The implications of an integrated management model of prenatal diagnosis/postnatal treatment for premature infants with critical congenital heart disease—a case-control study

BACKGROUND: The high death rate and medical costs of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) in preterm infants has resulted in significant burdens on both countries and individuals. It is unclear how this affects the mortality of the integrated management model of prenatal diagnosis/postnatal treatment. This study explored the effects of the delivery classification scale for fetal heart and postnatal infants’ CCHD on prenatal and postnatal integrated treatment strategies to improve the effectiveness of disease management in CCHD. METHODS: This study was a case-control study, which retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 79 preterm infants (<37 weeks) who underwent prenatal diagnosis and postpartum treatment in Guangdong Provincial People’ s Hospital (China) from June 2017 to June 2019. According to the diagnostic and exclusion criteria, the subjects were divided into prenatal and postpartum diagnostic groups. The clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients were collected and compared. The delivery classification scale was used for risk stratification and patient management. RESULTS: Among the 79 patients included in this study, 48 (60.76%) were diagnosed prenatally, and 31 (39.24%) were diagnosed postpartum. The prenatal diagnosis group was born slightly earlier during the gestation period [35.00 (33.29–35.86) vs. 35.57 (34.14–36.71) weeks, P<0.05], and their mothers were older (33.23±5.22 vs. 30.43±6.37 years, P<0.05). The difference in the admission age between the groups was statistically significant [0 (0–5.5) vs. 7 (5–16) days, P<0.001]. The median survival time of the prenatal diagnosis group was higher than the postnatal diagnosis group [48 months (95% CI: 40.78–57.29) vs. 39 months (95% CI: 34.41–44.32), P<0.05]. The 3-year survival rates of the classes I, II, and III were 92.31% (12/13), 59.09% (13/22), and 38.46% (5/13), respectively. The survival of class I as denoted in the delivery classification scale was better than classes II or III (class I vs. II, P<0.05; class I vs. III, P<0.05). Unexpectedly, the hospitalisation costs were lower and total in-hospital days were shorter in the postnatal diagnosis group. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that the integrated management of a prenatal diagnosis/postnatal treatment approach in premature infants may be effective. Furthermore, the delivery classification scale has a particular prognostic value for CCHD. The authors anticipate that their management model will be able to contribute to the shift from a reactive monodisciplinary system to a proactive, multidisciplinary and dynamic management paradigm in premature infants with CCHD in the near future.