Cargando…

Revisiting Formal Copper(III) Complexes: Bridging Perspectives with Quasi‐d ( 10 ) Configurations

The formal Cu(III) complex [Cu(CF(3))(4)](1−) has often served as a paradigmatic example of challenging oxidation state assignment – with many reports proposing conflicting descriptions. Here we report a computational analysis of this compound, employing Energy Decomposition Analysis and Intrinsic B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leach, Isaac F., Havenith, Remco W. A., Klein, Johannes E. M. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202200247
_version_ 1784862182494699520
author Leach, Isaac F.
Havenith, Remco W. A.
Klein, Johannes E. M. N.
author_facet Leach, Isaac F.
Havenith, Remco W. A.
Klein, Johannes E. M. N.
author_sort Leach, Isaac F.
collection PubMed
description The formal Cu(III) complex [Cu(CF(3))(4)](1−) has often served as a paradigmatic example of challenging oxidation state assignment – with many reports proposing conflicting descriptions. Here we report a computational analysis of this compound, employing Energy Decomposition Analysis and Intrinsic Bond Orbital Analysis. We present a quasi‐d ( 10 ) perspective of the metal centre, resulting from ambiguities in d‐electron counting. The implications for describing reactions which undergo oxidation state changes, such as the formal reductive elimination from the analogous [Cu(CF(3))(3)(CH(2)Ph)](1−) complex (Paeth et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 3153), are probed. Electron flow analysis finds that the changes in electronic structure may be understood as a quasi‐d ( 10 ) to d ( 10 ) transition at the metal centre, rendering this process essentially redox neutral. This is reminiscent of a previously studied formal Ni(IV) complex (Steen et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 13133–13139), and indicates that our description of electronic structure has implications for the understanding of elementary organometallic reaction steps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9804752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98047522023-01-06 Revisiting Formal Copper(III) Complexes: Bridging Perspectives with Quasi‐d ( 10 ) Configurations Leach, Isaac F. Havenith, Remco W. A. Klein, Johannes E. M. N. Eur J Inorg Chem Perspectives The formal Cu(III) complex [Cu(CF(3))(4)](1−) has often served as a paradigmatic example of challenging oxidation state assignment – with many reports proposing conflicting descriptions. Here we report a computational analysis of this compound, employing Energy Decomposition Analysis and Intrinsic Bond Orbital Analysis. We present a quasi‐d ( 10 ) perspective of the metal centre, resulting from ambiguities in d‐electron counting. The implications for describing reactions which undergo oxidation state changes, such as the formal reductive elimination from the analogous [Cu(CF(3))(3)(CH(2)Ph)](1−) complex (Paeth et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 3153), are probed. Electron flow analysis finds that the changes in electronic structure may be understood as a quasi‐d ( 10 ) to d ( 10 ) transition at the metal centre, rendering this process essentially redox neutral. This is reminiscent of a previously studied formal Ni(IV) complex (Steen et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 13133–13139), and indicates that our description of electronic structure has implications for the understanding of elementary organometallic reaction steps. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-23 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9804752/ /pubmed/36619312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202200247 Text en © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry published by Wiley-VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Perspectives
Leach, Isaac F.
Havenith, Remco W. A.
Klein, Johannes E. M. N.
Revisiting Formal Copper(III) Complexes: Bridging Perspectives with Quasi‐d ( 10 ) Configurations
title Revisiting Formal Copper(III) Complexes: Bridging Perspectives with Quasi‐d ( 10 ) Configurations
title_full Revisiting Formal Copper(III) Complexes: Bridging Perspectives with Quasi‐d ( 10 ) Configurations
title_fullStr Revisiting Formal Copper(III) Complexes: Bridging Perspectives with Quasi‐d ( 10 ) Configurations
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting Formal Copper(III) Complexes: Bridging Perspectives with Quasi‐d ( 10 ) Configurations
title_short Revisiting Formal Copper(III) Complexes: Bridging Perspectives with Quasi‐d ( 10 ) Configurations
title_sort revisiting formal copper(iii) complexes: bridging perspectives with quasi‐d ( 10 ) configurations
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36619312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202200247
work_keys_str_mv AT leachisaacf revisitingformalcopperiiicomplexesbridgingperspectiveswithquasid10configurations
AT havenithremcowa revisitingformalcopperiiicomplexesbridgingperspectiveswithquasid10configurations
AT kleinjohannesemn revisitingformalcopperiiicomplexesbridgingperspectiveswithquasid10configurations