Cargando…
Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries
PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: This population-based case–control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620715 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306 |
_version_ | 1784862510105493504 |
---|---|
author | Hashemi, Hassan Nabovati, Payam Yekta, Abbasali Borojerdi, Ali Fallahkohan, Hamidreza Rezvan, Farhad Khabazkhoob, Mehdi |
author_facet | Hashemi, Hassan Nabovati, Payam Yekta, Abbasali Borojerdi, Ali Fallahkohan, Hamidreza Rezvan, Farhad Khabazkhoob, Mehdi |
author_sort | Hashemi, Hassan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: This population-based case–control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with accidents and were at fault for the accident. The cases were selected in an ongoing manner (incidence cases). The controls were drivers who were the opposing victims in the same. After an initial interview, optometric and ophthalmic examinations including the measurement of visual acuity, refraction, visual field assessment, contrast sensitivity measurement, and slit lamp biomicroscopy were performed for all study participants. RESULTS: In this study, 281 and 204 individuals were selected for the case and control groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.05 [Formula: see text] 0.12 and 0.037 [Formula: see text] 0.10 logMAR in the case and control groups, respectively (P = 0.095). Of the participants in the case and control groups, 32.8% and 23% had a visual field defect in at least one eye, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–2.48; P = 0.021). Moreover, 16.2% of the cases and 8.3% of the controls had visual field defects in both eyes (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17–3.86; P = 0.012). Contrast sensitivity was worse in the case group in all spatial frequencies under non-glare conditions. However, under glare conditions, the contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in the case group only in the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree (cpd). CONCLUSION: Reduced contrast sensitivity, especially under non-glare conditions, and visual field defects are risk factors that influence the prevalence of road accidents. It is strongly advised that special attention be paid to these visual functions in legal assessments to apply the necessary interventions in individuals with these types of disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9806314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98063142023-01-06 Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries Hashemi, Hassan Nabovati, Payam Yekta, Abbasali Borojerdi, Ali Fallahkohan, Hamidreza Rezvan, Farhad Khabazkhoob, Mehdi J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: This population-based case–control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with accidents and were at fault for the accident. The cases were selected in an ongoing manner (incidence cases). The controls were drivers who were the opposing victims in the same. After an initial interview, optometric and ophthalmic examinations including the measurement of visual acuity, refraction, visual field assessment, contrast sensitivity measurement, and slit lamp biomicroscopy were performed for all study participants. RESULTS: In this study, 281 and 204 individuals were selected for the case and control groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.05 [Formula: see text] 0.12 and 0.037 [Formula: see text] 0.10 logMAR in the case and control groups, respectively (P = 0.095). Of the participants in the case and control groups, 32.8% and 23% had a visual field defect in at least one eye, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–2.48; P = 0.021). Moreover, 16.2% of the cases and 8.3% of the controls had visual field defects in both eyes (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17–3.86; P = 0.012). Contrast sensitivity was worse in the case group in all spatial frequencies under non-glare conditions. However, under glare conditions, the contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in the case group only in the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree (cpd). CONCLUSION: Reduced contrast sensitivity, especially under non-glare conditions, and visual field defects are risk factors that influence the prevalence of road accidents. It is strongly advised that special attention be paid to these visual functions in legal assessments to apply the necessary interventions in individuals with these types of disorders. PUBLISHED BY KNOWLEDGE E 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9806314/ /pubmed/36620715 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hashemi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hashemi, Hassan Nabovati, Payam Yekta, Abbasali Borojerdi, Ali Fallahkohan, Hamidreza Rezvan, Farhad Khabazkhoob, Mehdi Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries |
title | Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries |
title_full | Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries |
title_fullStr | Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries |
title_full_unstemmed | Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries |
title_short | Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries |
title_sort | abnormal visual function: an under-recognized risk factor of road traffic injuries |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36620715 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hashemihassan abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries AT nabovatipayam abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries AT yektaabbasali abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries AT borojerdiali abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries AT fallahkohanhamidreza abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries AT rezvanfarhad abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries AT khabazkhoobmehdi abnormalvisualfunctionanunderrecognizedriskfactorofroadtrafficinjuries |