Cargando…
Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions
We have previously shown that focused ultrasound (FUS) pulses in low pressure range exerted bidirectional and brain state-dependent neuromodulation in the nonhuman primate somatosensory cortices by fMRI. Here we aim to gain insights about the proposed neuron selective modulation of FUS and probe fee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.12.003 |
_version_ | 1784862604767789056 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Pai-Feng Phipps, M. Anthony Newton, Allen T. Jonathan, Sumeeth Manuel, Thomas J. Gore, John C. Grissom, William A. Caskey, Charles F. Chen, Li Min |
author_facet | Yang, Pai-Feng Phipps, M. Anthony Newton, Allen T. Jonathan, Sumeeth Manuel, Thomas J. Gore, John C. Grissom, William A. Caskey, Charles F. Chen, Li Min |
author_sort | Yang, Pai-Feng |
collection | PubMed |
description | We have previously shown that focused ultrasound (FUS) pulses in low pressure range exerted bidirectional and brain state-dependent neuromodulation in the nonhuman primate somatosensory cortices by fMRI. Here we aim to gain insights about the proposed neuron selective modulation of FUS and probe feedforward versus feedback interactions by simultaneously quantifying the stimulus (FUS pressures: 925, 425, 250 kPa) and response (% BOLD fMRI changes) function at the targeted area 3a/3b and off-target cortical areas at 7T. In resting-state, lowered intensities of FUS resulted in decreased fMRI signal changes at the target area 3a/3b and off-target area 1/2, S2, MCC, insula and auditory cortex, and no signal difference in thalamic VPL and MD nuclei. In activated states, concurrent high-intensity FUS significantly enhanced touch-evoked signals in area 1/2. Medium- and low-intensity FUS significantly suppressed touch-evoked BOLD signals in all areas except in the auditory cortex, VPL and MD thalamic nuclei. Distinct state dependent and dose-response curves led us to hypothesize that FUS’s neuromodulatory effects may be mediated through preferential activation of different populations of neurons. Area 3a/3b may have distinct causal feedforward and feedback interactions with Area 1/2, S2, MCC, insula, and VPL. FUS offers a noninvasive neural stimulation tool for dissecting brain circuits and probing causal functional connections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9806861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98068612023-01-02 Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions Yang, Pai-Feng Phipps, M. Anthony Newton, Allen T. Jonathan, Sumeeth Manuel, Thomas J. Gore, John C. Grissom, William A. Caskey, Charles F. Chen, Li Min Brain Stimul Article We have previously shown that focused ultrasound (FUS) pulses in low pressure range exerted bidirectional and brain state-dependent neuromodulation in the nonhuman primate somatosensory cortices by fMRI. Here we aim to gain insights about the proposed neuron selective modulation of FUS and probe feedforward versus feedback interactions by simultaneously quantifying the stimulus (FUS pressures: 925, 425, 250 kPa) and response (% BOLD fMRI changes) function at the targeted area 3a/3b and off-target cortical areas at 7T. In resting-state, lowered intensities of FUS resulted in decreased fMRI signal changes at the target area 3a/3b and off-target area 1/2, S2, MCC, insula and auditory cortex, and no signal difference in thalamic VPL and MD nuclei. In activated states, concurrent high-intensity FUS significantly enhanced touch-evoked signals in area 1/2. Medium- and low-intensity FUS significantly suppressed touch-evoked BOLD signals in all areas except in the auditory cortex, VPL and MD thalamic nuclei. Distinct state dependent and dose-response curves led us to hypothesize that FUS’s neuromodulatory effects may be mediated through preferential activation of different populations of neurons. Area 3a/3b may have distinct causal feedforward and feedback interactions with Area 1/2, S2, MCC, insula, and VPL. FUS offers a noninvasive neural stimulation tool for dissecting brain circuits and probing causal functional connections. 2022 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9806861/ /pubmed/36496128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.12.003 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Yang, Pai-Feng Phipps, M. Anthony Newton, Allen T. Jonathan, Sumeeth Manuel, Thomas J. Gore, John C. Grissom, William A. Caskey, Charles F. Chen, Li Min Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions |
title | Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions |
title_full | Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions |
title_fullStr | Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions |
title_short | Differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions |
title_sort | differential dose responses of transcranial focused ultrasound at brain regions indicate causal interactions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36496128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.12.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangpaifeng differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions AT phippsmanthony differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions AT newtonallent differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions AT jonathansumeeth differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions AT manuelthomasj differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions AT gorejohnc differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions AT grissomwilliama differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions AT caskeycharlesf differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions AT chenlimin differentialdoseresponsesoftranscranialfocusedultrasoundatbrainregionsindicatecausalinteractions |