Cargando…
Use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity
The habituation–dishabituation (H–D) paradigm is an established measure of sensory perception in animals. However, it has rarely been applied to canine olfaction. It proposes that animals will lose interest in, or habituate to, a stimulus after successive exposures but will regain interest in, or di...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeab.788 |
_version_ | 1784862144467042304 |
---|---|
author | Moser, Ariella Y. Brown, Wendy Y. Bizo, Lewis A. |
author_facet | Moser, Ariella Y. Brown, Wendy Y. Bizo, Lewis A. |
author_sort | Moser, Ariella Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The habituation–dishabituation (H–D) paradigm is an established measure of sensory perception in animals. However, it has rarely been applied to canine olfaction. It proposes that animals will lose interest in, or habituate to, a stimulus after successive exposures but will regain interest in, or dishabituate to, a novel stimulus if they can perceive it. This study assessed an H–D test's practicability to determine dogs' olfactory detection thresholds (ODTs) for a neutral odorant. A random selection of mixed‐breed pet dogs (n = 26) participated in two H–D tests in a repeated‐measures crossover design. They were first habituated to a carrier odor and then presented with either ascending concentrations of n‐amyl acetate in the known ODT range (experimental condition) or repeated carrier odor presentations (control condition). No single odor concentration elicited dishabituation in the majority of the dogs. However, individual dogs dishabituated at differing experimental concentrations significantly more often than in the control condition (p = .012). These findings provide some tentative support for using this method in studying canine olfaction. However, further assessment and refinement are needed before it can be a viable alternative to traditional ODT measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9804587 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98045872023-01-03 Use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity Moser, Ariella Y. Brown, Wendy Y. Bizo, Lewis A. J Exp Anal Behav Research Articles The habituation–dishabituation (H–D) paradigm is an established measure of sensory perception in animals. However, it has rarely been applied to canine olfaction. It proposes that animals will lose interest in, or habituate to, a stimulus after successive exposures but will regain interest in, or dishabituate to, a novel stimulus if they can perceive it. This study assessed an H–D test's practicability to determine dogs' olfactory detection thresholds (ODTs) for a neutral odorant. A random selection of mixed‐breed pet dogs (n = 26) participated in two H–D tests in a repeated‐measures crossover design. They were first habituated to a carrier odor and then presented with either ascending concentrations of n‐amyl acetate in the known ODT range (experimental condition) or repeated carrier odor presentations (control condition). No single odor concentration elicited dishabituation in the majority of the dogs. However, individual dogs dishabituated at differing experimental concentrations significantly more often than in the control condition (p = .012). These findings provide some tentative support for using this method in studying canine olfaction. However, further assessment and refinement are needed before it can be a viable alternative to traditional ODT measurement. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. 2022-08-14 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9804587/ /pubmed/36121596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeab.788 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Moser, Ariella Y. Brown, Wendy Y. Bizo, Lewis A. Use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity |
title | Use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity |
title_full | Use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity |
title_fullStr | Use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity |
title_short | Use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity |
title_sort | use of a habituation–dishabituation test to determine canine olfactory sensitivity |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804587/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36121596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jeab.788 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moserariellay useofahabituationdishabituationtesttodeterminecanineolfactorysensitivity AT brownwendyy useofahabituationdishabituationtesttodeterminecanineolfactorysensitivity AT bizolewisa useofahabituationdishabituationtesttodeterminecanineolfactorysensitivity |