Cargando…
Multiple-instance-learning-based detection of coeliac disease in histological whole-slide images
We present a multiple-instance-learning-based scheme for detecting coeliac disease, an autoimmune disorder affecting the intestine, in histological whole-slide images (WSIs) of duodenal biopsies. We train our model to detect 2 distinct classes, normal tissue and coeliac disease, on the patch-level,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100151 |
Sumario: | We present a multiple-instance-learning-based scheme for detecting coeliac disease, an autoimmune disorder affecting the intestine, in histological whole-slide images (WSIs) of duodenal biopsies. We train our model to detect 2 distinct classes, normal tissue and coeliac disease, on the patch-level, and in turn leverage slide-level classifications. Using 5-fold cross-validation in a training set of 1841 (1163 normal; 680 coeliac disease) WSIs, our model classifies slides as normal with accuracy (96.7±0.6)%, precision (98.0±1.7)%, and recall (96.8±2.5)%, and as coeliac disease with accuracy (96.7±0.5)%, precision (94.9±3.7)%, and recall (96.5±2.9)% where the error bars are the cross-validation standard deviation. We apply our model to 2 test sets: one containing 191 WSIs (126 normal; 65 coeliac) from the same sources as the training data, and another from a completely independent source, containing 34 WSIs (17 normal; 17 coeliac), obtained with a scanner model not represented in the training data. Using the same-source test data, our model classifies slides as normal with accuracy 96.5%, precision 98.4% and recall 96.1%, and positive for coeliac disease with accuracy 96.5%, precision 93.5%, and recall 97.3%. Using the different-source test data the model classifies slides as normal with accuracy 94.1% (32/34), precision 89.5%, and recall 100%, and as positive for coeliac disease with accuracy 94.1%, precision 100%, and recall 88.2%. We discuss generalising our approach to screen for a range of pathologies. |
---|