Cargando…

Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions

We have previously shown that focused ultrasound (FUS) pulses in low pressure range exerted bidirectional and brain state-dependent neuromodulation in the nonhuman primate somatosensory cortices by fMRI. Here we aim to gain insights about the proposed neuron selective modulation of FUS and probe fee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Pai-Feng, Phipps, M. Anthony, Newton, Allen T., Jonathan, Sumeeth, Manuel, Thomas J., Gore, John C., Grissom, William A., Caskey, Charles F., Chen, Li Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.12.003
_version_ 1784862604767789056
author Yang, Pai-Feng
Phipps, M. Anthony
Newton, Allen T.
Jonathan, Sumeeth
Manuel, Thomas J.
Gore, John C.
Grissom, William A.
Caskey, Charles F.
Chen, Li Min
author_facet Yang, Pai-Feng
Phipps, M. Anthony
Newton, Allen T.
Jonathan, Sumeeth
Manuel, Thomas J.
Gore, John C.
Grissom, William A.
Caskey, Charles F.
Chen, Li Min
author_sort Yang, Pai-Feng
collection PubMed
description We have previously shown that focused ultrasound (FUS) pulses in low pressure range exerted bidirectional and brain state-dependent neuromodulation in the nonhuman primate somatosensory cortices by fMRI. Here we aim to gain insights about the proposed neuron selective modulation of FUS and probe feedforward versus feedback interactions by simultaneously quantifying the stimulus (FUS pressures: 925, 425, 250 kPa) and response (% BOLD fMRI changes) function at the targeted area 3a/3b and off-target cortical areas at 7T. In resting-state, lowered intensities of FUS resulted in decreased fMRI signal changes at the target area 3a/3b and off-target area 1/2, S2, MCC, insula and auditory cortex, and no signal difference in thalamic VPL and MD nuclei. In activated states, concurrent high-intensity FUS significantly enhanced touch-evoked signals in area 1/2. Medium- and low-intensity FUS significantly suppressed touch-evoked BOLD signals in all areas except in the auditory cortex, VPL and MD thalamic nuclei. Distinct state dependent and dose-response curves led us to hypothesize that FUS’s neuromodulatory effects may be mediated through preferential activation of different populations of neurons. Area 3a/3b may have distinct causal feedforward and feedback interactions with Area 1/2, S2, MCC, insula, and VPL. FUS offers a noninvasive neural stimulation tool for dissecting brain circuits and probing causal functional connections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9806861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98068612023-01-02 Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions Yang, Pai-Feng Phipps, M. Anthony Newton, Allen T. Jonathan, Sumeeth Manuel, Thomas J. Gore, John C. Grissom, William A. Caskey, Charles F. Chen, Li Min Brain Stimul Article We have previously shown that focused ultrasound (FUS) pulses in low pressure range exerted bidirectional and brain state-dependent neuromodulation in the nonhuman primate somatosensory cortices by fMRI. Here we aim to gain insights about the proposed neuron selective modulation of FUS and probe feedforward versus feedback interactions by simultaneously quantifying the stimulus (FUS pressures: 925, 425, 250 kPa) and response (% BOLD fMRI changes) function at the targeted area 3a/3b and off-target cortical areas at 7T. In resting-state, lowered intensities of FUS resulted in decreased fMRI signal changes at the target area 3a/3b and off-target area 1/2, S2, MCC, insula and auditory cortex, and no signal difference in thalamic VPL and MD nuclei. In activated states, concurrent high-intensity FUS significantly enhanced touch-evoked signals in area 1/2. Medium- and low-intensity FUS significantly suppressed touch-evoked BOLD signals in all areas except in the auditory cortex, VPL and MD thalamic nuclei. Distinct state dependent and dose-response curves led us to hypothesize that FUS’s neuromodulatory effects may be mediated through preferential activation of different populations of neurons. Area 3a/3b may have distinct causal feedforward and feedback interactions with Area 1/2, S2, MCC, insula, and VPL. FUS offers a noninvasive neural stimulation tool for dissecting brain circuits and probing causal functional connections. 2022 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9806861/ /pubmed/36496128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.12.003 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Yang, Pai-Feng
Phipps, M. Anthony
Newton, Allen T.
Jonathan, Sumeeth
Manuel, Thomas J.
Gore, John C.
Grissom, William A.
Caskey, Charles F.
Chen, Li Min
Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions
title Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions
title_full Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions
title_fullStr Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions
title_full_unstemmed Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions
title_short Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions
title_sort differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT yangpaifeng differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions
AT phippsmanthony differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions
AT newtonallent differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions
AT jonathansumeeth differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions
AT manuelthomasj differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions
AT gorejohnc differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions
AT grissomwilliama differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions
AT caskeycharlesf differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions
AT chenlimin differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions