alexander V.
collection PubMed
description Many ecological processes are profoundly influenced by abiotic factors, such as temperature and snow. However, despite strong evidence linking shifts in these ecological processes to corresponding shifts in abiotic factors driven by climate change, the mechanisms connecting population size to season‐specific climate drivers are little understood. Using a 21‐year dataset and a Bayesian state space model, we identified biologically informed seasonal climate covariates that influenced densities of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), a cold‐adapted boreal herbivore. We found that snow and temperature had strong but conflicting season‐dependent effects. Reduced snow duration in spring and fall and warmer summers were associated with lowered hare density, whereas warmer winters were associated with increased density. When modeled simultaneously and under two climate change scenarios, the negative effects of reduced fall and spring snow duration and warmer summers overwhelm the positive effect of warmer winters, producing projected population declines. Ultimately, the contrasting population‐level impacts of climate change across seasons emphasize the critical need to examine the entire annual climate cycle to understand potential long‐term population consequences of climate change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9804553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98045532023-01-03 Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species Kumar, Alexander V. Zimova, Marketa Martin, Thomas E. Mills, L. Scott Glob Chang Biol Research Articles Many ecological processes are profoundly influenced by abiotic factors, such as temperature and snow. However, despite strong evidence linking shifts in these ecological processes to corresponding shifts in abiotic factors driven by climate change, the mechanisms connecting population size to season‐specific climate drivers are little understood. Using a 21‐year dataset and a Bayesian state space model, we identified biologically informed seasonal climate covariates that influenced densities of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), a cold‐adapted boreal herbivore. We found that snow and temperature had strong but conflicting season‐dependent effects. Reduced snow duration in spring and fall and warmer summers were associated with lowered hare density, whereas warmer winters were associated with increased density. When modeled simultaneously and under two climate change scenarios, the negative effects of reduced fall and spring snow duration and warmer summers overwhelm the positive effect of warmer winters, producing projected population declines. Ultimately, the contrasting population‐level impacts of climate change across seasons emphasize the critical need to examine the entire annual climate cycle to understand potential long‐term population consequences of climate change. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-22 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9804553/ /pubmed/35899554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16352 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kumar, Alexander V.
Zimova, Marketa
Martin, Thomas E.
Mills, L. Scott
Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species
title Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species
title_full Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species
title_fullStr Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species
title_short Contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species
title_sort contrasting seasonal effects of climate change influence density in a cold‐adapted species
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35899554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16352
work_keys_str_mv AT kumaralexanderv contrastingseasonaleffectsofclimatechangeinfluencedensityinacoldadaptedspecies
AT zimovamarketa contrastingseasonaleffectsofclimatechangeinfluencedensityinacoldadaptedspecies
AT martinthomase contrastingseasonaleffectsofclimatechangeinfluencedensityinacoldadaptedspecies
AT millslscott contrastingseasonaleffectsofclimatechangeinfluencedensityinacoldadaptedspecies