Cargando…
Effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effects of climbing and climbing-and-resistance-training on climbing performance, and strength and endurance tests. We systematically searched three databases (SPORTDiscus, SCOPUS, and PubMed) for records published until Ja...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Institute of Sport in Warsaw
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636194 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.113295 |
_version_ | 1784862585725648896 |
---|---|
author | Stien, Nicolay Riiser, Amund Shaw, Matthew P. Saeterbakken, Atle H. Andersen, Vidar |
author_facet | Stien, Nicolay Riiser, Amund Shaw, Matthew P. Saeterbakken, Atle H. Andersen, Vidar |
author_sort | Stien, Nicolay |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effects of climbing and climbing-and-resistance-training on climbing performance, and strength and endurance tests. We systematically searched three databases (SPORTDiscus, SCOPUS, and PubMed) for records published until January 2021. The search was limited to randomized-controlled trials using active climbers and measuring climbing performance or performance in climbing-specific tests. Data from the meta-analysis are presented as standardized difference in mean (SDM) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Eleven studies are included in the systematic review and five studies compared training to a control group and could be meta-analyzed. The overall meta-analysis displayed an improvement in climbing-related test performance following climbing-specific resistance training compared to only climbing (SDM = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.24–0.91). Further analyses revealed that finger strength (SDM = 0.41, 95%CI 0.03–0.80), rate of force development (SDM = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.21–1.61), and forearm endurance (SDM = 1.23, 95%CI = 0.69–1.77) were improved by resistance-training of the finger flexors compared to climbing training. The systematic review showed that climbing performance may be improved by specific resistance-training or interval-style bouldering. However, resistance-training of the finger flexors showed no improvements in strength or endurance in climbing-specific tests. The available evidence suggests that resistance-training may be more effective than just climbing-training for improving performance outcomes. Importantly, interventional studies including climbers is limited and more research is needed to confirm these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9806751 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Institute of Sport in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98067512023-01-11 Effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis Stien, Nicolay Riiser, Amund Shaw, Matthew P. Saeterbakken, Atle H. Andersen, Vidar Biol Sport Original Paper The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effects of climbing and climbing-and-resistance-training on climbing performance, and strength and endurance tests. We systematically searched three databases (SPORTDiscus, SCOPUS, and PubMed) for records published until January 2021. The search was limited to randomized-controlled trials using active climbers and measuring climbing performance or performance in climbing-specific tests. Data from the meta-analysis are presented as standardized difference in mean (SDM) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Eleven studies are included in the systematic review and five studies compared training to a control group and could be meta-analyzed. The overall meta-analysis displayed an improvement in climbing-related test performance following climbing-specific resistance training compared to only climbing (SDM = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.24–0.91). Further analyses revealed that finger strength (SDM = 0.41, 95%CI 0.03–0.80), rate of force development (SDM = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.21–1.61), and forearm endurance (SDM = 1.23, 95%CI = 0.69–1.77) were improved by resistance-training of the finger flexors compared to climbing training. The systematic review showed that climbing performance may be improved by specific resistance-training or interval-style bouldering. However, resistance-training of the finger flexors showed no improvements in strength or endurance in climbing-specific tests. The available evidence suggests that resistance-training may be more effective than just climbing-training for improving performance outcomes. Importantly, interventional studies including climbers is limited and more research is needed to confirm these findings. Institute of Sport in Warsaw 2022-02-18 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9806751/ /pubmed/36636194 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.113295 Text en Copyright © Biology of Sport 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Stien, Nicolay Riiser, Amund Shaw, Matthew P. Saeterbakken, Atle H. Andersen, Vidar Effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effects of climbing- and resistance-training on climbing-specific performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636194 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.113295 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stiennicolay effectsofclimbingandresistancetrainingonclimbingspecificperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT riiseramund effectsofclimbingandresistancetrainingonclimbingspecificperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shawmatthewp effectsofclimbingandresistancetrainingonclimbingspecificperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT saeterbakkenatleh effectsofclimbingandresistancetrainingonclimbingspecificperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT andersenvidar effectsofclimbingandresistancetrainingonclimbingspecificperformanceasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |