Cargando…

A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris

BACKGROUND: Various treatments for acne vulgaris exist, but little is known about their comparative effectiveness in relation to acne severity. OBJECTIVES: To identify best treatments for mild‐to‐moderate and moderate‐to‐severe acne, as determined by clinician‐assessed morphological features. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia, Daly, Caitlin H., Welton, Nicky J., Deshpande, Shalmali, Berg, Laura, Bromham, Nathan, Arnold, Stephanie, Phillippo, David M., Wilcock, Jane, Xu, Jingyuan, Ravenscroft, Jane C., Wood, Damian, Rafiq, Mohammed, Fou, Linyun, Dworzynski, Katharina, Healy, Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21739
_version_ 1784862176661471232
author Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
Daly, Caitlin H.
Welton, Nicky J.
Deshpande, Shalmali
Berg, Laura
Bromham, Nathan
Arnold, Stephanie
Phillippo, David M.
Wilcock, Jane
Xu, Jingyuan
Ravenscroft, Jane C.
Wood, Damian
Rafiq, Mohammed
Fou, Linyun
Dworzynski, Katharina
Healy, Eugene
author_facet Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
Daly, Caitlin H.
Welton, Nicky J.
Deshpande, Shalmali
Berg, Laura
Bromham, Nathan
Arnold, Stephanie
Phillippo, David M.
Wilcock, Jane
Xu, Jingyuan
Ravenscroft, Jane C.
Wood, Damian
Rafiq, Mohammed
Fou, Linyun
Dworzynski, Katharina
Healy, Eugene
author_sort Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various treatments for acne vulgaris exist, but little is known about their comparative effectiveness in relation to acne severity. OBJECTIVES: To identify best treatments for mild‐to‐moderate and moderate‐to‐severe acne, as determined by clinician‐assessed morphological features. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for mild‐to‐moderate and moderate‐to‐severe acne, published up to May 2020. Outcomes included percentage change in total lesion count from baseline, treatment discontinuation for any reason, and discontinuation owing to side‐effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool and bias adjustment models. Effects for treatments with ≥ 50 observations each compared with placebo are reported below. RESULTS: We included 179 RCTs with approximately 35 000 observations across 49 treatment classes. For mild‐to‐moderate acne, the most effective options for each treatment type were as follows: topical pharmacological – combined retinoid with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) [mean difference 26·16%, 95% credible interval (CrI) 16·75–35·36%]; physical – chemical peels, e.g. salicylic or mandelic acid (39·70%, 95% CrI 12·54–66·78%) and photochemical therapy (combined blue/red light) (35·36%, 95% CrI 17·75–53·08%). Oral pharmacological treatments (e.g. antibiotics, hormonal contraceptives) did not appear to be effective after bias adjustment. BPO and topical retinoids were less well tolerated than placebo. For moderate‐to‐severe acne, the most effective options for each treatment type were as follows: topical pharmacological – combined retinoid with lincosamide (clindamycin) (44·43%, 95% CrI 29·20–60·02%); oral pharmacological – isotretinoin of total cumulative dose ≥ 120 mg kg(−1) per single course (58·09%, 95% CrI 36·99–79·29%); physical – photodynamic therapy (light therapy enhanced by a photosensitizing chemical) (40·45%, 95% CrI 26·17–54·11%); combined – BPO with topical retinoid and oral tetracycline (43·53%, 95% CrI 29·49–57·70%). Topical retinoids and oral tetracyclines were less well tolerated than placebo. The quality of included RCTs was moderate to very low, with evidence of inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence. Uncertainty in findings was high, in particular for chemical peels, photochemical therapy and photodynamic therapy. However, conclusions were robust to potential bias in the evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Topical pharmacological treatment combinations, chemical peels and photochemical therapy were most effective for mild‐to‐moderate acne. Topical pharmacological treatment combinations, oral antibiotics combined with topical pharmacological treatments, oral isotretinoin and photodynamic therapy were most effective for moderate‐to‐severe acne. Further research is warranted for chemical peels, photochemical therapy and photodynamic therapy for which evidence was more limited. What is already known about this topic? Acne vulgaris is the eighth most common disease globally. Several topical, oral, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris exist. Network meta‐analysis (NMA) synthesizes direct and indirect evidence and allows simultaneous inference for all treatments forming an evidence network. Previous NMAs have assessed a limited range of treatments for acne vulgaris and have not evaluated effectiveness of treatments for moderate‐to‐severe acne. What does this study add? For mild‐to‐moderate acne, topical treatment combinations, chemical peels, and photochemical therapy (combined blue/red light; blue light) are most effective. For moderate‐to‐severe acne, topical treatment combinations, oral antibiotics combined with topical treatments, oral isotretinoin and photodynamic therapy (light therapy enhanced by a photosensitizing chemical) are most effective. Based on these findings, along with further clinical and cost‐effectiveness considerations, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends, as first‐line treatments, fixed topical treatment combinations for mild‐to‐moderate acne and fixed topical treatment combinations, or oral tetracyclines combined with topical treatments, for moderate‐to‐severe acne.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9804728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98047282023-01-06 A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia Daly, Caitlin H. Welton, Nicky J. Deshpande, Shalmali Berg, Laura Bromham, Nathan Arnold, Stephanie Phillippo, David M. Wilcock, Jane Xu, Jingyuan Ravenscroft, Jane C. Wood, Damian Rafiq, Mohammed Fou, Linyun Dworzynski, Katharina Healy, Eugene Br J Dermatol Evidence‐Based Dermatology BACKGROUND: Various treatments for acne vulgaris exist, but little is known about their comparative effectiveness in relation to acne severity. OBJECTIVES: To identify best treatments for mild‐to‐moderate and moderate‐to‐severe acne, as determined by clinician‐assessed morphological features. