Cargando…
Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?
Denmark has experienced an increase in the proportion of invasive vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) since 2002 (e.g. <4% in 2015, 7.1% in 2017 and 12% in 2018). At Rigshospitalet, we employ active screening at departments with high prevalence or in case of outbreaks. This includes t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apm.13263 |
_version_ | 1784862254034845696 |
---|---|
author | Hertz, Frederik Boetius Nielsen, Karen Leth Olsen, Markus Harboe Ebdrup, Søren Røddik Nielsen, Christina Kirkby, Nikolai Soren Frimodt‐Møller, Niels Møller, Kirsten |
author_facet | Hertz, Frederik Boetius Nielsen, Karen Leth Olsen, Markus Harboe Ebdrup, Søren Røddik Nielsen, Christina Kirkby, Nikolai Soren Frimodt‐Møller, Niels Møller, Kirsten |
author_sort | Hertz, Frederik Boetius |
collection | PubMed |
description | Denmark has experienced an increase in the proportion of invasive vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) since 2002 (e.g. <4% in 2015, 7.1% in 2017 and 12% in 2018). At Rigshospitalet, we employ active screening at departments with high prevalence or in case of outbreaks. This includes the collection of rectal swabs specifically for VRE screening. Our purpose was to describe the carrier prevalence of vancomycin‐resistant enterococci among acute patients admitted to the Neurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (NICU). Between April 2018 and January 2019, we investigated 99 consecutive rectal swabs from patients admitted to NICU. The primary outcome was prevalence of VRE carriage. The median age was 64 years (range 23–87) and gender was equally distributed (Female = 47, Male = 46). 26 (28%) had previously been admitted within 179 days and 67 patients (72%) had no hospital admissions within 180 days prior to the admission to NICU. Of the 93 rectal swabs, 2 (2%, 95% CI 0.26–7.55%) were positive for vanA and none were positive for vanB. Routine screening of all patients at admission may be effective in hospital settings with high VRE prevalence, whereas the benefit of screening for VRE in hospitals with a low prevalence may be restricted to specific patient populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9805049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98050492023-01-06 Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? Hertz, Frederik Boetius Nielsen, Karen Leth Olsen, Markus Harboe Ebdrup, Søren Røddik Nielsen, Christina Kirkby, Nikolai Soren Frimodt‐Møller, Niels Møller, Kirsten APMIS Short Communication Denmark has experienced an increase in the proportion of invasive vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) since 2002 (e.g. <4% in 2015, 7.1% in 2017 and 12% in 2018). At Rigshospitalet, we employ active screening at departments with high prevalence or in case of outbreaks. This includes the collection of rectal swabs specifically for VRE screening. Our purpose was to describe the carrier prevalence of vancomycin‐resistant enterococci among acute patients admitted to the Neurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (NICU). Between April 2018 and January 2019, we investigated 99 consecutive rectal swabs from patients admitted to NICU. The primary outcome was prevalence of VRE carriage. The median age was 64 years (range 23–87) and gender was equally distributed (Female = 47, Male = 46). 26 (28%) had previously been admitted within 179 days and 67 patients (72%) had no hospital admissions within 180 days prior to the admission to NICU. Of the 93 rectal swabs, 2 (2%, 95% CI 0.26–7.55%) were positive for vanA and none were positive for vanB. Routine screening of all patients at admission may be effective in hospital settings with high VRE prevalence, whereas the benefit of screening for VRE in hospitals with a low prevalence may be restricted to specific patient populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-26 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9805049/ /pubmed/35851968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apm.13263 Text en © 2022 The Authors. APMIS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Hertz, Frederik Boetius Nielsen, Karen Leth Olsen, Markus Harboe Ebdrup, Søren Røddik Nielsen, Christina Kirkby, Nikolai Soren Frimodt‐Møller, Niels Møller, Kirsten Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? |
title | Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? |
title_full | Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? |
title_fullStr | Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? |
title_full_unstemmed | Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? |
title_short | Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? |
title_sort | vancomycin‐resistant enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apm.13263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hertzfrederikboetius vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission AT nielsenkarenleth vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission AT olsenmarkusharboe vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission AT ebdrupsørenrøddik vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission AT nielsenchristina vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission AT kirkbynikolaisoren vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission AT frimodtmøllerniels vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission AT møllerkirsten vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission |