Cargando…
Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36
Pesticide action is predominantly measured as a toxicological outcome, with pharmacological impact of sublethal doses on bystander species left largely undocumented. Likewise, chronic exposure, which often results in responses different from acute administration, has also been understudied. In this...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15933 |
_version_ | 1784862220308447232 |
---|---|
author | Connolly, Christopher N. Alexander, Stephen P. H. Davies, Jamie A. Spedding, Michael |
author_facet | Connolly, Christopher N. Alexander, Stephen P. H. Davies, Jamie A. Spedding, Michael |
author_sort | Connolly, Christopher N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pesticide action is predominantly measured as a toxicological outcome, with pharmacological impact of sublethal doses on bystander species left largely undocumented. Likewise, chronic exposure, which often results in responses different from acute administration, has also been understudied. In this article, we propose the application of standard pharmacological principles, already used to establish safe clinical dosing regimens in humans, to the ‘dosing of the environment’. These principles include relating the steady state dose of an agent to its beneficial effects (e.g. pest control), while minimising harmful impacts (e.g. off‐target bioactivity in beneficial insects). We propose the term ‘environmental therapeutic window’, analogous to that used in mammalian pharmacology, to guide risk assessment. To make pharmacological terms practically useful to environmental protection, quantitative data on pesticide action need to be made available in a freely accessible database, which should include toxicological and pharmacological impacts on both target and off‐target species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9804906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98049062023-01-06 Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36 Connolly, Christopher N. Alexander, Stephen P. H. Davies, Jamie A. Spedding, Michael Br J Pharmacol Perspective Pesticide action is predominantly measured as a toxicological outcome, with pharmacological impact of sublethal doses on bystander species left largely undocumented. Likewise, chronic exposure, which often results in responses different from acute administration, has also been understudied. In this article, we propose the application of standard pharmacological principles, already used to establish safe clinical dosing regimens in humans, to the ‘dosing of the environment’. These principles include relating the steady state dose of an agent to its beneficial effects (e.g. pest control), while minimising harmful impacts (e.g. off‐target bioactivity in beneficial insects). We propose the term ‘environmental therapeutic window’, analogous to that used in mammalian pharmacology, to guide risk assessment. To make pharmacological terms practically useful to environmental protection, quantitative data on pesticide action need to be made available in a freely accessible database, which should include toxicological and pharmacological impacts on both target and off‐target species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-16 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9804906/ /pubmed/35975296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15933 Text en © 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Connolly, Christopher N. Alexander, Stephen P. H. Davies, Jamie A. Spedding, Michael Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36 |
title | Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36 |
title_full | Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36 |
title_fullStr | Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36 |
title_full_unstemmed | Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36 |
title_short | Environmental pharmacology—Dosing the environment: IUPHAR review 36 |
title_sort | environmental pharmacology—dosing the environment: iuphar review 36 |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35975296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.15933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT connollychristophern environmentalpharmacologydosingtheenvironmentiupharreview36 AT alexanderstephenph environmentalpharmacologydosingtheenvironmentiupharreview36 AT daviesjamiea environmentalpharmacologydosingtheenvironmentiupharreview36 AT speddingmichael environmentalpharmacologydosingtheenvironmentiupharreview36 |