Evaluation of Osteopathic Principles in Cadaveric Specimens Using Radiological Assessment

Background: Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) of the spine requires the physician to first be able to diagnose with palpation of the spinous processes, transverse processes, and facets, test for movement of the anatomy, and evaluate changes in tissue texture at each level. Physicians should then apply these changes to Fryette’s Principles to effectively understand the corresponding somatic dysfunction and provide treatment. Continuing education in osteopathic principles and practices is important throughout an osteopathic physician’s training. Aim: Diagnosis and treatment require an understanding of the complex neuroanatomy and physiology of patients. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of osteopathic physicians. This was done by evaluating the accuracy of diagnosis of somatic dysfunction on a cadaver specimen and verifying via fluoroscopy and blunt dissection. Materials & Methods: Fresh refrigerated cadavers were palpated for lesions in the thoracic spine by residents and attendings, and diagnoses of somatic dysfunction were made. Anterior-posterior X-rays were taken with a C-arm. These levels were then exposed by blunt dissection, and somatic dysfunctions were visualized and recorded. Comparative analyses were conducted to evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis. Results: The accuracy of diagnoses was correct in those who had OMT skills reassessed throughout training and continuing medical education. Osteopathic physicians who routinely kept up with their training were better able to make diagnoses of somatic dysfunction. Conclusion: Continuing osteopathic medical education with an emphasis on the maintenance of palpatory skills is important. Those physicians with the greatest accuracy of somatic dysfunction diagnosis were physicians who routinely underwent reassessment and continuing medical education of osteopathic skills.