Cargando…

Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND: MR or CT scans are often required in the treatment of pediatric intensive care patients. During the therefore needed intrahospital transport continuous ventilation of the patient must be maintained. Intrahospital transport is considered safe regarding changes in hemodynamics or adverse e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oettgen, Fabienne, Shehu, Nerejda, Stern, Heiko, Ewert, Peter, Meierhofer, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605079
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-22-384
_version_ 1784862865572757504
author Oettgen, Fabienne
Shehu, Nerejda
Stern, Heiko
Ewert, Peter
Meierhofer, Christian
author_facet Oettgen, Fabienne
Shehu, Nerejda
Stern, Heiko
Ewert, Peter
Meierhofer, Christian
author_sort Oettgen, Fabienne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: MR or CT scans are often required in the treatment of pediatric intensive care patients. During the therefore needed intrahospital transport continuous ventilation of the patient must be maintained. Intrahospital transport is considered safe regarding changes in hemodynamics or adverse events (AEs). As those studies cover inhomogeneous patient groups, we analyzed the safety for ventilated pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) focusing on differences between manual and mechanical ventilation during transport and examination. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric case-control study covering a 10 years’ period in a tertiary cardiac center for CHD. Sixty-three critically ill ventilator-dependent patients, median 2 (0–37) months, were included. Fifty-one patients got ventilated manually and 12 patients got ventilated with a mobile ventilator. The data include vital parameters and blood gas data, as well as catecholamine support, occurrence of AEs and total duration of transport and examination. RESULTS: In both groups we found minor changes of vital parameters or blood gas data. Regarding the HR we found a drop from median 135/min before leaving the ICU to 130/min after returning to the ICU (P=0.0072) in the manually ventilated group and a drop from median 133/min to 123/min (P=0.0703) in the mechanically ventilated group. The median transport time including scan was higher in the manually ventilated group (P=0.0098) with a median duration of transport and scan time of 100 minutes (30–245 minutes) in the manually ventilated group and of 97.5 minutes (60–224 minutes) in the mechanically ventilated group. A total of 9 AEs was recorded, 7 (13.7%) of them in the manually and 2 (16.7%) in the mechanically ventilated group with a drop of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and an increase in catecholamine support. CONCLUSIONS: We consider both manual ventilation and mechanical ventilation for intrahospital transport safe for pediatric intensive care patients with CHD. Using a mechanical ventilator might have the advantage to react faster to changes in hemodynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98081132023-01-04 Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease Oettgen, Fabienne Shehu, Nerejda Stern, Heiko Ewert, Peter Meierhofer, Christian Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: MR or CT scans are often required in the treatment of pediatric intensive care patients. During the therefore needed intrahospital transport continuous ventilation of the patient must be maintained. Intrahospital transport is considered safe regarding changes in hemodynamics or adverse events (AEs). As those studies cover inhomogeneous patient groups, we analyzed the safety for ventilated pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) focusing on differences between manual and mechanical ventilation during transport and examination. METHODS: Retrospective monocentric case-control study covering a 10 years’ period in a tertiary cardiac center for CHD. Sixty-three critically ill ventilator-dependent patients, median 2 (0–37) months, were included. Fifty-one patients got ventilated manually and 12 patients got ventilated with a mobile ventilator. The data include vital parameters and blood gas data, as well as catecholamine support, occurrence of AEs and total duration of transport and examination. RESULTS: In both groups we found minor changes of vital parameters or blood gas data. Regarding the HR we found a drop from median 135/min before leaving the ICU to 130/min after returning to the ICU (P=0.0072) in the manually ventilated group and a drop from median 133/min to 123/min (P=0.0703) in the mechanically ventilated group. The median transport time including scan was higher in the manually ventilated group (P=0.0098) with a median duration of transport and scan time of 100 minutes (30–245 minutes) in the manually ventilated group and of 97.5 minutes (60–224 minutes) in the mechanically ventilated group. A total of 9 AEs was recorded, 7 (13.7%) of them in the manually and 2 (16.7%) in the mechanically ventilated group with a drop of the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and an increase in catecholamine support. CONCLUSIONS: We consider both manual ventilation and mechanical ventilation for intrahospital transport safe for pediatric intensive care patients with CHD. Using a mechanical ventilator might have the advantage to react faster to changes in hemodynamics. AME Publishing Company 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9808113/ /pubmed/36605079 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-22-384 Text en 2022 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Oettgen, Fabienne
Shehu, Nerejda
Stern, Heiko
Ewert, Peter
Meierhofer, Christian
Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease
title Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease
title_full Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease
title_fullStr Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease
title_full_unstemmed Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease
title_short Safety of intrahospital transport for MR or CT scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease
title_sort safety of intrahospital transport for mr or ct scans in ventilated pediatric intensive care patients with congenital heart disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36605079
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-22-384
work_keys_str_mv AT oettgenfabienne safetyofintrahospitaltransportformrorctscansinventilatedpediatricintensivecarepatientswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT shehunerejda safetyofintrahospitaltransportformrorctscansinventilatedpediatricintensivecarepatientswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT sternheiko safetyofintrahospitaltransportformrorctscansinventilatedpediatricintensivecarepatientswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT ewertpeter safetyofintrahospitaltransportformrorctscansinventilatedpediatricintensivecarepatientswithcongenitalheartdisease
AT meierhoferchristian safetyofintrahospitaltransportformrorctscansinventilatedpediatricintensivecarepatientswithcongenitalheartdisease