Cargando…

Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens

This study sought to determine the effects of dietary paraprobiotic (PPB) on broiler chicken performance, immunity, gut health, and carcass traits. A total of 240 day-old CARIBRO Vishal commercial broiler chicks of identical body weight randomly divided into six treatment groups, each with five repl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tukaram, Nampalle Mukesh, Biswas, Avishek, Deo, Chandra, Laxman, Agashe Jayanti, Monika, Madheshwaran, Tiwari, Ashok Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36587047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27181-z
_version_ 1784862334380933120
author Tukaram, Nampalle Mukesh
Biswas, Avishek
Deo, Chandra
Laxman, Agashe Jayanti
Monika, Madheshwaran
Tiwari, Ashok Kumar
author_facet Tukaram, Nampalle Mukesh
Biswas, Avishek
Deo, Chandra
Laxman, Agashe Jayanti
Monika, Madheshwaran
Tiwari, Ashok Kumar
author_sort Tukaram, Nampalle Mukesh
collection PubMed
description This study sought to determine the effects of dietary paraprobiotic (PPB) on broiler chicken performance, immunity, gut health, and carcass traits. A total of 240 day-old CARIBRO Vishal commercial broiler chicks of identical body weight randomly divided into six treatment groups, each with five replicates and eight chicks in each replicate. Six dietary treatments were preapared: T(1) = (control diet), T(2) = T(1) + 0.02% (w/v) chlortetracycline (CTC), T(3) = T(1) + 0.2% (w/v) PPB, T(4) = T(1) + 0.4% (w/v) PPB, T(5) = T(1) + 0.6% (w/v) PPB and T(6) = T(1) + 0.8% (w/v) PPB, respectively. Body weight gain (BWG) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased in the T(5) (0.6% PPB) and T(6) (0.8% PPB) group. At the same time the feed intake significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved in T(5) and T(6) group. There was a significant (P ≤ 0.05) increase in cell-mediated immunity and haem-agglutination titre (HA titre) in the 0.6% and 0.8% PPB supplemented groups compare to the control group (T(1)). The percentage of carcass traits and organ weights did not significantly differ between the PPB-supplemented and control groups, but the percentage of live weight in cut up parts showed a significant improvement (P ≤ 0.05) in the PPB-supplemented group. At 42 days, villus height, width, and crypt depth all significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased in the groups supplemented with 0.6 and 0.8% para-probiotics (T(5) and T(6)). The results show that para-probiotics can be added to broiler diets at a rate of 0.6% (w/v) to enhance performance, immunity, gut health, and breast yield. The para-probiotic may therefore be a useful substitution for antibiotic growth promoters in the diet of chickens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9805422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98054222023-01-02 Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens Tukaram, Nampalle Mukesh Biswas, Avishek Deo, Chandra Laxman, Agashe Jayanti Monika, Madheshwaran Tiwari, Ashok Kumar Sci Rep Article This study sought to determine the effects of dietary paraprobiotic (PPB) on broiler chicken performance, immunity, gut health, and carcass traits. A total of 240 day-old CARIBRO Vishal commercial broiler chicks of identical body weight randomly divided into six treatment groups, each with five replicates and eight chicks in each replicate. Six dietary treatments were preapared: T(1) = (control diet), T(2) = T(1) + 0.02% (w/v) chlortetracycline (CTC), T(3) = T(1) + 0.2% (w/v) PPB, T(4) = T(1) + 0.4% (w/v) PPB, T(5) = T(1) + 0.6% (w/v) PPB and T(6) = T(1) + 0.8% (w/v) PPB, respectively. Body weight gain (BWG) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased in the T(5) (0.6% PPB) and T(6) (0.8% PPB) group. At the same time the feed intake significantly (P ≤ 0.05) decreased and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) significantly (P ≤ 0.05) improved in T(5) and T(6) group. There was a significant (P ≤ 0.05) increase in cell-mediated immunity and haem-agglutination titre (HA titre) in the 0.6% and 0.8% PPB supplemented groups compare to the control group (T(1)). The percentage of carcass traits and organ weights did not significantly differ between the PPB-supplemented and control groups, but the percentage of live weight in cut up parts showed a significant improvement (P ≤ 0.05) in the PPB-supplemented group. At 42 days, villus height, width, and crypt depth all significantly (P ≤ 0.05) increased in the groups supplemented with 0.6 and 0.8% para-probiotics (T(5) and T(6)). The results show that para-probiotics can be added to broiler diets at a rate of 0.6% (w/v) to enhance performance, immunity, gut health, and breast yield. The para-probiotic may therefore be a useful substitution for antibiotic growth promoters in the diet of chickens. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9805422/ /pubmed/36587047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27181-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Tukaram, Nampalle Mukesh
Biswas, Avishek
Deo, Chandra
Laxman, Agashe Jayanti
Monika, Madheshwaran
Tiwari, Ashok Kumar
Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens
title Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens
title_full Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens
title_fullStr Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens
title_full_unstemmed Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens
title_short Effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens
title_sort effects of paraprobiotic as replacements for antibiotic on performance, immunity, gut health and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36587047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27181-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tukaramnampallemukesh effectsofparaprobioticasreplacementsforantibioticonperformanceimmunityguthealthandcarcasscharacteristicsinbroilerchickens
AT biswasavishek effectsofparaprobioticasreplacementsforantibioticonperformanceimmunityguthealthandcarcasscharacteristicsinbroilerchickens
AT deochandra effectsofparaprobioticasreplacementsforantibioticonperformanceimmunityguthealthandcarcasscharacteristicsinbroilerchickens
AT laxmanagashejayanti effectsofparaprobioticasreplacementsforantibioticonperformanceimmunityguthealthandcarcasscharacteristicsinbroilerchickens
AT monikamadheshwaran effectsofparaprobioticasreplacementsforantibioticonperformanceimmunityguthealthandcarcasscharacteristicsinbroilerchickens
AT tiwariashokkumar effectsofparaprobioticasreplacementsforantibioticonperformanceimmunityguthealthandcarcasscharacteristicsinbroilerchickens