Cargando…

A comparison of running and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition

The purpose of the present study was to characterize and compare locomotor and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition during matches, and specifically during peak match-play phases using short rolling epochs and continuous ball-in-play (BIP) sequences. 20 international ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peeters, Alexis, Piscione, Julien, Lacome, Mathieu, Carling, Christopher, Babault, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636198
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.112086
_version_ 1784862584399200256
author Peeters, Alexis
Piscione, Julien
Lacome, Mathieu
Carling, Christopher
Babault, Nicolas
author_facet Peeters, Alexis
Piscione, Julien
Lacome, Mathieu
Carling, Christopher
Babault, Nicolas
author_sort Peeters, Alexis
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the present study was to characterize and compare locomotor and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition during matches, and specifically during peak match-play phases using short rolling epochs and continuous ball-in-play (BIP) sequences. 20 international matches from French national teams were analysed in the U18 and U20 Six Nations Tournament respectively and World Rugby U20 Championship. Running loads were quantified using global positioning devices (16 Hz) and contact loads via video match analysis software. Players were split into forward (U18, n = 29; U20, n = 32) and back positional groups (U18, n = 20; U20, n = 24). Compared with U20 peers, U18 players covered a higher total distance (effect size (ES) = -0.76 ± 0.25) and at high-speeds per minute (> 4 m · s(-1); ES = -0.55 ± 0.25) and performed more accelerations (ES = -0.71 ± 0.25). While a greater frequency of BIP sequences > 90 s duration was observed in U20s versus U18s match-play, U18s covered more total distance and high-speed distance (ES = -0.42 ± 0.13 and -0.33 ± 0.13 respectively) per minute during these longer sequences. During peak rolling phases shorter than 4 minutes, no clear differences existed between age categories in running activity, while U20 forwards performed more contact actions than U18 peers. The match-play loads observed in the present international U18 players suggest that they are ready to respond to the overall and peak demands observed in U20 competition. Moreover, the present information on peak activity phases can aid design of overload high-intensity conditioning sessions to respond to the running- and contact-demands identified in those competitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9806746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98067462023-01-11 A comparison of running and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition Peeters, Alexis Piscione, Julien Lacome, Mathieu Carling, Christopher Babault, Nicolas Biol Sport Original Paper The purpose of the present study was to characterize and compare locomotor and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition during matches, and specifically during peak match-play phases using short rolling epochs and continuous ball-in-play (BIP) sequences. 20 international matches from French national teams were analysed in the U18 and U20 Six Nations Tournament respectively and World Rugby U20 Championship. Running loads were quantified using global positioning devices (16 Hz) and contact loads via video match analysis software. Players were split into forward (U18, n = 29; U20, n = 32) and back positional groups (U18, n = 20; U20, n = 24). Compared with U20 peers, U18 players covered a higher total distance (effect size (ES) = -0.76 ± 0.25) and at high-speeds per minute (> 4 m · s(-1); ES = -0.55 ± 0.25) and performed more accelerations (ES = -0.71 ± 0.25). While a greater frequency of BIP sequences > 90 s duration was observed in U20s versus U18s match-play, U18s covered more total distance and high-speed distance (ES = -0.42 ± 0.13 and -0.33 ± 0.13 respectively) per minute during these longer sequences. During peak rolling phases shorter than 4 minutes, no clear differences existed between age categories in running activity, while U20 forwards performed more contact actions than U18 peers. The match-play loads observed in the present international U18 players suggest that they are ready to respond to the overall and peak demands observed in U20 competition. Moreover, the present information on peak activity phases can aid design of overload high-intensity conditioning sessions to respond to the running- and contact-demands identified in those competitions. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022-01-21 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9806746/ /pubmed/36636198 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.112086 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Peeters, Alexis
Piscione, Julien
Lacome, Mathieu
Carling, Christopher
Babault, Nicolas
A comparison of running and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition
title A comparison of running and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition
title_full A comparison of running and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition
title_fullStr A comparison of running and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of running and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition
title_short A comparison of running and contact loads in U18 and U20 international rugby union competition
title_sort comparison of running and contact loads in u18 and u20 international rugby union competition
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636198
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.112086
work_keys_str_mv AT peetersalexis acomparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT piscionejulien acomparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT lacomemathieu acomparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT carlingchristopher acomparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT babaultnicolas acomparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT peetersalexis comparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT piscionejulien comparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT lacomemathieu comparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT carlingchristopher comparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition
AT babaultnicolas comparisonofrunningandcontactloadsinu18andu20internationalrugbyunioncompetition