Cargando…

Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?

Denmark has experienced an increase in the proportion of invasive vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) since 2002 (e.g. <4% in 2015, 7.1% in 2017 and 12% in 2018). At Rigshospitalet, we employ active screening at departments with high prevalence or in case of outbreaks. This includes t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hertz, Frederik Boetius, Nielsen, Karen Leth, Olsen, Markus Harboe, Ebdrup, Søren Røddik, Nielsen, Christina, Kirkby, Nikolai Soren, Frimodt‐Møller, Niels, Møller, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apm.13263
_version_ 1784862254034845696
author Hertz, Frederik Boetius
Nielsen, Karen Leth
Olsen, Markus Harboe
Ebdrup, Søren Røddik
Nielsen, Christina
Kirkby, Nikolai Soren
Frimodt‐Møller, Niels
Møller, Kirsten
author_facet Hertz, Frederik Boetius
Nielsen, Karen Leth
Olsen, Markus Harboe
Ebdrup, Søren Røddik
Nielsen, Christina
Kirkby, Nikolai Soren
Frimodt‐Møller, Niels
Møller, Kirsten
author_sort Hertz, Frederik Boetius
collection PubMed
description Denmark has experienced an increase in the proportion of invasive vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) since 2002 (e.g. <4% in 2015, 7.1% in 2017 and 12% in 2018). At Rigshospitalet, we employ active screening at departments with high prevalence or in case of outbreaks. This includes the collection of rectal swabs specifically for VRE screening. Our purpose was to describe the carrier prevalence of vancomycin‐resistant enterococci among acute patients admitted to the Neurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (NICU). Between April 2018 and January 2019, we investigated 99 consecutive rectal swabs from patients admitted to NICU. The primary outcome was prevalence of VRE carriage. The median age was 64 years (range 23–87) and gender was equally distributed (Female = 47, Male = 46). 26 (28%) had previously been admitted within 179 days and 67 patients (72%) had no hospital admissions within 180 days prior to the admission to NICU. Of the 93 rectal swabs, 2 (2%, 95% CI 0.26–7.55%) were positive for vanA and none were positive for vanB. Routine screening of all patients at admission may be effective in hospital settings with high VRE prevalence, whereas the benefit of screening for VRE in hospitals with a low prevalence may be restricted to specific patient populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9805049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98050492023-01-06 Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission? Hertz, Frederik Boetius Nielsen, Karen Leth Olsen, Markus Harboe Ebdrup, Søren Røddik Nielsen, Christina Kirkby, Nikolai Soren Frimodt‐Møller, Niels Møller, Kirsten APMIS Short Communication Denmark has experienced an increase in the proportion of invasive vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) since 2002 (e.g. <4% in 2015, 7.1% in 2017 and 12% in 2018). At Rigshospitalet, we employ active screening at departments with high prevalence or in case of outbreaks. This includes the collection of rectal swabs specifically for VRE screening. Our purpose was to describe the carrier prevalence of vancomycin‐resistant enterococci among acute patients admitted to the Neurointensive Care Unit, Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (NICU). Between April 2018 and January 2019, we investigated 99 consecutive rectal swabs from patients admitted to NICU. The primary outcome was prevalence of VRE carriage. The median age was 64 years (range 23–87) and gender was equally distributed (Female = 47, Male = 46). 26 (28%) had previously been admitted within 179 days and 67 patients (72%) had no hospital admissions within 180 days prior to the admission to NICU. Of the 93 rectal swabs, 2 (2%, 95% CI 0.26–7.55%) were positive for vanA and none were positive for vanB. Routine screening of all patients at admission may be effective in hospital settings with high VRE prevalence, whereas the benefit of screening for VRE in hospitals with a low prevalence may be restricted to specific patient populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-26 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9805049/ /pubmed/35851968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apm.13263 Text en © 2022 The Authors. APMIS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Hertz, Frederik Boetius
Nielsen, Karen Leth
Olsen, Markus Harboe
Ebdrup, Søren Røddik
Nielsen, Christina
Kirkby, Nikolai Soren
Frimodt‐Møller, Niels
Møller, Kirsten
Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?
title Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?
title_full Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?
title_fullStr Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?
title_full_unstemmed Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?
title_short Vancomycin‐resistant Enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?
title_sort vancomycin‐resistant enterococcus faecium: should we screen on admission?
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apm.13263
work_keys_str_mv AT hertzfrederikboetius vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission
AT nielsenkarenleth vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission
AT olsenmarkusharboe vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission
AT ebdrupsørenrøddik vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission
AT nielsenchristina vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission
AT kirkbynikolaisoren vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission
AT frimodtmøllerniels vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission
AT møllerkirsten vancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumshouldwescreenonadmission