Cargando…

Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files

INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most commonly isolated bacterium from infected root canals. It is found in the form of a biofilm, which makes it more resistant to antimicrobials, and requires optimal chemomechanical strategies to maximize root canal disinfection. AIM: To eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamed, Sarah A., Shabayek, Sarah, Hassan, Hayam Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36585632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02690-5
_version_ 1784862261579350016
author Hamed, Sarah A.
Shabayek, Sarah
Hassan, Hayam Y.
author_facet Hamed, Sarah A.
Shabayek, Sarah
Hassan, Hayam Y.
author_sort Hamed, Sarah A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most commonly isolated bacterium from infected root canals. It is found in the form of a biofilm, which makes it more resistant to antimicrobials, and requires optimal chemomechanical strategies to maximize root canal disinfection. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of 4 different endodontic file systems against E. faecalis biofilm growth in root canals using colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). METHODS: Eighty-five extracted human mandibular premolars with straight root canals and apical diameters not larger than the #15 K-file were randomly selected. After performing a pilot study (n = 15) to determine the ideal incubation period for E. faecalis biofilm development, sixty-five root canals were infected with E. faecalis, incubated for 3 weeks, and then mechanically prepared using one of four single files (XP-endo Shaper, Hyflex EDM, One Curve, and Fanta. AFTM F One) (n = 15). Five infected root canals were excluded for the positive control. Five non-contaminated root canals were included for the negative control. Samples were collected using sterile paper points pre- and post-instrumentation to determine the bacterial load (CFU/mL). Root canals from each group were topographically evaluated at the coronal, middle, and apical segments using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Bacterial reduction data were estimated and statistically analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (post hoc test) (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: XP-endo Shaper, Hyflex DEM, and One Curve significantly could eradicate E. faecalis biofilms in infected root canals with no significant difference among them compared to Fanta. AF™ F One. CONCLUSION: None of the systems were capable of completely eliminating biofilms. XP-endo Shaper, Hyflex EDM, and One Curve mechanically eliminated E. faecalis biofilms compared to Fanta. AF™ F One from infected root canals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9805083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98050832023-01-01 Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files Hamed, Sarah A. Shabayek, Sarah Hassan, Hayam Y. BMC Oral Health Research INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is the most commonly isolated bacterium from infected root canals. It is found in the form of a biofilm, which makes it more resistant to antimicrobials, and requires optimal chemomechanical strategies to maximize root canal disinfection. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of 4 different endodontic file systems against E. faecalis biofilm growth in root canals using colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). METHODS: Eighty-five extracted human mandibular premolars with straight root canals and apical diameters not larger than the #15 K-file were randomly selected. After performing a pilot study (n = 15) to determine the ideal incubation period for E. faecalis biofilm development, sixty-five root canals were infected with E. faecalis, incubated for 3 weeks, and then mechanically prepared using one of four single files (XP-endo Shaper, Hyflex EDM, One Curve, and Fanta. AFTM F One) (n = 15). Five infected root canals were excluded for the positive control. Five non-contaminated root canals were included for the negative control. Samples were collected using sterile paper points pre- and post-instrumentation to determine the bacterial load (CFU/mL). Root canals from each group were topographically evaluated at the coronal, middle, and apical segments using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Bacterial reduction data were estimated and statistically analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (post hoc test) (P ≤ .05). RESULTS: XP-endo Shaper, Hyflex DEM, and One Curve significantly could eradicate E. faecalis biofilms in infected root canals with no significant difference among them compared to Fanta. AF™ F One. CONCLUSION: None of the systems were capable of completely eliminating biofilms. XP-endo Shaper, Hyflex EDM, and One Curve mechanically eliminated E. faecalis biofilms compared to Fanta. AF™ F One from infected root canals. BioMed Central 2022-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9805083/ /pubmed/36585632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02690-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hamed, Sarah A.
Shabayek, Sarah
Hassan, Hayam Y.
Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files
title Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files
title_full Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files
title_fullStr Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files
title_full_unstemmed Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files
title_short Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files
title_sort biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36585632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02690-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hamedsaraha biofilmeliminationfrominfectedrootcanalsusingfourdifferentsinglefiles
AT shabayeksarah biofilmeliminationfrominfectedrootcanalsusingfourdifferentsinglefiles
AT hassanhayamy biofilmeliminationfrominfectedrootcanalsusingfourdifferentsinglefiles