Cargando…
Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types
Mesophyll conductance (g (m)) limits photosynthesis by restricting CO(2) diffusion between the substomatal cavities and chloroplasts. Although it is known that g (m) is determined by both leaf anatomical and biochemical traits, their relative contribution across plant functional types (PFTs) is stil...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18363 |
_version_ | 1784862242111488000 |
---|---|
author | Knauer, Jürgen Cuntz, Matthias Evans, John R. Niinemets, Ülo Tosens, Tiina Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa Werner, Christiane Zaehle, Sönke |
author_facet | Knauer, Jürgen Cuntz, Matthias Evans, John R. Niinemets, Ülo Tosens, Tiina Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa Werner, Christiane Zaehle, Sönke |
author_sort | Knauer, Jürgen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mesophyll conductance (g (m)) limits photosynthesis by restricting CO(2) diffusion between the substomatal cavities and chloroplasts. Although it is known that g (m) is determined by both leaf anatomical and biochemical traits, their relative contribution across plant functional types (PFTs) is still unclear. We compiled a dataset of g (m) measurements and concomitant leaf traits in unstressed plants comprising 563 studies and 617 species from all major PFTs. We investigated to what extent g (m) limits photosynthesis across PFTs, how g (m) relates to structural, anatomical, biochemical, and physiological leaf properties, and whether these relationships differ among PFTs. We found that g (m) imposes a significant limitation to photosynthesis in all C(3) PFTs, ranging from 10–30% in most herbaceous annuals to 25–50% in woody evergreens. Anatomical leaf traits explained a significant proportion of the variation in g (m) (R (2) > 0.3) in all PFTs except annual herbs, in which g (m) is more strongly related to biochemical factors associated with leaf nitrogen and potassium content. Our results underline the need to elucidate mechanisms underlying the global variability of g (m). We emphasise the underestimated potential of g (m) for improving photosynthesis in crops and identify modifications in leaf biochemistry as the most promising pathway for increasing g (m) in these species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9804998 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98049982023-01-06 Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types Knauer, Jürgen Cuntz, Matthias Evans, John R. Niinemets, Ülo Tosens, Tiina Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa Werner, Christiane Zaehle, Sönke New Phytol Research Mesophyll conductance (g (m)) limits photosynthesis by restricting CO(2) diffusion between the substomatal cavities and chloroplasts. Although it is known that g (m) is determined by both leaf anatomical and biochemical traits, their relative contribution across plant functional types (PFTs) is still unclear. We compiled a dataset of g (m) measurements and concomitant leaf traits in unstressed plants comprising 563 studies and 617 species from all major PFTs. We investigated to what extent g (m) limits photosynthesis across PFTs, how g (m) relates to structural, anatomical, biochemical, and physiological leaf properties, and whether these relationships differ among PFTs. We found that g (m) imposes a significant limitation to photosynthesis in all C(3) PFTs, ranging from 10–30% in most herbaceous annuals to 25–50% in woody evergreens. Anatomical leaf traits explained a significant proportion of the variation in g (m) (R (2) > 0.3) in all PFTs except annual herbs, in which g (m) is more strongly related to biochemical factors associated with leaf nitrogen and potassium content. Our results underline the need to elucidate mechanisms underlying the global variability of g (m). We emphasise the underestimated potential of g (m) for improving photosynthesis in crops and identify modifications in leaf biochemistry as the most promising pathway for increasing g (m) in these species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-02 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9804998/ /pubmed/35801854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18363 Text en © 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Knauer, Jürgen Cuntz, Matthias Evans, John R. Niinemets, Ülo Tosens, Tiina Veromann‐Jürgenson, Linda‐Liisa Werner, Christiane Zaehle, Sönke Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types |
title | Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types |
title_full | Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types |
title_fullStr | Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types |
title_short | Contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types |
title_sort | contrasting anatomical and biochemical controls on mesophyll conductance across plant functional types |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804998/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35801854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18363 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knauerjurgen contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes AT cuntzmatthias contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes AT evansjohnr contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes AT niinemetsulo contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes AT tosenstiina contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes AT veromannjurgensonlindaliisa contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes AT wernerchristiane contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes AT zaehlesonke contrastinganatomicalandbiochemicalcontrolsonmesophyllconductanceacrossplantfunctionaltypes |