Cargando…

Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of GBD 2019

AIMS: Policymakers and researchers have little evidence on prevalence rates of intellectual disability (ID) or their changes over time to tailor healthcare interventions. Prevalence rates and trends of ID are especially lacking in regions with lower socio-demographic development. Additionally, the a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nair, R., Chen, M., Dutt, A. S., Hagopian, L., Singh, A., Du, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796022000701
_version_ 1784862384806952960
author Nair, R.
Chen, M.
Dutt, A. S.
Hagopian, L.
Singh, A.
Du, M.
author_facet Nair, R.
Chen, M.
Dutt, A. S.
Hagopian, L.
Singh, A.
Du, M.
author_sort Nair, R.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Policymakers and researchers have little evidence on prevalence rates of intellectual disability (ID) or their changes over time to tailor healthcare interventions. Prevalence rates and trends of ID are especially lacking in regions with lower socio-demographic development. Additionally, the assessment of inequalities in the prevalence of ID across regions with varying socio-demographic development is understudied. This study assessed variations in prevalence rates of ID from 1990 to 2019 and the related inequalities between low and high socio-demographic index (SDI) regions. METHODS: This study used global data from 1990 to 2019 for individuals with ID from the 2019 Global Burden of Diseases study. Data analyses were performed from September 2021 to January 2022. Prevalence for individuals with ID was extracted by sex, age groups and SDI regions. Annual percentage change (APC) was estimated for each demographic group within SDI regions to assess their prevalence trends over 30 years. Relative and absolute inequalities were calculated between low and high SDI regions for the various age groups. RESULTS: In 2019, there were 107.62 million (1.74%) individuals with ID, with an APC of −0.80 (−0.88 to −0.72). There was a slightly higher prevalence among males (1.42%) than females (1.37%). The highest prevalence rates were found in the low-middle SDI regions (2.42%) and the lowest prevalence rates were in the high SDI regions (0.33%). There was a large reduction in the prevalence rate between the youngest age group v. the oldest age group in all the SDI regions and at all time points. The relative inequalities between low and high SDI regions increased over three decades. CONCLUSIONS: While an overall decrease in global prevalence rate for ID was found, relative inequalities continue to increase with lower SDI regions needing more comprehensive support services. The demographic trends indicate a significantly higher mortality rate among those with ID v. the rest of the population. Our study highlights the necessity for policies and interventions targeting lower SDI regions to mobilise resources that better support individuals with ID and achieve sustainable development goals proposed by the United Nations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9805697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98056972023-01-03 Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of GBD 2019 Nair, R. Chen, M. Dutt, A. S. Hagopian, L. Singh, A. Du, M. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Original Article AIMS: Policymakers and researchers have little evidence on prevalence rates of intellectual disability (ID) or their changes over time to tailor healthcare interventions. Prevalence rates and trends of ID are especially lacking in regions with lower socio-demographic development. Additionally, the assessment of inequalities in the prevalence of ID across regions with varying socio-demographic development is understudied. This study assessed variations in prevalence rates of ID from 1990 to 2019 and the related inequalities between low and high socio-demographic index (SDI) regions. METHODS: This study used global data from 1990 to 2019 for individuals with ID from the 2019 Global Burden of Diseases study. Data analyses were performed from September 2021 to January 2022. Prevalence for individuals with ID was extracted by sex, age groups and SDI regions. Annual percentage change (APC) was estimated for each demographic group within SDI regions to assess their prevalence trends over 30 years. Relative and absolute inequalities were calculated between low and high SDI regions for the various age groups. RESULTS: In 2019, there were 107.62 million (1.74%) individuals with ID, with an APC of −0.80 (−0.88 to −0.72). There was a slightly higher prevalence among males (1.42%) than females (1.37%). The highest prevalence rates were found in the low-middle SDI regions (2.42%) and the lowest prevalence rates were in the high SDI regions (0.33%). There was a large reduction in the prevalence rate between the youngest age group v. the oldest age group in all the SDI regions and at all time points. The relative inequalities between low and high SDI regions increased over three decades. CONCLUSIONS: While an overall decrease in global prevalence rate for ID was found, relative inequalities continue to increase with lower SDI regions needing more comprehensive support services. The demographic trends indicate a significantly higher mortality rate among those with ID v. the rest of the population. Our study highlights the necessity for policies and interventions targeting lower SDI regions to mobilise resources that better support individuals with ID and achieve sustainable development goals proposed by the United Nations. Cambridge University Press 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9805697/ /pubmed/36539341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796022000701 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nair, R.
Chen, M.
Dutt, A. S.
Hagopian, L.
Singh, A.
Du, M.
Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of GBD 2019
title Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of GBD 2019
title_full Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of GBD 2019
title_fullStr Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of GBD 2019
title_full_unstemmed Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of GBD 2019
title_short Significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of GBD 2019
title_sort significant regional inequalities in the prevalence of intellectual disability and trends from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis of gbd 2019
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796022000701
work_keys_str_mv AT nairr significantregionalinequalitiesintheprevalenceofintellectualdisabilityandtrendsfrom1990to2019asystematicanalysisofgbd2019
AT chenm significantregionalinequalitiesintheprevalenceofintellectualdisabilityandtrendsfrom1990to2019asystematicanalysisofgbd2019
AT duttas significantregionalinequalitiesintheprevalenceofintellectualdisabilityandtrendsfrom1990to2019asystematicanalysisofgbd2019
AT hagopianl significantregionalinequalitiesintheprevalenceofintellectualdisabilityandtrendsfrom1990to2019asystematicanalysisofgbd2019
AT singha significantregionalinequalitiesintheprevalenceofintellectualdisabilityandtrendsfrom1990to2019asystematicanalysisofgbd2019
AT dum significantregionalinequalitiesintheprevalenceofintellectualdisabilityandtrendsfrom1990to2019asystematicanalysisofgbd2019