Cargando…

Isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma patients with high‐risk cytogenetics: IKEMA subgroup analysis

INTRODUCTION: The presence of high‐risk chromosomal abnormalities [t(4;14), del(17p), and t(14;16)] has been linked with inferior outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A prespecified interim analysis of the Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated that isatuximab (Isa) + carfilzomib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spicka, Ivan, Moreau, Philippe, Martin, Thomas G., Facon, Thierry, Martinez, Gracia, Oriol, Albert, Koh, Youngil, Lim, Andrew, Mikala, Gabor, Rosiñol, Laura, Yağci, Münci, Cavo, Michele, Risse, Marie‐Laure, Asset, Gaëlle, Macé, Sandrine, van de Velde, Helgi, Yong, Kwee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35871357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13835
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The presence of high‐risk chromosomal abnormalities [t(4;14), del(17p), and t(14;16)] has been linked with inferior outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A prespecified interim analysis of the Phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285) demonstrated that isatuximab (Isa) + carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d; Isa‐Kd) significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) versus Kd in patients with relapsed MM. This prespecified subgroup analysis of IKEMA examined efficacy and safety in patients with high‐risk cytogenetics. METHODS: High‐risk cytogenetics was assessed by central laboratory and patients were classified as high risk if abnormalities were present in ≥1 of the following: del(17p): 50% cutoff; t(4;14), and/or t(14;16): 30% cutoff. RESULTS: Of the randomized patients, 23.5% (Isa‐Kd) and 25.2% (Kd) had ≥1 high‐risk chromosomal abnormality. A PFS benefit was seen in favor of Isa‐Kd for patients with standard‐risk (HR 0.440; 95% CI 0.266–0.728) and high‐risk cytogenetics (HR 0.724; 95% CI 0.361–1.451). Grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more common with Isa‐Kd (85.7%) versus Kd (63.3%) in patients with high‐risk cytogenetics; however, the incidence of serious TEAEs (64.3% vs. 66.7%) was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Isa‐Kd is a new treatment option for the difficult‐to‐treat subgroup of patients with relapsed MM and high‐risk cytogenetics.