Cargando…

Protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod

Colonisation of crustacean zooplankton with ciliate epibionts is widespread in freshwater and marine environments. However, the ecology of such association are little studied as yet. The occurrence of ciliate epibionts on copepods and the preference towards this association with different life stage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Ram, Kumari, Suman, Malika, Anshu, Sharma, A. P., Dahms, Hans-Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36587046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26004-5
_version_ 1784862338973696000
author Kumar, Ram
Kumari, Suman
Malika, Anshu
Sharma, A. P.
Dahms, Hans-Uwe
author_facet Kumar, Ram
Kumari, Suman
Malika, Anshu
Sharma, A. P.
Dahms, Hans-Uwe
author_sort Kumar, Ram
collection PubMed
description Colonisation of crustacean zooplankton with ciliate epibionts is widespread in freshwater and marine environments. However, the ecology of such association are little studied as yet. The occurrence of ciliate epibionts on copepods and the preference towards this association with different life stages of Mesocyclops were studied from winter to spring. Relative susceptibility of zooplankton species was evaluated by analysing the epibiont colonies and zooids and relate this to the surface area of the host. The maximum epibiont infestation per unit body surface area was recorded on copepodites followed by copepod nauplii rather than other zooplankton species, whereas the rotifer Asplanchna was never affected. Influence of climatic factors such as temperature on the colonisation of epibionts on basibionts was found significant. In winter (November to February) samples, copepods were infested by autotrophic epibionts whereas in late spring and early summer (March–April) heterotrophic protists (peritrichian ciliates) were the sole epibionts on copepods. We conducted experiments in the laboratory on prey selection pattern of predators by direct visual and video-graphic observations of various events (encounter, attack, capture, ingestion, prey escape) during predation by infested and uninfested copepodites and adults of Mesocyclops. Postencounter the attack probability was significantly lower in infested than in uninfested copepods. The present paper reports on substrate preference by epibionts and their impacts in food rich and food scarce environments. Furthermore, major environmental interactions were studied with the reproductive phenology of copepods with respect to epibionts and the cause and effect of long term association of epibionts with copepods need to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9805443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98054432023-01-02 Protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod Kumar, Ram Kumari, Suman Malika, Anshu Sharma, A. P. Dahms, Hans-Uwe Sci Rep Article Colonisation of crustacean zooplankton with ciliate epibionts is widespread in freshwater and marine environments. However, the ecology of such association are little studied as yet. The occurrence of ciliate epibionts on copepods and the preference towards this association with different life stages of Mesocyclops were studied from winter to spring. Relative susceptibility of zooplankton species was evaluated by analysing the epibiont colonies and zooids and relate this to the surface area of the host. The maximum epibiont infestation per unit body surface area was recorded on copepodites followed by copepod nauplii rather than other zooplankton species, whereas the rotifer Asplanchna was never affected. Influence of climatic factors such as temperature on the colonisation of epibionts on basibionts was found significant. In winter (November to February) samples, copepods were infested by autotrophic epibionts whereas in late spring and early summer (March–April) heterotrophic protists (peritrichian ciliates) were the sole epibionts on copepods. We conducted experiments in the laboratory on prey selection pattern of predators by direct visual and video-graphic observations of various events (encounter, attack, capture, ingestion, prey escape) during predation by infested and uninfested copepodites and adults of Mesocyclops. Postencounter the attack probability was significantly lower in infested than in uninfested copepods. The present paper reports on substrate preference by epibionts and their impacts in food rich and food scarce environments. Furthermore, major environmental interactions were studied with the reproductive phenology of copepods with respect to epibionts and the cause and effect of long term association of epibionts with copepods need to be addressed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9805443/ /pubmed/36587046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26004-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kumar, Ram
Kumari, Suman
Malika, Anshu
Sharma, A. P.
Dahms, Hans-Uwe
Protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod
title Protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod
title_full Protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod
title_fullStr Protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod
title_full_unstemmed Protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod
title_short Protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod
title_sort protistan epibionts affect prey selectivity patterns and vulnerability to predation in a cyclopoid copepod
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36587046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26004-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarram protistanepibiontsaffectpreyselectivitypatternsandvulnerabilitytopredationinacyclopoidcopepod
AT kumarisuman protistanepibiontsaffectpreyselectivitypatternsandvulnerabilitytopredationinacyclopoidcopepod
AT malikaanshu protistanepibiontsaffectpreyselectivitypatternsandvulnerabilitytopredationinacyclopoidcopepod
AT sharmaap protistanepibiontsaffectpreyselectivitypatternsandvulnerabilitytopredationinacyclopoidcopepod
AT dahmshansuwe protistanepibiontsaffectpreyselectivitypatternsandvulnerabilitytopredationinacyclopoidcopepod