Cargando…

How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries

Background: In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Norway, point-of-care testing (POCT) is more widely implemented in general practice compared to countries such as England and Australia. To comprehend what is necessary to realize the benefits of POCT, regarding its integration in primary ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lingervelder, Deon, Koffijberg, Hendrik, Emery, Jon D., Fennessy, Paul, Price, Christopher P., van Marwijk, Harm, Eide, Torunn B., Sandberg, Sverre, Cals, Jochen W.L., Derksen, Joke T.M., Kusters, Ron, IJzerman, Maarten J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34814677
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.143
_version_ 1784862908580102144
author Lingervelder, Deon
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Emery, Jon D.
Fennessy, Paul
Price, Christopher P.
van Marwijk, Harm
Eide, Torunn B.
Sandberg, Sverre
Cals, Jochen W.L.
Derksen, Joke T.M.
Kusters, Ron
IJzerman, Maarten J.
author_facet Lingervelder, Deon
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Emery, Jon D.
Fennessy, Paul
Price, Christopher P.
van Marwijk, Harm
Eide, Torunn B.
Sandberg, Sverre
Cals, Jochen W.L.
Derksen, Joke T.M.
Kusters, Ron
IJzerman, Maarten J.
author_sort Lingervelder, Deon
collection PubMed
description Background: In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Norway, point-of-care testing (POCT) is more widely implemented in general practice compared to countries such as England and Australia. To comprehend what is necessary to realize the benefits of POCT, regarding its integration in primary care, it would be beneficial to have an overview of the structure of healthcare operations and the transactions between stakeholders (also referred to as value networks). The aim of this paper is to identify the current value networks in place applying to POCT implementation at general practices in England, Australia, Norway and the Netherlands and to compare these networks in terms of seven previously published factors that support the successful implementation, sustainability and scale-up of innovations. Methods: The value networks were described based on formal guidelines and standards published by the respective governments, organizational bodies and affiliates. The value network of each country was validated by at least two relevant stakeholders from the respective country. Results: The analysis revealed that the biggest challenge for countries with low POCT uptake was the lack of effective communication between the several organizations involved with POCT as well as the high workload for general practitioners (GPs) aiming to implement POCT. It is observed that countries with a single national authority responsible for POCT have a better uptake as they can govern the task of POCT roll-out and management and reduce the workload for GPs by assisting with set-up, quality control, training and support. Conclusion: Setting up a single national authority may be an effective step towards realizing the full benefits of POCT. Although it is possible for day-to-day operations to fall under the responsibility of the GP, this is only feasible if support and guidance are readily available to ensure that the workload associated with POCT is limited and as low as possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98082892023-01-10 How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries Lingervelder, Deon Koffijberg, Hendrik Emery, Jon D. Fennessy, Paul Price, Christopher P. van Marwijk, Harm Eide, Torunn B. Sandberg, Sverre Cals, Jochen W.L. Derksen, Joke T.M. Kusters, Ron IJzerman, Maarten J. Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Norway, point-of-care testing (POCT) is more widely implemented in general practice compared to countries such as England and Australia. To comprehend what is necessary to realize the benefits of POCT, regarding its integration in primary care, it would be beneficial to have an overview of the structure of healthcare operations and the transactions between stakeholders (also referred to as value networks). The aim of this paper is to identify the current value networks in place applying to POCT implementation at general practices in England, Australia, Norway and the Netherlands and to compare these networks in terms of seven previously published factors that support the successful implementation, sustainability and scale-up of innovations. Methods: The value networks were described based on formal guidelines and standards published by the respective governments, organizational bodies and affiliates. The value network of each country was validated by at least two relevant stakeholders from the respective country. Results: The analysis revealed that the biggest challenge for countries with low POCT uptake was the lack of effective communication between the several organizations involved with POCT as well as the high workload for general practitioners (GPs) aiming to implement POCT. It is observed that countries with a single national authority responsible for POCT have a better uptake as they can govern the task of POCT roll-out and management and reduce the workload for GPs by assisting with set-up, quality control, training and support. Conclusion: Setting up a single national authority may be an effective step towards realizing the full benefits of POCT. Although it is possible for day-to-day operations to fall under the responsibility of the GP, this is only feasible if support and guidance are readily available to ensure that the workload associated with POCT is limited and as low as possible. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9808289/ /pubmed/34814677 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.143 Text en © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lingervelder, Deon
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Emery, Jon D.
Fennessy, Paul
Price, Christopher P.
van Marwijk, Harm
Eide, Torunn B.
Sandberg, Sverre
Cals, Jochen W.L.
Derksen, Joke T.M.
Kusters, Ron
IJzerman, Maarten J.
How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries
title How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries
title_full How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries
title_fullStr How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries
title_full_unstemmed How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries
title_short How to Realize the Benefits of Point-of-Care Testing at the General Practice: A Comparison of Four High-Income Countries
title_sort how to realize the benefits of point-of-care testing at the general practice: a comparison of four high-income countries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34814677
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.143
work_keys_str_mv AT lingervelderdeon howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT koffijberghendrik howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT emeryjond howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT fennessypaul howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT pricechristopherp howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT vanmarwijkharm howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT eidetorunnb howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT sandbergsverre howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT calsjochenwl howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT derksenjoketm howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT kustersron howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries
AT ijzermanmaartenj howtorealizethebenefitsofpointofcaretestingatthegeneralpracticeacomparisonoffourhighincomecountries