Cargando…

Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types

Mesophyll conductance (g (m)) limits photosynthesis by restricting CO(2) diffusion between the substomatal cavities and chloroplasts. Although it is known that g (m) is determined by both leaf anatomical and biochemical traits, their relative contribution across plant functional types (PFTs) is stil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knauer, Jürgen, Cuntz, Matthias, Evans, John R., Niinemets, Ülo, Tosens, Tiina, Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa, Werner, Christiane, Zaehle, Sönke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18363
_version_ 1784862242111488000
author Knauer, Jürgen
Cuntz, Matthias
Evans, John R.
Niinemets, Ülo
Tosens, Tiina
Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa
Werner, Christiane
Zaehle, Sönke
author_facet Knauer, Jürgen
Cuntz, Matthias
Evans, John R.
Niinemets, Ülo
Tosens, Tiina
Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa
Werner, Christiane
Zaehle, Sönke
author_sort Knauer, Jürgen
collection PubMed
description Mesophyll conductance (g (m)) limits photosynthesis by restricting CO(2) diffusion between the substomatal cavities and chloroplasts. Although it is known that g (m) is determined by both leaf anatomical and biochemical traits, their relative contribution across plant functional types (PFTs) is still unclear. We compiled a dataset of g (m) measurements and concomitant leaf traits in unstressed plants comprising 563 studies and 617 species from all major PFTs. We investigated to what extent g (m) limits photosynthesis across PFTs, how g (m) relates to structural, anatomical, biochemical, and physiological leaf properties, and whether these relationships differ among PFTs. We found that g (m) imposes a significant limitation to photosynthesis in all C(3) PFTs, ranging from 10–30% in most herbaceous annuals to 25–50% in woody evergreens. Anatomical leaf traits explained a significant proportion of the variation in g (m) (R (2) > 0.3) in all PFTs except annual herbs, in which g (m) is more strongly related to biochemical factors associated with leaf nitrogen and potassium content. Our results underline the need to elucidate mechanisms underlying the global variability of g (m). We emphasise the underestimated potential of g (m) for improving photosynthesis in crops and identify modifications in leaf biochemistry as the most promising pathway for increasing g (m) in these species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9804998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98049982023-01-06 Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types Knauer, Jürgen Cuntz, Matthias Evans, John R. Niinemets, Ülo Tosens, Tiina Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa Werner, Christiane Zaehle, Sönke New Phytol Research Mesophyll conductance (g (m)) limits photosynthesis by restricting CO(2) diffusion between the substomatal cavities and chloroplasts. Although it is known that g (m) is determined by both leaf anatomical and biochemical traits, their relative contribution across plant functional types (PFTs) is still unclear. We compiled a dataset of g (m) measurements and concomitant leaf traits in unstressed plants comprising 563 studies and 617 species from all major PFTs. We investigated to what extent g (m) limits photosynthesis across PFTs, how g (m) relates to structural, anatomical, biochemical, and physiological leaf properties, and whether these relationships differ among PFTs. We found that g (m) imposes a significant limitation to photosynthesis in all C(3) PFTs, ranging from 10–30% in most herbaceous annuals to 25–50% in woody evergreens. Anatomical leaf traits explained a significant proportion of the variation in g (m) (R (2) > 0.3) in all PFTs except annual herbs, in which g (m) is more strongly related to biochemical factors associated with leaf nitrogen and potassium content. Our results underline the need to elucidate mechanisms underlying the global variability of g (m). We emphasise the underestimated potential of g (m) for improving photosynthesis in crops and identify modifications in leaf biochemistry as the most promising pathway for increasing g (m) in these species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-02 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9804998/ /pubmed/35801854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18363 Text en © 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Knauer, Jürgen
Cuntz, Matthias
Evans, John R.
Niinemets, Ülo
Tosens, Tiina
Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa
Werner, Christiane
Zaehle, Sönke
Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types
title Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types
title_full Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types
title_fullStr Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types
title_short Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types
title_sort contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18363
work_keys_str_mv AT knauerjurgen contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes
AT cuntzmatthias contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes
AT evansjohnr contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes
AT niinemetsulo contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes
AT tosenstiina contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes
AT veromannjurgensonlindaliisa contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes
AT wernerchristiane contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes
AT zaehlesonke contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes