Cargando…

Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of two myopia control contact lenses (CL) compared with a single‐vision (SV) CL. METHODS: Ninety‐five Chinese children with myopia, aged 7–13 years in a 1‐year prospective, randomised, contralateral, cross‐over clinical trial with 3 groups; bilateral SVCL (Group I)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weng, Rebecca, Lan, Weizhong, Bakaraju, Ravi, Conrad, Fabian, Naduvilath, Thomas, Yang, Zhi‐kuan, Sankaridurg, Padmaja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13042
_version_ 1784862259116244992
author Weng, Rebecca
Lan, Weizhong
Bakaraju, Ravi
Conrad, Fabian
Naduvilath, Thomas
Yang, Zhi‐kuan
Sankaridurg, Padmaja
author_facet Weng, Rebecca
Lan, Weizhong
Bakaraju, Ravi
Conrad, Fabian
Naduvilath, Thomas
Yang, Zhi‐kuan
Sankaridurg, Padmaja
author_sort Weng, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of two myopia control contact lenses (CL) compared with a single‐vision (SV) CL. METHODS: Ninety‐five Chinese children with myopia, aged 7–13 years in a 1‐year prospective, randomised, contralateral, cross‐over clinical trial with 3 groups; bilateral SVCL (Group I); randomised, contralateral wear of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) CL and SVCL (Group II) and MiSight® CL and SVCL (Group III). In Groups II and III, CL were crossed over at the 6‐month point (Stage 1) and worn for a further 6 months (Stage 2). Group I wore SVCL during both stages. At baseline and the end of each stage, cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) and axial length (AL) were measured. Six‐monthly ΔSE/ΔAL across groups was analysed using a linear mixed model (CL type, stage, eye and eye* stage included as factors). Intra‐group paired differences between eyes were determined. RESULTS: In Group I, mean (SD) ΔSE/ΔAL with SVCL was −0.41 (0.28) D/0.13 (0.09) mm and −0.25 (0.27) D/0.16 (0.09) mm for stages 1 and 2, with a mean paired difference between eyes of 0.01 D/0.01 mm and 0.05 D/−0.01 mm, respectively. ΔSE/ΔAL with SVCL was similar across Groups I to III (Stage 1: p = 0.89/0.44, Stage 2: p = 0.70/ 0.64). In Groups II and III, ΔSE/ΔAL was lower with the EDOF and MiSight® CL than the contralateral SVCL in 68% to 94% of participants, and adjusted 6‐month ΔSE/ΔAL with EDOF was similar to MiSight® (p = 0.49/0.56 for ΔSE/ΔAL, respectively). Discontinuations across the three groups were high, but not different between the groups (33.3%, 48.4% and 50% for Groups I to III, respectively [p = 0.19]) and most discontinuations occurred immediately after baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Extended depth of focus and MiSight® CL demonstrated similar efficacy in slowing myopia. When switched from a myopia control CL to SVCL, myopia progression was similar to that observed with age‐matched wearers in SVCL and not suggestive of rebound.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9805073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98050732023-01-06 Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design Weng, Rebecca Lan, Weizhong Bakaraju, Ravi Conrad, Fabian Naduvilath, Thomas Yang, Zhi‐kuan Sankaridurg, Padmaja Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Original Article PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of two myopia control contact lenses (CL) compared with a single‐vision (SV) CL. METHODS: Ninety‐five Chinese children with myopia, aged 7–13 years in a 1‐year prospective, randomised, contralateral, cross‐over clinical trial with 3 groups; bilateral SVCL (Group I); randomised, contralateral wear of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) CL and SVCL (Group II) and MiSight® CL and SVCL (Group III). In Groups II and III, CL were crossed over at the 6‐month point (Stage 1) and worn for a further 6 months (Stage 2). Group I wore SVCL during both stages. At baseline and the end of each stage, cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) and axial length (AL) were measured. Six‐monthly ΔSE/ΔAL across groups was analysed using a linear mixed model (CL type, stage, eye and eye* stage included as factors). Intra‐group paired differences between eyes were determined. RESULTS: In Group I, mean (SD) ΔSE/ΔAL with SVCL was −0.41 (0.28) D/0.13 (0.09) mm and −0.25 (0.27) D/0.16 (0.09) mm for stages 1 and 2, with a mean paired difference between eyes of 0.01 D/0.01 mm and 0.05 D/−0.01 mm, respectively. ΔSE/ΔAL with SVCL was similar across Groups I to III (Stage 1: p = 0.89/0.44, Stage 2: p = 0.70/ 0.64). In Groups II and III, ΔSE/ΔAL was lower with the EDOF and MiSight® CL than the contralateral SVCL in 68% to 94% of participants, and adjusted 6‐month ΔSE/ΔAL with EDOF was similar to MiSight® (p = 0.49/0.56 for ΔSE/ΔAL, respectively). Discontinuations across the three groups were high, but not different between the groups (33.3%, 48.4% and 50% for Groups I to III, respectively [p = 0.19]) and most discontinuations occurred immediately after baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Extended depth of focus and MiSight® CL demonstrated similar efficacy in slowing myopia. When switched from a myopia control CL to SVCL, myopia progression was similar to that observed with age‐matched wearers in SVCL and not suggestive of rebound. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-25 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9805073/ /pubmed/36006761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13042 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Weng, Rebecca
Lan, Weizhong
Bakaraju, Ravi
Conrad, Fabian
Naduvilath, Thomas
Yang, Zhi‐kuan
Sankaridurg, Padmaja
Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design
title Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design
title_full Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design
title_fullStr Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design
title_short Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design
title_sort efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: insights from a randomised, contralateral study design
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13042
work_keys_str_mv AT wengrebecca efficacyofcontactlensesformyopiacontrolinsightsfromarandomisedcontralateralstudydesign
AT lanweizhong efficacyofcontactlensesformyopiacontrolinsightsfromarandomisedcontralateralstudydesign
AT bakarajuravi efficacyofcontactlensesformyopiacontrolinsightsfromarandomisedcontralateralstudydesign
AT conradfabian efficacyofcontactlensesformyopiacontrolinsightsfromarandomisedcontralateralstudydesign
AT naduvilaththomas efficacyofcontactlensesformyopiacontrolinsightsfromarandomisedcontralateralstudydesign
AT yangzhikuan efficacyofcontactlensesformyopiacontrolinsightsfromarandomisedcontralateralstudydesign
AT sankaridurgpadmaja efficacyofcontactlensesformyopiacontrolinsightsfromarandomisedcontralateralstudydesign