Cargando…

A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)

This study aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak (T2EL)-related re-intervention. The data of 455 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures between Januar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Zongwei, Chen, Yonghui, Qin, Yafei, Bi, Jiaxue, Wang, Jiaxin, Niu, Fang, Dai, Xiangchen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36593362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27356-8
_version_ 1784862750382489600
author Liu, Zongwei
Chen, Yonghui
Qin, Yafei
Bi, Jiaxue
Wang, Jiaxin
Niu, Fang
Dai, Xiangchen
author_facet Liu, Zongwei
Chen, Yonghui
Qin, Yafei
Bi, Jiaxue
Wang, Jiaxin
Niu, Fang
Dai, Xiangchen
author_sort Liu, Zongwei
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak (T2EL)-related re-intervention. The data of 455 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures between January 2018 and December 2021 at our single center were retrospectively reviewed. Following the implementation of exclusion criteria, 283 patients were finally included and divided into T2EL-related re-intervention (n = 42) and non-T2EL (n = 241) groups. The overall T2EL-related re-intervention rate for 283 patients was 14.8% (42/283). Using multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for re-intervention included age (OR, 1.172; 95% CI, 1.051–1.307; P = 0.004), smoking (OR, 13.418; 95% CI, 2.362–76.215; P = 0.003), diameter of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (OR, 21.380; 95% CI, 3.060–149.390; P = 0.002), and number of patent lumbar arteries (OR, 9.736; 95% CI, 3.175–29.857; P < 0.001). The discrimination ability of this risk-predictive model was reasonable (concordance index [C-index] = 0.921; 95% CI, 0.878–0.964). The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test was performed on the model, and the chi-square value was 3.210 (P = 0.920), presenting an excellent agreement between the model-predicted and observed values. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified that the risk thresholds of re-intervention were a diameter of > 2.77 mm for the diameter of the inferior mesenteric artery and a proportion of < 45.5% for thrombus volume in the aneurysm sac. This novel nomogram risk assessment model for predicting the possibility of patients’ T2EL-related re-interventions after EVAR should be helpful in discriminating high-risk patients. Two novel risk thresholds may imply a higher possibility of T2EL-related re-intervention after EVAR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9807575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98075752023-01-04 A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) Liu, Zongwei Chen, Yonghui Qin, Yafei Bi, Jiaxue Wang, Jiaxin Niu, Fang Dai, Xiangchen Sci Rep Article This study aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak (T2EL)-related re-intervention. The data of 455 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures between January 2018 and December 2021 at our single center were retrospectively reviewed. Following the implementation of exclusion criteria, 283 patients were finally included and divided into T2EL-related re-intervention (n = 42) and non-T2EL (n = 241) groups. The overall T2EL-related re-intervention rate for 283 patients was 14.8% (42/283). Using multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for re-intervention included age (OR, 1.172; 95% CI, 1.051–1.307; P = 0.004), smoking (OR, 13.418; 95% CI, 2.362–76.215; P = 0.003), diameter of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (OR, 21.380; 95% CI, 3.060–149.390; P = 0.002), and number of patent lumbar arteries (OR, 9.736; 95% CI, 3.175–29.857; P < 0.001). The discrimination ability of this risk-predictive model was reasonable (concordance index [C-index] = 0.921; 95% CI, 0.878–0.964). The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test was performed on the model, and the chi-square value was 3.210 (P = 0.920), presenting an excellent agreement between the model-predicted and observed values. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve identified that the risk thresholds of re-intervention were a diameter of > 2.77 mm for the diameter of the inferior mesenteric artery and a proportion of < 45.5% for thrombus volume in the aneurysm sac. This novel nomogram risk assessment model for predicting the possibility of patients’ T2EL-related re-interventions after EVAR should be helpful in discriminating high-risk patients. Two novel risk thresholds may imply a higher possibility of T2EL-related re-intervention after EVAR. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9807575/ /pubmed/36593362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27356-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Zongwei
Chen, Yonghui
Qin, Yafei
Bi, Jiaxue
Wang, Jiaxin
Niu, Fang
Dai, Xiangchen
A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)
title A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)
title_full A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)
title_fullStr A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)
title_full_unstemmed A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)
title_short A nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type II endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)
title_sort nomogram risk assessment model to predict the possibility of type ii endoleak-related re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (evar)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36593362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27356-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzongwei anomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT chenyonghui anomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT qinyafei anomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT bijiaxue anomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT wangjiaxin anomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT niufang anomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT daixiangchen anomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT liuzongwei nomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT chenyonghui nomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT qinyafei nomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT bijiaxue nomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT wangjiaxin nomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT niufang nomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar
AT daixiangchen nomogramriskassessmentmodeltopredictthepossibilityoftypeiiendoleakrelatedreinterventionafterendovascularaneurysmrepairevar