Cargando…
Barium Sulfate Deposition in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Review of the literature
BACKGROUND: Barium sulfate is utilized for imaging of the gastrointestinal tract and is usually not deposited within the wall of the intestine. It is thought that mucosal injury may allow barium sulfate to traverse the mucosa, and allow deposition to occur uncommonly. Most pathology textbooks descri...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36585714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-022-01283-8 |
_version_ | 1784862254283358208 |
---|---|
author | Zaccarini, Daniel J. Lubin, David Sanyal, Soma Abraham, Jerrold L. |
author_facet | Zaccarini, Daniel J. Lubin, David Sanyal, Soma Abraham, Jerrold L. |
author_sort | Zaccarini, Daniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Barium sulfate is utilized for imaging of the gastrointestinal tract and is usually not deposited within the wall of the intestine. It is thought that mucosal injury may allow barium sulfate to traverse the mucosa, and allow deposition to occur uncommonly. Most pathology textbooks describe the typical barium sulfate deposition pattern as small granular accumulation in macrophages, and do not describe the presence of larger rhomboid crystals. This review will summarize the clinical background, radiographic, gross, and microscopic features of barium sulfate deposition in the gastrointestinal tract. A review of the PubMed database was performed to identify all published cases of barium sulfate deposition in the gastrointestinal tract that have been confirmed by pathologic examination. CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature shows that the most common barium sulfate deposition pattern in the gastrointestinal tract is finely granular deposition (30 previously described cases), and less commonly large rhomboid crystals are seen (19 cases) with or without finely granular deposition. The fine granules are typically located in macrophages, while rhomboid crystals are usually extracellular. There are various methods to support that the foreign material is indeed barium sulfate, however, only a minority of studies perform ancillary testing. Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) can be useful for definitive confirmation. This review emphasizes the importance of recognizing both patterns of barium sulfate deposition, and the histologic differential diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-022-01283-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9805050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98050502023-01-01 Barium Sulfate Deposition in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Review of the literature Zaccarini, Daniel J. Lubin, David Sanyal, Soma Abraham, Jerrold L. Diagn Pathol Review BACKGROUND: Barium sulfate is utilized for imaging of the gastrointestinal tract and is usually not deposited within the wall of the intestine. It is thought that mucosal injury may allow barium sulfate to traverse the mucosa, and allow deposition to occur uncommonly. Most pathology textbooks describe the typical barium sulfate deposition pattern as small granular accumulation in macrophages, and do not describe the presence of larger rhomboid crystals. This review will summarize the clinical background, radiographic, gross, and microscopic features of barium sulfate deposition in the gastrointestinal tract. A review of the PubMed database was performed to identify all published cases of barium sulfate deposition in the gastrointestinal tract that have been confirmed by pathologic examination. CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature shows that the most common barium sulfate deposition pattern in the gastrointestinal tract is finely granular deposition (30 previously described cases), and less commonly large rhomboid crystals are seen (19 cases) with or without finely granular deposition. The fine granules are typically located in macrophages, while rhomboid crystals are usually extracellular. There are various methods to support that the foreign material is indeed barium sulfate, however, only a minority of studies perform ancillary testing. Scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) can be useful for definitive confirmation. This review emphasizes the importance of recognizing both patterns of barium sulfate deposition, and the histologic differential diagnosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-022-01283-8. BioMed Central 2022-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9805050/ /pubmed/36585714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-022-01283-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Zaccarini, Daniel J. Lubin, David Sanyal, Soma Abraham, Jerrold L. Barium Sulfate Deposition in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Review of the literature |
title | Barium Sulfate Deposition in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Review of the literature |
title_full | Barium Sulfate Deposition in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Barium Sulfate Deposition in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Barium Sulfate Deposition in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Review of the literature |
title_short | Barium Sulfate Deposition in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Review of the literature |
title_sort | barium sulfate deposition in the gastrointestinal tract: review of the literature |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36585714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-022-01283-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaccarinidanielj bariumsulfatedepositioninthegastrointestinaltractreviewoftheliterature AT lubindavid bariumsulfatedepositioninthegastrointestinaltractreviewoftheliterature AT sanyalsoma bariumsulfatedepositioninthegastrointestinaltractreviewoftheliterature AT abrahamjerroldl bariumsulfatedepositioninthegastrointestinaltractreviewoftheliterature |