Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial

BACKGROUND: Integrating services for depression into primary care is key to reducing the treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries. We examined the value of providing the Healthy Activity Programme (HAP), a behavioral activation psychological intervention, within services for depression deli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldridge, L. R., Luitel, N. P., Jordans, M. J. D., Bass, J. K., Patenaude, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36618735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2022.54
_version_ 1784862625235992576
author Aldridge, L. R.
Luitel, N. P.
Jordans, M. J. D.
Bass, J. K.
Patenaude, B.
author_facet Aldridge, L. R.
Luitel, N. P.
Jordans, M. J. D.
Bass, J. K.
Patenaude, B.
author_sort Aldridge, L. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Integrating services for depression into primary care is key to reducing the treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries. We examined the value of providing the Healthy Activity Programme (HAP), a behavioral activation psychological intervention, within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Chitwan, Nepal using data from the Programme for Improving Mental Health Care. METHODS: People diagnosed with depression were randomized to receive either standard treatment (ST), comprised of psychoeducation, antidepressant medication, and home-based follow up, or standard treatment plus psychological intervention (T + P). We estimated incremental costs and health effects of T + P compared to ST, with quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and depression symptom scores over 12 months as health effects. Nonparametric uncertainty analysis provided confidence intervals around each incremental effectiveness ratio (ICER); results are presented in 2020 international dollars. RESULTS: Sixty participants received ST and 60 received T + P. Implementation costs (ST = $329, T + P = $617) were substantially higher than service delivery costs (ST = $18.7, T + P = $22.4) per participant. ST and T + P participants accrued 46.5 and 49.4 QALYs, respectively. The ICERs for T + P relative to ST were $4422 per QALY gained (95% confidence interval: $2484 to $9550) – slightly above the highly cost-effective threshold – and −$53.21 (95% confidence interval: −$105.8 to −$30.2) per unit change on the Patient Health Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Providing HAP within integrated depression services in Chitwan was cost-effective, if not highly cost-effective. Efforts to scale up integrated services in Nepal and similar contexts should consider including evidence-based psychological interventions as a part of cost-effective mental healthcare for depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9806977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98069772023-01-05 Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial Aldridge, L. R. Luitel, N. P. Jordans, M. J. D. Bass, J. K. Patenaude, B. Glob Ment Health (Camb) Original Research Paper BACKGROUND: Integrating services for depression into primary care is key to reducing the treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries. We examined the value of providing the Healthy Activity Programme (HAP), a behavioral activation psychological intervention, within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Chitwan, Nepal using data from the Programme for Improving Mental Health Care. METHODS: People diagnosed with depression were randomized to receive either standard treatment (ST), comprised of psychoeducation, antidepressant medication, and home-based follow up, or standard treatment plus psychological intervention (T + P). We estimated incremental costs and health effects of T + P compared to ST, with quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and depression symptom scores over 12 months as health effects. Nonparametric uncertainty analysis provided confidence intervals around each incremental effectiveness ratio (ICER); results are presented in 2020 international dollars. RESULTS: Sixty participants received ST and 60 received T + P. Implementation costs (ST = $329, T + P = $617) were substantially higher than service delivery costs (ST = $18.7, T + P = $22.4) per participant. ST and T + P participants accrued 46.5 and 49.4 QALYs, respectively. The ICERs for T + P relative to ST were $4422 per QALY gained (95% confidence interval: $2484 to $9550) – slightly above the highly cost-effective threshold – and −$53.21 (95% confidence interval: −$105.8 to −$30.2) per unit change on the Patient Health Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Providing HAP within integrated depression services in Chitwan was cost-effective, if not highly cost-effective. Efforts to scale up integrated services in Nepal and similar contexts should consider including evidence-based psychological interventions as a part of cost-effective mental healthcare for depression. Cambridge University Press 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9806977/ /pubmed/36618735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2022.54 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Paper
Aldridge, L. R.
Luitel, N. P.
Jordans, M. J. D.
Bass, J. K.
Patenaude, B.
Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial
title Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in Nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of psychological intervention within services for depression delivered by primary care workers in nepal: economic evaluation of a randomized control trial
topic Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36618735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2022.54
work_keys_str_mv AT aldridgelr costeffectivenessofpsychologicalinterventionwithinservicesfordepressiondeliveredbyprimarycareworkersinnepaleconomicevaluationofarandomizedcontroltrial
AT luitelnp costeffectivenessofpsychologicalinterventionwithinservicesfordepressiondeliveredbyprimarycareworkersinnepaleconomicevaluationofarandomizedcontroltrial
AT jordansmjd costeffectivenessofpsychologicalinterventionwithinservicesfordepressiondeliveredbyprimarycareworkersinnepaleconomicevaluationofarandomizedcontroltrial
AT bassjk costeffectivenessofpsychologicalinterventionwithinservicesfordepressiondeliveredbyprimarycareworkersinnepaleconomicevaluationofarandomizedcontroltrial
AT patenaudeb costeffectivenessofpsychologicalinterventionwithinservicesfordepressiondeliveredbyprimarycareworkersinnepaleconomicevaluationofarandomizedcontroltrial