Can’t keep it SECRET: system evaluation of carbapenem restriction against empirical therapy

OBJECTIVES: Carbapenems are appealing agents for empirical use given their broad spectrum of activity; however, selective use is vital in minimizing the risk for development of carbapenem-resistant pathogens. We aimed to examine the impact of carbapenem restriction criteria and a pre-authorization process on utilization and cost savings across a health system. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted across five adult hospitals. The pre-implementation period was 8 February 2020 to 30 April 2020 and the post-implementation period was 8 February 2022 to 30 April 2022. The primary outcome was to compare the number of orders for carbapenems between the study periods for both the intervention and non-intervention hospitals. Secondary outcomes included projected annual cost and an estimated cost-savings evaluation using a stratified analysis for the intervention and non-intervention facilities to account for more resource-limited settings. RESULTS: The total number of carbapenem orders decreased between study periods at the intervention hospital (246 versus 61, P < 0.01). At the non-intervention hospitals, orders decreased, although not significantly (333 versus 279, P = 0.58). Meropenem orders decreased by 66% compared with 12% for the intervention and the non-intervention hospitals, respectively (P < 0.001). Annual estimated cost for all facilities was $255 561 in the pre-implementation period compared with $29 593 in the post-implementation period (P < 0.001). Using a stratified analysis to account for available resources, the estimated annual cost saving was $225 968 for the system. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of carbapenem restriction at the intervention hospital decreased utilization and provided significant cost savings. Furthermore, resource-limited facilities can still experience significant cost savings using a stratified antimicrobial stewardship intervention approach.