Cargando…
RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
BACKGROUND: Genetic biomarkers guide systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) in metastatic colorectal cancer. It has been suggested they have a role in selecting patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36400886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12704-9 |
_version_ | 1784862743230152704 |
---|---|
author | Bhullar, Dilraj O’Dwyer, Sarah Wilson, Malcolm Saunders, Mark P. Kochhar, Rohit Barriuso, Jorge Aziz, Omer |
author_facet | Bhullar, Dilraj O’Dwyer, Sarah Wilson, Malcolm Saunders, Mark P. Kochhar, Rohit Barriuso, Jorge Aziz, Omer |
author_sort | Bhullar, Dilraj |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genetic biomarkers guide systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) in metastatic colorectal cancer. It has been suggested they have a role in selecting patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This study aims to quantify the effect of mutation status on overall survival (OS), adjusting for confounders such as pre-operative systemic anticancer treatment (SACT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for CRPM at a national peritoneal tumour centre (2004–2017) was performed. Demographics, treatment history and operative data were extracted. Known biomarker gene mutation status was noted including: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and MMR. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to determine overall survival. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five patients were included. Median follow-up time was 34.7 months (range 5.4–184.9 months) and median OS was 38.7 months (95% CI 32.4–44.9 months). Biomarker status was as follows: KRAS (n = 114), NRAS (n = 85), BRAF (n = 44), PIK3CA (n = 15) and MMR (n = 21). Mutation rates were 45.6%, 3.5%, 13.6%, 13.3% and 14.3%, respectively. Seventy-four per cent underwent complete cytoreduction (CC = 0), 81% received SACT pre-CRS/HIPEC and 65% post-CRS/HIPEC. RAS (p = 0.21) or BRAF (p = 0.109) mutation status did not predict OS. Nodal involvement, extramural vascular invasion, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score, CC score, SACT post-HIPEC and NRAS mutation were significant negative predictors of OS in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed CC-score > 1 (HR: 7.599, 95% CI 3.402–16.974, p < 0.0001) as a negative predictor of OS. RAS mutation status did not affect outcome (HR: 1.682, 95% CI 0.995–2.843, p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: RAS mutation status should not in isolation be used to select patients for CRS/HIPEC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9807544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98075442023-01-04 RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Bhullar, Dilraj O’Dwyer, Sarah Wilson, Malcolm Saunders, Mark P. Kochhar, Rohit Barriuso, Jorge Aziz, Omer Ann Surg Oncol Peritoneal Surface Malignancy BACKGROUND: Genetic biomarkers guide systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) in metastatic colorectal cancer. It has been suggested they have a role in selecting patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This study aims to quantify the effect of mutation status on overall survival (OS), adjusting for confounders such as pre-operative systemic anticancer treatment (SACT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for CRPM at a national peritoneal tumour centre (2004–2017) was performed. Demographics, treatment history and operative data were extracted. Known biomarker gene mutation status was noted including: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and MMR. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to determine overall survival. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five patients were included. Median follow-up time was 34.7 months (range 5.4–184.9 months) and median OS was 38.7 months (95% CI 32.4–44.9 months). Biomarker status was as follows: KRAS (n = 114), NRAS (n = 85), BRAF (n = 44), PIK3CA (n = 15) and MMR (n = 21). Mutation rates were 45.6%, 3.5%, 13.6%, 13.3% and 14.3%, respectively. Seventy-four per cent underwent complete cytoreduction (CC = 0), 81% received SACT pre-CRS/HIPEC and 65% post-CRS/HIPEC. RAS (p = 0.21) or BRAF (p = 0.109) mutation status did not predict OS. Nodal involvement, extramural vascular invasion, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score, CC score, SACT post-HIPEC and NRAS mutation were significant negative predictors of OS in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed CC-score > 1 (HR: 7.599, 95% CI 3.402–16.974, p < 0.0001) as a negative predictor of OS. RAS mutation status did not affect outcome (HR: 1.682, 95% CI 0.995–2.843, p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: RAS mutation status should not in isolation be used to select patients for CRS/HIPEC. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9807544/ /pubmed/36400886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12704-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Bhullar, Dilraj O’Dwyer, Sarah Wilson, Malcolm Saunders, Mark P. Kochhar, Rohit Barriuso, Jorge Aziz, Omer RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases |
title | RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases |
title_full | RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases |
title_fullStr | RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases |
title_short | RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases |
title_sort | ras mutation status should not be used to predict outcome from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases |
topic | Peritoneal Surface Malignancy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36400886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12704-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhullardilraj rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases AT odwyersarah rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases AT wilsonmalcolm rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases AT saundersmarkp rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases AT kochharrohit rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases AT barriusojorge rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases AT azizomer rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases |