Cargando…

Clinical outcomes and associated factors in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis, combining mechanical debridement and prosthesis modification: A 30‐month follow‐up prospective case series

AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcome and the associated factors of a treatment protocol for peri‐implant mucositis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were evaluated 30 months after a treatment protocol including professional mechanical debridement and modification of the prosthesis contours to improv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Tapia, Beatriz, Bonnin, Maria, Valles, Cristina, Mozas, Carla, Herrera, David, Sanz, Mariano, Nart, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36054620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13711
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcome and the associated factors of a treatment protocol for peri‐implant mucositis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were evaluated 30 months after a treatment protocol including professional mechanical debridement and modification of the prosthesis contours to improve access for biofilm control. Clinical performance was assessed by means of probing with an electronic pressure‐calibrated periodontal probe. The possible impact of implant‐ and patient‐level factors on the changes in peri‐implant mucosal inflammation measured with the modified bleeding index (mBI) was evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty patients and 61 implants were included in the analysis. At the final visit, 50% of the patients presented bleeding on probing, with a mean mBI of 0.22 (SD 0.27). The adjusted linear regression model showed a significant association between patient's compliance with supportive care visits (p = .006) and mucosal inflammation. Similarly, at the implant level, modified plaque index (p < .001) and an irregular use of interdental brushes (p = .017) had a significant impact on final mBI. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis modification when needed in association with non‐surgical treatment may be an important intervention in the treatment of peri‐implant mucositis. Compliance with supportive care visits and the regular use of inter‐dental brushes were identified as important factors to achieve mucosal inflammation control.