Cargando…

Acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises

The aim was to compare the acute effects of bench press (BP) and squat (SQ) exercises with blood flow restriction (BFR) (40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the complete arterial occlusion pressure (AOP)) and without BFR (CON) on the mean propulsive (Vel(MED)) and maximum (Vel(MAX)) bar velocity. Fourteen hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serrano-Ramon, Josep M., Cortell-Tormo, Juan M., Bautista, Iker, García-Jaén, Miguel, Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636189
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.112093
_version_ 1784862585479233536
author Serrano-Ramon, Josep M.
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Bautista, Iker
García-Jaén, Miguel
Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
author_facet Serrano-Ramon, Josep M.
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Bautista, Iker
García-Jaén, Miguel
Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
author_sort Serrano-Ramon, Josep M.
collection PubMed
description The aim was to compare the acute effects of bench press (BP) and squat (SQ) exercises with blood flow restriction (BFR) (40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the complete arterial occlusion pressure (AOP)) and without BFR (CON) on the mean propulsive (Vel(MED)) and maximum (Vel(MAX)) bar velocity. Fourteen healthy, physically active males (age, 23.6 ± 4.1 years; height, 1.85 ± 0.11 m; body weight 85.4 ± 4.1 kg) took part in the study. There was one set for each testing condition (CON, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100%) with 6 repetitions for BP and 6 repetitions for SQ, at 60% of 1RM, and 3 minutes of recovery between sets. The results showed statistically significant differences of the sets with 80% BFR vs. CON (mean difference [MD] = 0.035 m · s(-1), p < 0.05, ES = 0.52 [1.02–0.03]) and 100% BFR sets vs. CON (MD = 0.074, p < 0.001, ES = 1.08 [1.79–0.38]) for BP. In the SQ exercise, statistically significant differences were found between 100% BFR vs. CON (DM = 0.031 m · s(-1), p < 0.05), vs. 100% BFR 40% (MD = 0.04 m · s(-1), p < 0.05). Trend analysis showed a statistically significant linear trend (F[1,9] = 34.9, p < 0.001, F[1,13] = 27.32, p < 0.001) for the Vel(MED) in relation to the different levels of BFR. In conclusion, our results showed that BFR levels above ˜80% AOP (BP) and ˜100% AOP (SQ) produce a Vel(MED) improvement at 60% 1RM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9806750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Institute of Sport in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98067502023-01-11 Acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises Serrano-Ramon, Josep M. Cortell-Tormo, Juan M. Bautista, Iker García-Jaén, Miguel Chulvi-Medrano, Iván Biol Sport Original Paper The aim was to compare the acute effects of bench press (BP) and squat (SQ) exercises with blood flow restriction (BFR) (40%, 60%, 80% and 100% of the complete arterial occlusion pressure (AOP)) and without BFR (CON) on the mean propulsive (Vel(MED)) and maximum (Vel(MAX)) bar velocity. Fourteen healthy, physically active males (age, 23.6 ± 4.1 years; height, 1.85 ± 0.11 m; body weight 85.4 ± 4.1 kg) took part in the study. There was one set for each testing condition (CON, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100%) with 6 repetitions for BP and 6 repetitions for SQ, at 60% of 1RM, and 3 minutes of recovery between sets. The results showed statistically significant differences of the sets with 80% BFR vs. CON (mean difference [MD] = 0.035 m · s(-1), p < 0.05, ES = 0.52 [1.02–0.03]) and 100% BFR sets vs. CON (MD = 0.074, p < 0.001, ES = 1.08 [1.79–0.38]) for BP. In the SQ exercise, statistically significant differences were found between 100% BFR vs. CON (DM = 0.031 m · s(-1), p < 0.05), vs. 100% BFR 40% (MD = 0.04 m · s(-1), p < 0.05). Trend analysis showed a statistically significant linear trend (F[1,9] = 34.9, p < 0.001, F[1,13] = 27.32, p < 0.001) for the Vel(MED) in relation to the different levels of BFR. In conclusion, our results showed that BFR levels above ˜80% AOP (BP) and ˜100% AOP (SQ) produce a Vel(MED) improvement at 60% 1RM. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022-03-16 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9806750/ /pubmed/36636189 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.112093 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Serrano-Ramon, Josep M.
Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
Bautista, Iker
García-Jaén, Miguel
Chulvi-Medrano, Iván
Acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises
title Acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises
title_full Acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises
title_fullStr Acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises
title_full_unstemmed Acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises
title_short Acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises
title_sort acute effects of different external compression with blood flow restriction on force-velocity profile during squat and bench press exercises
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636189
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.112093
work_keys_str_mv AT serranoramonjosepm acuteeffectsofdifferentexternalcompressionwithbloodflowrestrictiononforcevelocityprofileduringsquatandbenchpressexercises
AT cortelltormojuanm acuteeffectsofdifferentexternalcompressionwithbloodflowrestrictiononforcevelocityprofileduringsquatandbenchpressexercises
AT bautistaiker acuteeffectsofdifferentexternalcompressionwithbloodflowrestrictiononforcevelocityprofileduringsquatandbenchpressexercises
AT garciajaenmiguel acuteeffectsofdifferentexternalcompressionwithbloodflowrestrictiononforcevelocityprofileduringsquatandbenchpressexercises
AT chulvimedranoivan acuteeffectsofdifferentexternalcompressionwithbloodflowrestrictiononforcevelocityprofileduringsquatandbenchpressexercises