Cargando…

Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design

Background: Across most healthcare systems, patients are the primary focus. Patient involvements enhance their adherence to treatment, which in return, influences their health. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics (ie, attributes) and associated levels (ie, values of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coulibaly, Lucien P., Poder, Thomas G., Tousignant, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34861762
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.150
_version_ 1784862908820226048
author Coulibaly, Lucien P.
Poder, Thomas G.
Tousignant, Michel
author_facet Coulibaly, Lucien P.
Poder, Thomas G.
Tousignant, Michel
author_sort Coulibaly, Lucien P.
collection PubMed
description Background: Across most healthcare systems, patients are the primary focus. Patient involvements enhance their adherence to treatment, which in return, influences their health. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics (ie, attributes) and associated levels (ie, values of the characteristics) that are the most important for patients regarding telerehabilitation (TR) healthcare to support a future discrete choice experiment (DCE) study design. Methods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted from January 2005 to the end of July 2020 and the search strategy was applied to five different databases. The initial selection of articles that met the eligibility criteria was independently made by one researcher, two researchers verified the accuracy of the extracted data, and all researchers discussed about relevant variables to include. Reporting of this systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of the study. A qualitative synthesis was used to summarize findings. Results: From a total of 928 articles, 11 (qualitative [n = 5], quantitative [n = 3] and mixed-methods [n = 3] design) were included, and 25 attributes were identified and grouped into 13 categories: Accessibility, Distance, Interaction, Technology experience, Treatment mode, Treatment location, Physician contact mode, Physician contact frequency, Cost, Confidence, Ease of use, Feeling safer, and Training session. The attributes levels varied from two to five. The DCE studies identified showed the main stages to undertake these types of studies. Conclusion: This study could guide the development of interview grid for individual interviews and focus groups to support a DCE study design in the TR field. By understanding the characteristics that enhance patients’ preferences, healthcare providers can create or improve TR programs that provide high-quality and accessible care. Future research via a DCE is needed to determine the relative importance of the attributes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98082902023-01-10 Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design Coulibaly, Lucien P. Poder, Thomas G. Tousignant, Michel Int J Health Policy Manag Systematic Review Background: Across most healthcare systems, patients are the primary focus. Patient involvements enhance their adherence to treatment, which in return, influences their health. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics (ie, attributes) and associated levels (ie, values of the characteristics) that are the most important for patients regarding telerehabilitation (TR) healthcare to support a future discrete choice experiment (DCE) study design. Methods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted from January 2005 to the end of July 2020 and the search strategy was applied to five different databases. The initial selection of articles that met the eligibility criteria was independently made by one researcher, two researchers verified the accuracy of the extracted data, and all researchers discussed about relevant variables to include. Reporting of this systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of the study. A qualitative synthesis was used to summarize findings. Results: From a total of 928 articles, 11 (qualitative [n = 5], quantitative [n = 3] and mixed-methods [n = 3] design) were included, and 25 attributes were identified and grouped into 13 categories: Accessibility, Distance, Interaction, Technology experience, Treatment mode, Treatment location, Physician contact mode, Physician contact frequency, Cost, Confidence, Ease of use, Feeling safer, and Training session. The attributes levels varied from two to five. The DCE studies identified showed the main stages to undertake these types of studies. Conclusion: This study could guide the development of interview grid for individual interviews and focus groups to support a DCE study design in the TR field. By understanding the characteristics that enhance patients’ preferences, healthcare providers can create or improve TR programs that provide high-quality and accessible care. Future research via a DCE is needed to determine the relative importance of the attributes. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9808290/ /pubmed/34861762 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.150 Text en © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Coulibaly, Lucien P.
Poder, Thomas G.
Tousignant, Michel
Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design
title Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design
title_full Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design
title_fullStr Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design
title_full_unstemmed Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design
title_short Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design
title_sort attributes underlying patient choice for telerehabilitation treatment: a mixed-methods systematic review to support a discrete choice experiment study design
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34861762
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.150
work_keys_str_mv AT coulibalylucienp attributesunderlyingpatientchoicefortelerehabilitationtreatmentamixedmethodssystematicreviewtosupportadiscretechoiceexperimentstudydesign
AT poderthomasg attributesunderlyingpatientchoicefortelerehabilitationtreatmentamixedmethodssystematicreviewtosupportadiscretechoiceexperimentstudydesign
AT tousignantmichel attributesunderlyingpatientchoicefortelerehabilitationtreatmentamixedmethodssystematicreviewtosupportadiscretechoiceexperimentstudydesign