Cargando…

RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases

BACKGROUND: Genetic biomarkers guide systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) in metastatic colorectal cancer. It has been suggested they have a role in selecting patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhullar, Dilraj, O’Dwyer, Sarah, Wilson, Malcolm, Saunders, Mark P., Kochhar, Rohit, Barriuso, Jorge, Aziz, Omer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36400886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12704-9
_version_ 1784862743230152704
author Bhullar, Dilraj
O’Dwyer, Sarah
Wilson, Malcolm
Saunders, Mark P.
Kochhar, Rohit
Barriuso, Jorge
Aziz, Omer
author_facet Bhullar, Dilraj
O’Dwyer, Sarah
Wilson, Malcolm
Saunders, Mark P.
Kochhar, Rohit
Barriuso, Jorge
Aziz, Omer
author_sort Bhullar, Dilraj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genetic biomarkers guide systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) in metastatic colorectal cancer. It has been suggested they have a role in selecting patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This study aims to quantify the effect of mutation status on overall survival (OS), adjusting for confounders such as pre-operative systemic anticancer treatment (SACT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for CRPM at a national peritoneal tumour centre (2004–2017) was performed. Demographics, treatment history and operative data were extracted. Known biomarker gene mutation status was noted including: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and MMR. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to determine overall survival. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five patients were included. Median follow-up time was 34.7 months (range 5.4–184.9 months) and median OS was 38.7 months (95% CI 32.4–44.9 months). Biomarker status was as follows: KRAS (n = 114), NRAS (n = 85), BRAF (n = 44), PIK3CA (n = 15) and MMR (n = 21). Mutation rates were 45.6%, 3.5%, 13.6%, 13.3% and 14.3%, respectively. Seventy-four per cent underwent complete cytoreduction (CC = 0), 81% received SACT pre-CRS/HIPEC and 65% post-CRS/HIPEC. RAS (p = 0.21) or BRAF (p = 0.109) mutation status did not predict OS. Nodal involvement, extramural vascular invasion, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score, CC score, SACT post-HIPEC and NRAS mutation were significant negative predictors of OS in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed CC-score > 1 (HR: 7.599, 95% CI 3.402–16.974, p < 0.0001) as a negative predictor of OS. RAS mutation status did not affect outcome (HR: 1.682, 95% CI 0.995–2.843, p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: RAS mutation status should not in isolation be used to select patients for CRS/HIPEC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9807544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98075442023-01-04 RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Bhullar, Dilraj O’Dwyer, Sarah Wilson, Malcolm Saunders, Mark P. Kochhar, Rohit Barriuso, Jorge Aziz, Omer Ann Surg Oncol Peritoneal Surface Malignancy BACKGROUND: Genetic biomarkers guide systemic anti-cancer treatment (SACT) in metastatic colorectal cancer. It has been suggested they have a role in selecting patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This study aims to quantify the effect of mutation status on overall survival (OS), adjusting for confounders such as pre-operative systemic anticancer treatment (SACT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for CRPM at a national peritoneal tumour centre (2004–2017) was performed. Demographics, treatment history and operative data were extracted. Known biomarker gene mutation status was noted including: KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and MMR. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier curves were used to determine overall survival. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five patients were included. Median follow-up time was 34.7 months (range 5.4–184.9 months) and median OS was 38.7 months (95% CI 32.4–44.9 months). Biomarker status was as follows: KRAS (n = 114), NRAS (n = 85), BRAF (n = 44), PIK3CA (n = 15) and MMR (n = 21). Mutation rates were 45.6%, 3.5%, 13.6%, 13.3% and 14.3%, respectively. Seventy-four per cent underwent complete cytoreduction (CC = 0), 81% received SACT pre-CRS/HIPEC and 65% post-CRS/HIPEC. RAS (p = 0.21) or BRAF (p = 0.109) mutation status did not predict OS. Nodal involvement, extramural vascular invasion, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) score, CC score, SACT post-HIPEC and NRAS mutation were significant negative predictors of OS in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed CC-score > 1 (HR: 7.599, 95% CI 3.402–16.974, p < 0.0001) as a negative predictor of OS. RAS mutation status did not affect outcome (HR: 1.682, 95% CI 0.995–2.843, p = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: RAS mutation status should not in isolation be used to select patients for CRS/HIPEC. Springer International Publishing 2022-11-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9807544/ /pubmed/36400886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12704-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
Bhullar, Dilraj
O’Dwyer, Sarah
Wilson, Malcolm
Saunders, Mark P.
Kochhar, Rohit
Barriuso, Jorge
Aziz, Omer
RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
title RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
title_full RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
title_fullStr RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
title_full_unstemmed RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
title_short RAS Mutation Status Should Not Be Used to Predict Outcome from Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
title_sort ras mutation status should not be used to predict outcome from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases
topic Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36400886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12704-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bhullardilraj rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT odwyersarah rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT wilsonmalcolm rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT saundersmarkp rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT kochharrohit rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT barriusojorge rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases
AT azizomer rasmutationstatusshouldnotbeusedtopredictoutcomefromcytoreductivesurgeryandhyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyforcolorectalperitonealmetastases