Cargando…

Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer

BACKGROUND: Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the survival of patients with advanced disease remains poor. A better understanding of where treatment fails could aid the development of new treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease course after pelvic lymph node (LN) treatment for PeCa....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Vries, Hielke M., Ottenhof, Sarah R., Rafael, Tynisha S., van Werkhoven, Erik, Pos, Floris J., van Rhijn, Bas W.G., Moonen, Luc M.F., Graafland, Niels, de Feijter, Jeantine M., Schaake, Eva E., Horenblas, Simon, Brouwer, Oscar R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.005
_version_ 1784862577786880000
author de Vries, Hielke M.
Ottenhof, Sarah R.
Rafael, Tynisha S.
van Werkhoven, Erik
Pos, Floris J.
van Rhijn, Bas W.G.
Moonen, Luc M.F.
Graafland, Niels
de Feijter, Jeantine M.
Schaake, Eva E.
Horenblas, Simon
Brouwer, Oscar R.
author_facet de Vries, Hielke M.
Ottenhof, Sarah R.
Rafael, Tynisha S.
van Werkhoven, Erik
Pos, Floris J.
van Rhijn, Bas W.G.
Moonen, Luc M.F.
Graafland, Niels
de Feijter, Jeantine M.
Schaake, Eva E.
Horenblas, Simon
Brouwer, Oscar R.
author_sort de Vries, Hielke M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the survival of patients with advanced disease remains poor. A better understanding of where treatment fails could aid the development of new treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease course after pelvic lymph node (LN) treatment for PeCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively analysed 228 patients who underwent pelvic LN treatment with curative intent from 1969 to 2016. The main treatment modalities were neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and pelvic LN dissection. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In the case of multiple recurrence locations, the most distant location was taken and recorded as follows: local (penis), regional (inguinal and pelvic LN), and distant (any other location). A competing risk analysis was used to calculate the time to recurrence per location, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 79 mo. The reason for pelvic treatment was pelvic involvement on imaging (29%), two or more tumour-positive inguinal LNs (61%), or inguinal extranodal extension (52%). More than half of the patients (61%) developed a recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival was 11 mo. The distribution was local in 9%, regional in 27%, and distant in 64% of patients. The infield control rate of nonsystemically treated patients was 61% (113/184). From the start of pelvic treatment, the median OS was 17 mo (95% confidence interval 12–22). After regional or distant recurrence, all but one patient died of PeCa with median OS after a recurrence of 4.4 (regional) and 3.1 (distant) mo. This study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of PeCa patients treated on their pelvis who recur despite locoregional treatment is poor. The tendency for systemic spread emphasises the need for more effective systemic treatment strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of penile cancer patients in an expert centre undergoing various treatments on their pelvis. We found that survival is poor after recurrence despite locoregional treatment. Therefore, better systemic treatments are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9806705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98067052023-01-03 Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer de Vries, Hielke M. Ottenhof, Sarah R. Rafael, Tynisha S. van Werkhoven, Erik Pos, Floris J. van Rhijn, Bas W.G. Moonen, Luc M.F. Graafland, Niels de Feijter, Jeantine M. Schaake, Eva E. Horenblas, Simon Brouwer, Oscar R. Eur Urol Open Sci Penile Cancer BACKGROUND: Penile cancer (PeCa) is rare, and the survival of patients with advanced disease remains poor. A better understanding of where treatment fails could aid the development of new treatment strategies. OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease course after pelvic lymph node (LN) treatment for PeCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively analysed 228 patients who underwent pelvic LN treatment with curative intent from 1969 to 2016. The main treatment modalities were neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and pelvic LN dissection. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In the case of multiple recurrence locations, the most distant location was taken and recorded as follows: local (penis), regional (inguinal and pelvic LN), and distant (any other location). A competing risk analysis was used to calculate the time to recurrence per location, and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for overall survival (OS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 79 mo. The reason for pelvic treatment was pelvic involvement on imaging (29%), two or more tumour-positive inguinal LNs (61%), or inguinal extranodal extension (52%). More than half of the patients (61%) developed a recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival was 11 mo. The distribution was local in 9%, regional in 27%, and distant in 64% of patients. The infield control rate of nonsystemically treated patients was 61% (113/184). From the start of pelvic treatment, the median OS was 17 mo (95% confidence interval 12–22). After regional or distant recurrence, all but one patient died of PeCa with median OS after a recurrence of 4.4 (regional) and 3.1 (distant) mo. This study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of PeCa patients treated on their pelvis who recur despite locoregional treatment is poor. The tendency for systemic spread emphasises the need for more effective systemic treatment strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of penile cancer patients in an expert centre undergoing various treatments on their pelvis. We found that survival is poor after recurrence despite locoregional treatment. Therefore, better systemic treatments are necessary. Elsevier 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9806705/ /pubmed/36601037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.005 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Penile Cancer
de Vries, Hielke M.
Ottenhof, Sarah R.
Rafael, Tynisha S.
van Werkhoven, Erik
Pos, Floris J.
van Rhijn, Bas W.G.
Moonen, Luc M.F.
Graafland, Niels
de Feijter, Jeantine M.
Schaake, Eva E.
Horenblas, Simon
Brouwer, Oscar R.
Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer
title Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer
title_full Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer
title_fullStr Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer
title_short Patterns of Recurrence and Survival After Pelvic Treatment for Locally Advanced Penile Cancer
title_sort patterns of recurrence and survival after pelvic treatment for locally advanced penile cancer
topic Penile Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.005
work_keys_str_mv AT devrieshielkem patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT ottenhofsarahr patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT rafaeltynishas patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT vanwerkhovenerik patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT posflorisj patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT vanrhijnbaswg patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT moonenlucmf patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT graaflandniels patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT defeijterjeantinem patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT schaakeevae patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT horenblassimon patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer
AT brouweroscarr patternsofrecurrenceandsurvivalafterpelvictreatmentforlocallyadvancedpenilecancer