Cargando…

Prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Clinical inertia, defined as a failure of healthcare providers to initiate or intensify treatment when indicated, is one of the challenges in achieving glycemic targets in type 2 diabetes patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a Japanese medical database compiled from Diagnostic P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suzuki, Ryo, Kazumori, Kiyoyasu, Usui, Tatsuya, Shinohara, Masahiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13923
_version_ 1784862656754089984
author Suzuki, Ryo
Kazumori, Kiyoyasu
Usui, Tatsuya
Shinohara, Masahiko
author_facet Suzuki, Ryo
Kazumori, Kiyoyasu
Usui, Tatsuya
Shinohara, Masahiko
author_sort Suzuki, Ryo
collection PubMed
description AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Clinical inertia, defined as a failure of healthcare providers to initiate or intensify treatment when indicated, is one of the challenges in achieving glycemic targets in type 2 diabetes patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a Japanese medical database compiled from Diagnostic Procedure Combination hospitals, this retrospective study investigated clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes patients treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug. We analyzed predictors of clinical inertia, measured the time to treatment intensification, and monitored patients' glycemic control and renal function for 2 years. The index date was defined as the first date of hemoglobin A1c ≥7.0% during the 180 (±60) days after the first oral antidiabetic drug was prescribed. RESULTS: Clinical inertia was identified in 35.3% of patients. The median time to treatment intensification from the index date was 75.5 days. The proportion of patients achieving hemoglobin A1c <7.0% within 2 years was 33.8% with clinical inertia, and 47.9% without clinical inertia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Charlson Comorbidity Index score and an interval between visits of ≥6 weeks significantly increased the risk of developing clinical inertia, and hyperlipidemia and higher hemoglobin A1c at baseline significantly decreased the risk. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes patients treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug might have a lasting effect on long‐term glycemic control. Our findings will inform clinicians of the characteristics of patients associated with clinical inertia and the importance of providing appropriate treatment under clinical practice guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9807146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98071462023-01-04 Prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug Suzuki, Ryo Kazumori, Kiyoyasu Usui, Tatsuya Shinohara, Masahiko J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Clinical inertia, defined as a failure of healthcare providers to initiate or intensify treatment when indicated, is one of the challenges in achieving glycemic targets in type 2 diabetes patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a Japanese medical database compiled from Diagnostic Procedure Combination hospitals, this retrospective study investigated clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes patients treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug. We analyzed predictors of clinical inertia, measured the time to treatment intensification, and monitored patients' glycemic control and renal function for 2 years. The index date was defined as the first date of hemoglobin A1c ≥7.0% during the 180 (±60) days after the first oral antidiabetic drug was prescribed. RESULTS: Clinical inertia was identified in 35.3% of patients. The median time to treatment intensification from the index date was 75.5 days. The proportion of patients achieving hemoglobin A1c <7.0% within 2 years was 33.8% with clinical inertia, and 47.9% without clinical inertia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Charlson Comorbidity Index score and an interval between visits of ≥6 weeks significantly increased the risk of developing clinical inertia, and hyperlipidemia and higher hemoglobin A1c at baseline significantly decreased the risk. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes patients treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug might have a lasting effect on long‐term glycemic control. Our findings will inform clinicians of the characteristics of patients associated with clinical inertia and the importance of providing appropriate treatment under clinical practice guidelines. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9807146/ /pubmed/36229998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13923 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Suzuki, Ryo
Kazumori, Kiyoyasu
Usui, Tatsuya
Shinohara, Masahiko
Prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug
title Prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug
title_full Prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug
title_fullStr Prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug
title_short Prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug
title_sort prevalence and predictors of clinical inertia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with a single oral antidiabetic drug
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13923
work_keys_str_mv AT suzukiryo prevalenceandpredictorsofclinicalinertiainpatientswithtype2diabeteswhoweretreatedwithasingleoralantidiabeticdrug
AT kazumorikiyoyasu prevalenceandpredictorsofclinicalinertiainpatientswithtype2diabeteswhoweretreatedwithasingleoralantidiabeticdrug
AT usuitatsuya prevalenceandpredictorsofclinicalinertiainpatientswithtype2diabeteswhoweretreatedwithasingleoralantidiabeticdrug
AT shinoharamasahiko prevalenceandpredictorsofclinicalinertiainpatientswithtype2diabeteswhoweretreatedwithasingleoralantidiabeticdrug