Cargando…

Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study

BACKGROUND: Present study was performed to assess the biologic width relocation by performing aesthetic crown lengthening with the help of Chu aesthetic gauges. METHODS: The study included 192 teeth from 17 individuals, of which 64 teeth underwent crown lengthening (Treated site- TS) and 128 of whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rani, Avantika, Gummaluri, Shiva Shankar, Bhattacharya, Hirak S., Bhattacharya, Preeti, Saifi, Sumbul, saummya singh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.12.006
_version_ 1784862837340897280
author Rani, Avantika
Gummaluri, Shiva Shankar
Bhattacharya, Hirak S.
Bhattacharya, Preeti
Saifi, Sumbul
saummya singh
author_facet Rani, Avantika
Gummaluri, Shiva Shankar
Bhattacharya, Hirak S.
Bhattacharya, Preeti
Saifi, Sumbul
saummya singh
author_sort Rani, Avantika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Present study was performed to assess the biologic width relocation by performing aesthetic crown lengthening with the help of Chu aesthetic gauges. METHODS: The study included 192 teeth from 17 individuals, of which 64 teeth underwent crown lengthening (Treated site- TS) and 128 of which shared a proximal surface (Adjacent site –AS, Non-Adjacent site- NAS) with the surgery site. The clinical parameters Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), gingival margin position (PGM), relative attachment level (RAL), bone sounding (BS), biological width (BW), and probing depth (PD) were recorded. The clinical recordings were made at three different times: at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Statistical analysis was performed using one way ANOVA and for pair wise comparisons post hoc Tukey test was used. Data was expressed in mean and standard deviations. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: PI and GI showed significant difference (p = 0.000*) at all time intervals. PGM and RAL were significant from baseline to 3 months, baseline to 6 months (p = 0.000*) while non-significance (p > 0.05) was recorded at 3–6 months comparison for PGM, RAL, BS, BW and PD. CONCLUSION: Present study concluded that usage of Chu Aesthetic gauges help in controlled removal of soft and hard tissues, biologic width and gingival margin position got stabilized within 3 months and final prosthesis can be advised after 3 months of surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9807997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98079972023-01-04 Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study Rani, Avantika Gummaluri, Shiva Shankar Bhattacharya, Hirak S. Bhattacharya, Preeti Saifi, Sumbul saummya singh J Oral Biol Craniofac Res Article BACKGROUND: Present study was performed to assess the biologic width relocation by performing aesthetic crown lengthening with the help of Chu aesthetic gauges. METHODS: The study included 192 teeth from 17 individuals, of which 64 teeth underwent crown lengthening (Treated site- TS) and 128 of which shared a proximal surface (Adjacent site –AS, Non-Adjacent site- NAS) with the surgery site. The clinical parameters Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), gingival margin position (PGM), relative attachment level (RAL), bone sounding (BS), biological width (BW), and probing depth (PD) were recorded. The clinical recordings were made at three different times: at baseline, 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Statistical analysis was performed using one way ANOVA and for pair wise comparisons post hoc Tukey test was used. Data was expressed in mean and standard deviations. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: PI and GI showed significant difference (p = 0.000*) at all time intervals. PGM and RAL were significant from baseline to 3 months, baseline to 6 months (p = 0.000*) while non-significance (p > 0.05) was recorded at 3–6 months comparison for PGM, RAL, BS, BW and PD. CONCLUSION: Present study concluded that usage of Chu Aesthetic gauges help in controlled removal of soft and hard tissues, biologic width and gingival margin position got stabilized within 3 months and final prosthesis can be advised after 3 months of surgery. Elsevier 2023 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9807997/ /pubmed/36605773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.12.006 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rani, Avantika
Gummaluri, Shiva Shankar
Bhattacharya, Hirak S.
Bhattacharya, Preeti
Saifi, Sumbul
saummya singh
Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study
title Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study
title_full Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study
title_fullStr Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study
title_short Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study
title_sort evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using chu aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9807997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.12.006
work_keys_str_mv AT raniavantika evaluationofbiologicwidthreestablishmentusingchuaestheticgaugesincrownlengtheningcasesaclinicalstudy
AT gummalurishivashankar evaluationofbiologicwidthreestablishmentusingchuaestheticgaugesincrownlengtheningcasesaclinicalstudy
AT bhattacharyahiraks evaluationofbiologicwidthreestablishmentusingchuaestheticgaugesincrownlengtheningcasesaclinicalstudy
AT bhattacharyapreeti evaluationofbiologicwidthreestablishmentusingchuaestheticgaugesincrownlengtheningcasesaclinicalstudy
AT saifisumbul evaluationofbiologicwidthreestablishmentusingchuaestheticgaugesincrownlengtheningcasesaclinicalstudy
AT saummyasingh evaluationofbiologicwidthreestablishmentusingchuaestheticgaugesincrownlengtheningcasesaclinicalstudy