Cargando…

Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam compu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizzo, Gabriel, Prado, Mayara Colpo, Rigo, Lilian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605853
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220059
_version_ 1784862790235717632
author Rizzo, Gabriel
Prado, Mayara Colpo
Rigo, Lilian
author_facet Rizzo, Gabriel
Prado, Mayara Colpo
Rigo, Lilian
author_sort Rizzo, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam computed tomography from 2017 to 2020. The following variables were considered: thread exposure, violation of the minimum distance between 2 adjacent implants and between the implant and tooth, and implant contact with anatomical structures. Descriptive data analysis and the Pearson chi-square test (P<0.05) were performed to compare findings according to mouth regions. RESULTS: Most (74.4%) of the 590 implants were poorly positioned, with the posterior region of the maxilla being the region most frequently affected by errors. Among the variables analyzed, the most prevalent was thread exposure (54.7%), followed by implant contact with anatomical structures, violation of the recommended distance between 2 implants and violation of the recommended distance between the implant and teeth. Thread exposure was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible (P<0.05). The anterior region of the maxilla was associated with violation of the recommended tooth-implant distance (P<0.05) and the recommended distance between 2 adjacent implants (P<0.05). Implant contact with anatomical structures was significantly more likely to occur in the posterior region of the maxilla (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Many implants were poorly positioned in the posterior region of the maxilla. Thread exposure was particularly frequent and was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9807798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98077982023-01-04 Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study Rizzo, Gabriel Prado, Mayara Colpo Rigo, Lilian Imaging Sci Dent Original Article PURPOSE: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam computed tomography from 2017 to 2020. The following variables were considered: thread exposure, violation of the minimum distance between 2 adjacent implants and between the implant and tooth, and implant contact with anatomical structures. Descriptive data analysis and the Pearson chi-square test (P<0.05) were performed to compare findings according to mouth regions. RESULTS: Most (74.4%) of the 590 implants were poorly positioned, with the posterior region of the maxilla being the region most frequently affected by errors. Among the variables analyzed, the most prevalent was thread exposure (54.7%), followed by implant contact with anatomical structures, violation of the recommended distance between 2 implants and violation of the recommended distance between the implant and teeth. Thread exposure was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible (P<0.05). The anterior region of the maxilla was associated with violation of the recommended tooth-implant distance (P<0.05) and the recommended distance between 2 adjacent implants (P<0.05). Implant contact with anatomical structures was significantly more likely to occur in the posterior region of the maxilla (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Many implants were poorly positioned in the posterior region of the maxilla. Thread exposure was particularly frequent and was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible. Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2022-12 2022-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9807798/ /pubmed/36605853 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220059 Text en Copyright © 2022 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rizzo, Gabriel
Prado, Mayara Colpo
Rigo, Lilian
Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study
title Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study
title_full Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study
title_short Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study
title_sort prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605853
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220059
work_keys_str_mv AT rizzogabriel prevalenceofdentalimplantpositioningerrorsacrosssectionalstudy
AT pradomayaracolpo prevalenceofdentalimplantpositioningerrorsacrosssectionalstudy
AT rigolilian prevalenceofdentalimplantpositioningerrorsacrosssectionalstudy