Cargando…
Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer
BACKGROUND: Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the survival of patients with advanced disease remains poor. A better understanding of where treatment fails could aid the development of new treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease course after pelvic lymph node (LN) treatment for PeCa....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.005 |
_version_ | 1784862577786880000 |
---|---|
author | de Vries, Hielke M. Ottenhof, Sarah R. Rafael, Tynisha S. van Werkhoven, Erik Pos, Floris J. van Rhijn, Bas W.G. Moonen, Luc M.F. Graafland, Niels de Feijter, Jeantine M. Schaake, Eva E. Horenblas, Simon Brouwer, Oscar R. |
author_facet | de Vries, Hielke M. Ottenhof, Sarah R. Rafael, Tynisha S. van Werkhoven, Erik Pos, Floris J. van Rhijn, Bas W.G. Moonen, Luc M.F. Graafland, Niels de Feijter, Jeantine M. Schaake, Eva E. Horenblas, Simon Brouwer, Oscar R. |
author_sort | de Vries, Hielke M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the survival of patients with advanced disease remains poor. A better understanding of where treatment fails could aid the development of new treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease course after pelvic lymph node (LN) treatment for PeCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively analysed 228 patients who underwent pelvic LN treatment with curative intent from 1969 to 2016. The main treatment modalities were neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and pelvic LN dissection. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In the case of multiple recurrence locations, the most distant location was taken and recorded as follows: local (penis), regional (inguinal and pelvic LN), and distant (any other location). A competing risk analysis was used to calculate the time to recurrence per location, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 79 mo. The reason for pelvic treatment was pelvic involvement on imaging (29%), two or more tumour-positive inguinal LNs (61%), or inguinal extranodal extension (52%). More than half of the patients (61%) developed a recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival was 11 mo. The distribution was local in 9%, regional in 27%, and distant in 64% of patients. The infield control rate of nonsystemically treated patients was 61% (113/184). From the start of pelvic treatment, the median OS was 17 mo (95% confidence interval 12–22). After regional or distant recurrence, all but one patient died of PeCa with median OS after a recurrence of 4.4 (regional) and 3.1 (distant) mo. This study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of PeCa patients treated on their pelvis who recur despite locoregional treatment is poor. The tendency for systemic spread emphasises the need for more effective systemic treatment strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of penile cancer patients in an expert centre undergoing various treatments on their pelvis. We found that survival is poor after recurrence despite locoregional treatment. Therefore, better systemic treatments are necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9806705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98067052023-01-03 Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer de Vries, Hielke M. Ottenhof, Sarah R. Rafael, Tynisha S. van Werkhoven, Erik Pos, Floris J. van Rhijn, Bas W.G. Moonen, Luc M.F. Graafland, Niels de Feijter, Jeantine M. Schaake, Eva E. Horenblas, Simon Brouwer, Oscar R. Eur Urol Open Sci Penile Cancer BACKGROUND: Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the survival of patients with advanced disease remains poor. A better understanding of where treatment fails could aid the development of new treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease course after pelvic lymph node (LN) treatment for PeCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively analysed 228 patients who underwent pelvic LN treatment with curative intent from 1969 to 2016. The main treatment modalities were neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and pelvic LN dissection. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In the case of multiple recurrence locations, the most distant location was taken and recorded as follows: local (penis), regional (inguinal and pelvic LN), and distant (any other location). A competing risk analysis was used to calculate the time to recurrence per location, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 79 mo. The reason for pelvic treatment was pelvic involvement on imaging (29%), two or more tumour-positive inguinal LNs (61%), or inguinal extranodal extension (52%). More than half of the patients (61%) developed a recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival was 11 mo. The distribution was local in 9%, regional in 27%, and distant in 64% of patients. The infield control rate of nonsystemically treated patients was 61% (113/184). From the start of pelvic treatment, the median OS was 17 mo (95% confidence interval 12–22). After regional or distant recurrence, all but one patient died of PeCa with median OS after a recurrence of 4.4 (regional) and 3.1 (distant) mo. This study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of PeCa patients treated on their pelvis who recur despite locoregional treatment is poor. The tendency for systemic spread emphasises the need for more effective systemic treatment strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of penile cancer patients in an expert centre undergoing various treatments on their pelvis. We found that survival is poor after recurrence despite locoregional treatment. Therefore, better systemic treatments are necessary. Elsevier 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9806705/ /pubmed/36601037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.005 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Penile Cancer de Vries, Hielke M. Ottenhof, Sarah R. Rafael, Tynisha S. van Werkhoven, Erik Pos, Floris J. van Rhijn, Bas W.G. Moonen, Luc M.F. Graafland, Niels de Feijter, Jeantine M. Schaake, Eva E. Horenblas, Simon Brouwer, Oscar R. Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer |
title | Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer |
title_full | Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer |
title_fullStr | Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer |
title_short | Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer |
title_sort | patterns of recurrence and survival after pelvic treatment for locally advanced penile cancer |
topic | Penile Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devrieshielkem patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT ottenhofsarahr patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT rafaeltynishas patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT vanwerkhovenerik patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT posflorisj patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT vanrhijnbaswg patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT moonenlucmf patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT graaflandniels patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT defeijterjeantinem patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT schaakeevae patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT horenblassimon patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer AT brouweroscarr patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer |