Burden of firearm-related injuries as associated secondary diagnosis in the United States from National Inpatient Sample Dataset

There is little known about the differences, from the point of view of healthcare resource utilization, between non-fatal versus fatal firearm-related injuries. We undertook this research project utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to address this critical knowledge gap. Our aims for this study were to describe the patterns of FRI in the United States during the period of 2016–2019 and to evaluate the patient-centered outcomes in the survivor (non-fatal injuries) versus the non-survivor (fatal injuries) groups. We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database, 2016–2019 (5) (~ 20% of United States hospitalizations) to identify patients with an associated diagnosis of firearm-related injuries (FRI) [Gibson T et al (2016) in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2016–02]. We found that the individuals from the lowest quartile of annual household income, males, young Americans, and racial minorities were disproportionally affected The non-survivor (fatal injuries) group had a shorter length of stay in the hospital by 5.1 days (95% CI − 5.64 to − 4.58, p value = < 0.01), the higher median cost of hospitalization by $8903 (95% confidence interval $311.9 to $17,494.2, p value = 0.04), and a higher median cost of hospitalization per day by $41,576.74 (95% confidence interval $ 40,333.1 to $42,820.3, p value = < 0.01). In conclusion, the individuals from the lowest quartile of annual household income, males, young Americans and racial minorities were disproportionally affected. Firearm-related injuries pose a persistent healthcare cost burden with the cumulative and per day cost of hospitalization for fatal injuries being significantly higher than the non-fatal injuries despite a shorter hospital LOS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11739-022-03190-8.