Cargando…

Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of preparation type (inlay, onlay, and crown) on the accuracy of different intraoral scanning (IOS) systems at the preparation and arch segment levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three molars were prepared for inlay, onlay, and crown. Each preparation was scanned 10 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abduo, Jaafar, Laskey, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12949
_version_ 1784862147479601152
author Abduo, Jaafar
Laskey, David
author_facet Abduo, Jaafar
Laskey, David
author_sort Abduo, Jaafar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of preparation type (inlay, onlay, and crown) on the accuracy of different intraoral scanning (IOS) systems at the preparation and arch segment levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three molars were prepared for inlay, onlay, and crown. Each preparation was scanned 10 times by CEREC Omnicam, Trios 3 (TS), and Medit i500 scanners. Each image was trimmed twice. The first trimming produced a preparation image (PI), and the second trimming extracted a segment image (SI) that involved the preparation with the adjacent teeth. Trueness and precision were calculated at the PI and SI levels. RESULTS: At the PI level, all IOS systems had similar trueness pattern for all preparations, where the inlay had the best trueness followed by the crown and onlay. At the SI level, the different preparations showed similar trueness. The precision did not show a clear pattern of superiority for any preparation. The TS was significantly more precise than other IOS systems at the PI and SI levels, for every preparation. The proximal areas suffered from the greatest errors, regardless of preparation type. CONCLUSIONS: The preparation type influenced PI trueness, and the IOS system affected PI and SI precisions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The smaller and less complex preparations have greater IOS accuracy than larger and more complex preparations. As the proximal areas are more affected regardless of the preparation, a more accessible proximal area for scanning is desirable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9804600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98046002023-01-03 Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation Abduo, Jaafar Laskey, David J Esthet Restor Dent Research Articles OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the effect of preparation type (inlay, onlay, and crown) on the accuracy of different intraoral scanning (IOS) systems at the preparation and arch segment levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three molars were prepared for inlay, onlay, and crown. Each preparation was scanned 10 times by CEREC Omnicam, Trios 3 (TS), and Medit i500 scanners. Each image was trimmed twice. The first trimming produced a preparation image (PI), and the second trimming extracted a segment image (SI) that involved the preparation with the adjacent teeth. Trueness and precision were calculated at the PI and SI levels. RESULTS: At the PI level, all IOS systems had similar trueness pattern for all preparations, where the inlay had the best trueness followed by the crown and onlay. At the SI level, the different preparations showed similar trueness. The precision did not show a clear pattern of superiority for any preparation. The TS was significantly more precise than other IOS systems at the PI and SI levels, for every preparation. The proximal areas suffered from the greatest errors, regardless of preparation type. CONCLUSIONS: The preparation type influenced PI trueness, and the IOS system affected PI and SI precisions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The smaller and less complex preparations have greater IOS accuracy than larger and more complex preparations. As the proximal areas are more affected regardless of the preparation, a more accessible proximal area for scanning is desirable. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-08-02 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9804600/ /pubmed/36415928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12949 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Abduo, Jaafar
Laskey, David
Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation
title Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation
title_full Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation
title_fullStr Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation
title_short Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation
title_sort effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12949
work_keys_str_mv AT abduojaafar effectofpreparationtypeontheaccuracyofdifferentintraoralscannersaninvitrostudyatdifferentlevelsofaccuracyevaluation
AT laskeydavid effectofpreparationtypeontheaccuracyofdifferentintraoralscannersaninvitrostudyatdifferentlevelsofaccuracyevaluation