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for mild‐to‐moderate and moderate‐to‐severe acne, published up to May 2020. Outcomes included percentage change in total lesion count from baseline, treatment discontinuation for any reason, and discontinuation owing to side‐effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk‐of‐bias tool and bias adjustment models. Effects for treatments with ≥ 50 observations each compared with placebo are reported below. RESULTS: We included 179 RCTs with approximately 35 000 observations across 49 treatment classes. For mild‐to‐moderate acne, the most effective options for each treatment type were as follows: topical pharmacological – combined retinoid with benzoyl peroxide (BPO) [mean difference 26·16%, 95% credible interval (CrI) 16·75–35·36%]; physical – chemical peels, e.g. salicylic or mandelic acid (39·70%, 95% CrI 12·54–66·78%) and photochemical therapy (combined blue/red light) (35·36%, 95% CrI 17·75–53·08%). Oral pharmacological treatments (e.g. antibiotics, hormonal contraceptives) did not appear to be effective after bias adjustment. BPO and topical retinoids were less well tolerated than placebo. For moderate‐to‐severe acne, the most effective options for each treatment type were as follows: topical pharmacological – combined retinoid with lincosamide (clindamycin) (44·43%, 95% CrI 29·20–60·02%); oral pharmacological – isotretinoin of total cumulative dose ≥ 120 mg kg(−1) per single course (58·09%, 95% CrI 36·99–79·29%); physical – photodynamic therapy (light therapy enhanced by a photosensitizing chemical) (40·45%, 95% CrI 26·17–54·11%); combined – BPO with topical retinoid and oral tetracycline (43·53%, 95% CrI 29·49–57·70%). Topical retinoids and oral tetracyclines were less well tolerated than placebo. The quality of included RCTs was moderate to very low, with evidence of inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence. Uncertainty in findings was high, in particular for chemical peels, photochemical therapy and photodynamic therapy. However, conclusions were robust to potential bias in the evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Topical pharmacological treatment combinations, chemical peels and photochemical therapy were most effective for mild‐to‐moderate acne. Topical pharmacological treatment combinations, oral antibiotics combined with topical pharmacological treatments, oral isotretinoin and photodynamic therapy were most effective for moderate‐to‐severe acne. Further research is warranted for chemical peels, photochemical therapy and photodynamic therapy for which evidence was more limited. What is already known about this topic? Acne vulgaris is the eighth most common disease globally. Several topical, oral, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris exist. Network meta‐analysis (NMA) synthesizes direct and indirect evidence and allows simultaneous inference for all treatments forming an evidence network. Previous NMAs have assessed a limited range of treatments for acne vulgaris and have not evaluated effectiveness of treatments for moderate‐to‐severe acne. What does this study add? For mild‐to‐moderate acne, topical treatment combinations, chemical peels, and photochemical therapy (combined blue/red light; blue light) are most effective. For moderate‐to‐severe acne, topical treatment combinations, oral antibiotics combined with topical treatments, oral isotretinoin and photodynamic therapy (light therapy enhanced by a photosensitizing chemical) are most effective. Based on these findings, along with further clinical and cost‐effectiveness considerations, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends, as first‐line treatments, fixed topical treatment combinations for mild‐to‐moderate acne and fixed topical treatment combinations, or oral tetracyclines combined with topical treatments, for moderate‐to‐severe acne. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-22 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9804728/ /pubmed/35789996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21739 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Evidence‐Based Dermatology
Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
Daly, Caitlin H.
Welton, Nicky J.
Deshpande, Shalmali
Berg, Laura
Bromham, Nathan
Arnold, Stephanie
Phillippo, David M.
Wilcock, Jane
Xu, Jingyuan
Ravenscroft, Jane C.
Wood, Damian
Rafiq, Mohammed
Fou, Linyun
Dworzynski, Katharina
Healy, Eugene
A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris
title A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris
title_full A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris
title_fullStr A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris
title_short A systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris
title_sort systematic review and network meta‐analysis of topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for acne vulgaris
topic Evidence‐Based Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35789996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21739
work_keys_str_mv AT mavranezouliifigeneia asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT dalycaitlinh asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT weltonnickyj asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT deshpandeshalmali asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT berglaura asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT bromhamnathan asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT arnoldstephanie asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT phillippodavidm asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT wilcockjane asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT xujingyuan asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT ravenscroftjanec asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT wooddamian asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT rafiqmohammed asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT foulinyun asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT dworzynskikatharina asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT healyeugene asystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT mavranezouliifigeneia systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT dalycaitlinh systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT weltonnickyj systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT deshpandeshalmali systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT berglaura systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT bromhamnathan systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT arnoldstephanie systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT phillippodavidm systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT wilcockjane systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT xujingyuan systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT ravenscroftjanec systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT wooddamian systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT rafiqmohammed systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT foulinyun systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT dworzynskikatharina systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris
AT healyeugene systematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisoftopicalpharmacologicaloralpharmacologicalphysicalandcombinedtreatmentsforacnevulgaris