Cargando…

Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36

Pesticide action is predominantly measured as a toxicological outcome, with pharmacological impact of sublethal doses on bystander species left largely undocumented. Likewise, chronic exposure, which often results in responses different from acute administration, has also been understudied. In this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connolly, Christopher N., Alexander, Stephen P. H., Davies, Jamie A., Spedding, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15933
_version_ 1784862220308447232
author Connolly, Christopher N.
Alexander, Stephen P. H.
Davies, Jamie A.
Spedding, Michael
author_facet Connolly, Christopher N.
Alexander, Stephen P. H.
Davies, Jamie A.
Spedding, Michael
author_sort Connolly, Christopher N.
collection PubMed
description Pesticide action is predominantly measured as a toxicological outcome, with pharmacological impact of sublethal doses on bystander species left largely undocumented. Likewise, chronic exposure, which often results in responses different from acute administration, has also been understudied. In this article, we propose the application of standard pharmacological principles, already used to establish safe clinical dosing regimens in humans, to the ‘dosing of the environment’. These principles include relating the steady state dose of an agent to its beneficial effects (e.g. pest control), while minimising harmful impacts (e.g. off‐target bioactivity in beneficial insects). We propose the term ‘environmental therapeutic window’, analogous to that used in mammalian pharmacology, to guide risk assessment. To make pharmacological terms practically useful to environmental protection, quantitative data on pesticide action need to be made available in a freely accessible database, which should include toxicological and pharmacological impacts on both target and off‐target species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9804906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98049062023-01-06 Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36 Connolly, Christopher N. Alexander, Stephen P. H. Davies, Jamie A. Spedding, Michael Br J Pharmacol Perspective Pesticide action is predominantly measured as a toxicological outcome, with pharmacological impact of sublethal doses on bystander species left largely undocumented. Likewise, chronic exposure, which often results in responses different from acute administration, has also been understudied. In this article, we propose the application of standard pharmacological principles, already used to establish safe clinical dosing regimens in humans, to the ‘dosing of the environment’. These principles include relating the steady state dose of an agent to its beneficial effects (e.g. pest control), while minimising harmful impacts (e.g. off‐target bioactivity in beneficial insects). We propose the term ‘environmental therapeutic window’, analogous to that used in mammalian pharmacology, to guide risk assessment. To make pharmacological terms practically useful to environmental protection, quantitative data on pesticide action need to be made available in a freely accessible database, which should include toxicological and pharmacological impacts on both target and off‐target species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9804906/ /pubmed/35975296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15933 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Perspective
Connolly, Christopher N.
Alexander, Stephen P. H.
Davies, Jamie A.
Spedding, Michael
Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36
title Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36
title_full Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36
title_fullStr Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36
title_full_unstemmed Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36
title_short Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36
title_sort environmental pharmacology—dosing the environment: iuphar review 36
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15933
work_keys_str_mv AT connollychristophern environmentalpharmacologydosingtheenvironmentiupharreview36
AT alexanderstephenph environmentalpharmacologydosingtheenvironmentiupharreview36
AT daviesjamiea environmentalpharmacologydosingtheenvironmentiupharreview36
AT speddingmichael environmentalpharmacologydosingtheenvironmentiupharreview36