Cargando…

Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy

BACKGROUND: Mini-BESTest is an instrument for assessing the balance impairment; however, the use of the Mini-BESTest in type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy is not well documented in the literature. The aim of this study was to examine the responsiveness and the minimal important chan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phyu, Sitt Nyein, Wanpen, Sawitri, Chatchawan, Uraiwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601428
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S392058
_version_ 1784862637917470720
author Phyu, Sitt Nyein
Wanpen, Sawitri
Chatchawan, Uraiwan
author_facet Phyu, Sitt Nyein
Wanpen, Sawitri
Chatchawan, Uraiwan
author_sort Phyu, Sitt Nyein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mini-BESTest is an instrument for assessing the balance impairment; however, the use of the Mini-BESTest in type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy is not well documented in the literature. The aim of this study was to examine the responsiveness and the minimal important change (MIC) of the Mini-BESTest after four weeks of the balance exercises. METHODS: A prospective single group pretest-posttest design was applied, and forty-eight type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy were participated (mean age of 59.04 ± 7.533 years; 3 males and 45 females). All participants were given an intervention program including foot care and balance exercises (50-minute sessions, three times a week for four weeks). The responsiveness of the Mini-BESTest was determined using two approaches: 1) the distribution-based method evaluating the change scores (pre- and post-intervention), the effect size (ES), the standard response mean (SRM), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimum detectable change (MDC(95)) and 2) the anchor-based method evaluating the MIC using the Global Rating of Change scale (GRC) as an external criterion. RESULTS: After the balance exercises treatment, the Mini-BESTest scores significantly improved (p < 0.001) with an ES of 3.9 and SRM of 4.32. SEM was 0.73 and MDC(95) was 2.03 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve corresponded to 81%. The cutoff point of the Mini-BESTest was ≥5 points corresponding to the GRC ≤3 versus >3 for the discrimination of the Mini-BESTest between improvement and no improvement after exercises. CONCLUSION: The Mini-BESTest can be demonstrated as high responsiveness according to the determination of the distribution-based and the anchor-based methods. The MIC of the Mini-BESTest was taken as ≥5 points and could be used as an outcome measure for the discriminated evaluation of type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9807068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98070682023-01-03 Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy Phyu, Sitt Nyein Wanpen, Sawitri Chatchawan, Uraiwan J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research BACKGROUND: Mini-BESTest is an instrument for assessing the balance impairment; however, the use of the Mini-BESTest in type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy is not well documented in the literature. The aim of this study was to examine the responsiveness and the minimal important change (MIC) of the Mini-BESTest after four weeks of the balance exercises. METHODS: A prospective single group pretest-posttest design was applied, and forty-eight type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy were participated (mean age of 59.04 ± 7.533 years; 3 males and 45 females). All participants were given an intervention program including foot care and balance exercises (50-minute sessions, three times a week for four weeks). The responsiveness of the Mini-BESTest was determined using two approaches: 1) the distribution-based method evaluating the change scores (pre- and post-intervention), the effect size (ES), the standard response mean (SRM), the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimum detectable change (MDC(95)) and 2) the anchor-based method evaluating the MIC using the Global Rating of Change scale (GRC) as an external criterion. RESULTS: After the balance exercises treatment, the Mini-BESTest scores significantly improved (p < 0.001) with an ES of 3.9 and SRM of 4.32. SEM was 0.73 and MDC(95) was 2.03 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve corresponded to 81%. The cutoff point of the Mini-BESTest was ≥5 points corresponding to the GRC ≤3 versus >3 for the discrimination of the Mini-BESTest between improvement and no improvement after exercises. CONCLUSION: The Mini-BESTest can be demonstrated as high responsiveness according to the determination of the distribution-based and the anchor-based methods. The MIC of the Mini-BESTest was taken as ≥5 points and could be used as an outcome measure for the discriminated evaluation of type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy. Dove 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9807068/ /pubmed/36601428 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S392058 Text en © 2022 Phyu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Phyu, Sitt Nyein
Wanpen, Sawitri
Chatchawan, Uraiwan
Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy
title Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy
title_full Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy
title_fullStr Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy
title_short Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Neuropathy
title_sort responsiveness of the mini-balance evaluation system test in type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601428
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S392058
work_keys_str_mv AT phyusittnyein responsivenessoftheminibalanceevaluationsystemtestintype2diabeticpatientswithperipheralneuropathy
AT wanpensawitri responsivenessoftheminibalanceevaluationsystemtestintype2diabeticpatientswithperipheralneuropathy
AT chatchawanuraiwan responsivenessoftheminibalanceevaluationsystemtestintype2diabeticpatientswithperipheralneuropathy