Cargando…

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid (HA) in a bimodal solution (CI+HA) is compared with bilateral HAs (HA+HA) to test if the bimodal solution results in better speech intelligibility and self-reported quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled trial is conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakobsen, Yeliz, Christensen Andersen, Lou-Ann, Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070296
_version_ 1784862459756019712
author Jakobsen, Yeliz
Christensen Andersen, Lou-Ann
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
author_facet Jakobsen, Yeliz
Christensen Andersen, Lou-Ann
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
author_sort Jakobsen, Yeliz
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid (HA) in a bimodal solution (CI+HA) is compared with bilateral HAs (HA+HA) to test if the bimodal solution results in better speech intelligibility and self-reported quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled trial is conducted in Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Sixty adult bilateral HA users referred for CI surgery are enrolled if eligible and undergo: audiometry, speech perception in noise (HINT: Hearing in Noise Test), Speech Identification Scores and video head impulse test. All participants will receive new replacement HAs. After 1 month they will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group (CI+HA) or to the delayed intervention control group (HA+HA). The intervention group (CI+HA) will receive a CI on the ear with a poorer speech recognition score and continue using the HA on the other ear. The control group (HA+HA) will receive a CI after a total of 4 months of bilateral HA use. The primary outcome measures are speech intelligibility measured objectively with HINT (sentences in noise) and DANTALE I (words) and subjectively with the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are patient reported Health-Related Quality of Life scores assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Third outcome is listening effort assessed with pupil dilation during HINT. In conclusion, the purpose is to improve the clinical decision-making for CI candidacy and optimise bimodal solutions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee Southern Denmark project ID S-20200074G. All participants are required to sign an informed consent form. This study will be published on completion in peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04919928.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9806092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98060922023-01-03 Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores Jakobsen, Yeliz Christensen Andersen, Lou-Ann Schmidt, Jesper Hvass BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implant (CI) and hearing aid (HA) in a bimodal solution (CI+HA) is compared with bilateral HAs (HA+HA) to test if the bimodal solution results in better speech intelligibility and self-reported quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled trial is conducted in Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Sixty adult bilateral HA users referred for CI surgery are enrolled if eligible and undergo: audiometry, speech perception in noise (HINT: Hearing in Noise Test), Speech Identification Scores and video head impulse test. All participants will receive new replacement HAs. After 1 month they will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group (CI+HA) or to the delayed intervention control group (HA+HA). The intervention group (CI+HA) will receive a CI on the ear with a poorer speech recognition score and continue using the HA on the other ear. The control group (HA+HA) will receive a CI after a total of 4 months of bilateral HA use. The primary outcome measures are speech intelligibility measured objectively with HINT (sentences in noise) and DANTALE I (words) and subjectively with the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are patient reported Health-Related Quality of Life scores assessed with the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Third outcome is listening effort assessed with pupil dilation during HINT. In conclusion, the purpose is to improve the clinical decision-making for CI candidacy and optimise bimodal solutions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee Southern Denmark project ID S-20200074G. All participants are required to sign an informed consent form. This study will be published on completion in peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04919928. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9806092/ /pubmed/36581413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070296 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
Jakobsen, Yeliz
Christensen Andersen, Lou-Ann
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_full Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_fullStr Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_short Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
title_sort study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the benefits from bimodal solution with cochlear implant and hearing aid versus bilateral hearing aids in patients with asymmetric speech identification scores
topic Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070296
work_keys_str_mv AT jakobsenyeliz studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthebenefitsfrombimodalsolutionwithcochlearimplantandhearingaidversusbilateralhearingaidsinpatientswithasymmetricspeechidentificationscores
AT christensenandersenlouann studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthebenefitsfrombimodalsolutionwithcochlearimplantandhearingaidversusbilateralhearingaidsinpatientswithasymmetricspeechidentificationscores
AT schmidtjesperhvass studyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthebenefitsfrombimodalsolutionwithcochlearimplantandhearingaidversusbilateralhearingaidsinpatientswithasymmetricspeechidentificationscores