Cargando…

Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: This population-based case–control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hashemi, Hassan, Nabovati, Payam, Yekta, Abbasali, Borojerdi, Ali, Fallahkohan, Hamidreza, Rezvan, Farhad, Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620715
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306
_version_ 1784862510105493504
author Hashemi, Hassan
Nabovati, Payam
Yekta, Abbasali
Borojerdi, Ali
Fallahkohan, Hamidreza
Rezvan, Farhad
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
author_facet Hashemi, Hassan
Nabovati, Payam
Yekta, Abbasali
Borojerdi, Ali
Fallahkohan, Hamidreza
Rezvan, Farhad
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
author_sort Hashemi, Hassan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: This population-based case–control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with accidents and were at fault for the accident. The cases were selected in an ongoing manner (incidence cases). The controls were drivers who were the opposing victims in the same. After an initial interview, optometric and ophthalmic examinations including the measurement of visual acuity, refraction, visual field assessment, contrast sensitivity measurement, and slit lamp biomicroscopy were performed for all study participants. RESULTS: In this study, 281 and 204 individuals were selected for the case and control groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.05 [Formula: see text] 0.12 and 0.037 [Formula: see text] 0.10 logMAR in the case and control groups, respectively (P = 0.095). Of the participants in the case and control groups, 32.8% and 23% had a visual field defect in at least one eye, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–2.48; P = 0.021). Moreover, 16.2% of the cases and 8.3% of the controls had visual field defects in both eyes (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17–3.86; P = 0.012). Contrast sensitivity was worse in the case group in all spatial frequencies under non-glare conditions. However, under glare conditions, the contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in the case group only in the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree (cpd). CONCLUSION: Reduced contrast sensitivity, especially under non-glare conditions, and visual field defects are risk factors that influence the prevalence of road accidents. It is strongly advised that special attention be paid to these visual functions in legal assessments to apply the necessary interventions in individuals with these types of disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9806314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98063142023-01-06 Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries Hashemi, Hassan Nabovati, Payam Yekta, Abbasali Borojerdi, Ali Fallahkohan, Hamidreza Rezvan, Farhad Khabazkhoob, Mehdi J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: This population-based case–control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with accidents and were at fault for the accident. The cases were selected in an ongoing manner (incidence cases). The controls were drivers who were the opposing victims in the same. After an initial interview, optometric and ophthalmic examinations including the measurement of visual acuity, refraction, visual field assessment, contrast sensitivity measurement, and slit lamp biomicroscopy were performed for all study participants. RESULTS: In this study, 281 and 204 individuals were selected for the case and control groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.05 [Formula: see text] 0.12 and 0.037 [Formula: see text] 0.10 logMAR in the case and control groups, respectively (P = 0.095). Of the participants in the case and control groups, 32.8% and 23% had a visual field defect in at least one eye, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–2.48; P = 0.021). Moreover, 16.2% of the cases and 8.3% of the controls had visual field defects in both eyes (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17–3.86; P = 0.012). Contrast sensitivity was worse in the case group in all spatial frequencies under non-glare conditions. However, under glare conditions, the contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in the case group only in the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree (cpd). CONCLUSION: Reduced contrast sensitivity, especially under non-glare conditions, and visual field defects are risk factors that influence the prevalence of road accidents. It is strongly advised that special attention be paid to these visual functions in legal assessments to apply the necessary interventions in individuals with these types of disorders. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9806314/ /pubmed/36620715 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hashemi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hashemi, Hassan
Nabovati, Payam
Yekta, Abbasali
Borojerdi, Ali
Fallahkohan, Hamidreza
Rezvan, Farhad
Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries
title Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries
title_full Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries
title_fullStr Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries
title_full_unstemmed Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries
title_short Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries
title_sort abnormal visual function: an under-recognized risk factor of road traffic injuries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620715
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306
work_keys_str_mv AT hashemihassan abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries
AT nabovatipayam abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries
AT yektaabbasali abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries
AT borojerdiali abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries
AT fallahkohanhamidreza abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries
AT rezvanfarhad abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries
AT khabazkhoobmehdi abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries