Cargando…

Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015

Background: Despite Uganda and other sub-Saharan African countries missing their maternal mortality ratio (MMR) targets for Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5, limited attention has been paid to policy design in the literature examining the persistence of preventable maternal mortality. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukuru, Moses, Gorry, Jonathan, Kiwanuka, Suzanne N., Gibson, Linda, Musoke, David, Ssengooba, Freddie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34664495
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.127
_version_ 1784862910583930880
author Mukuru, Moses
Gorry, Jonathan
Kiwanuka, Suzanne N.
Gibson, Linda
Musoke, David
Ssengooba, Freddie
author_facet Mukuru, Moses
Gorry, Jonathan
Kiwanuka, Suzanne N.
Gibson, Linda
Musoke, David
Ssengooba, Freddie
author_sort Mukuru, Moses
collection PubMed
description Background: Despite Uganda and other sub-Saharan African countries missing their maternal mortality ratio (MMR) targets for Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5, limited attention has been paid to policy design in the literature examining the persistence of preventable maternal mortality. This study examined the specific policy interventions designed to reduce maternal deaths in Uganda and identified particular policy design issues that underpinned MDG 5 performance. We suggest a novel prescriptive and analytical (re)conceptualization of policy in terms of its fidelity to ‘3Cs’ (coherence of design, comprehensiveness of coverage and consistency in application) that could have implications for future healthcare programming. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study. Sixteen Ugandan maternal health policy documents and 21 national programme performance reports were examined, and six key informant interviews conducted with national stakeholders managing maternal health programmes during the reference period 2000-2015. We applied the analytical framework of the ‘three delay model’ combined with a broader literature on ‘policy mixing’. Results: Despite introducing fourteen separate policy instruments over 15 years with the goal of reducing maternal mortality, by the end of the MDG period in 2015, only 87.5% of the interventions for the three delays were covered with a notable lack of coherence and consistency evident among the instruments. The three delays persisted at the frontline with 70% of deaths by 2014 attributed to failures in referral policies while 67% of maternal deaths were due to inadequacies in healthcare facilities and trained personnel in the same period. By 2015, 37.3% of deaths were due to transportation issues. Conclusion: The piecemeal introduction of additional policy instruments frequently distorted existing synergies among policies resulting in persistence of the three delays and missed MDG 5 target. Future policy reforms should address the ‘three delays’ but also ensure fidelity of policy design to coherence, comprehensiveness and consistency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9808297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98082972023-01-10 Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015 Mukuru, Moses Gorry, Jonathan Kiwanuka, Suzanne N. Gibson, Linda Musoke, David Ssengooba, Freddie Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Despite Uganda and other sub-Saharan African countries missing their maternal mortality ratio (MMR) targets for Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5, limited attention has been paid to policy design in the literature examining the persistence of preventable maternal mortality. This study examined the specific policy interventions designed to reduce maternal deaths in Uganda and identified particular policy design issues that underpinned MDG 5 performance. We suggest a novel prescriptive and analytical (re)conceptualization of policy in terms of its fidelity to ‘3Cs’ (coherence of design, comprehensiveness of coverage and consistency in application) that could have implications for future healthcare programming. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study. Sixteen Ugandan maternal health policy documents and 21 national programme performance reports were examined, and six key informant interviews conducted with national stakeholders managing maternal health programmes during the reference period 2000-2015. We applied the analytical framework of the ‘three delay model’ combined with a broader literature on ‘policy mixing’. Results: Despite introducing fourteen separate policy instruments over 15 years with the goal of reducing maternal mortality, by the end of the MDG period in 2015, only 87.5% of the interventions for the three delays were covered with a notable lack of coherence and consistency evident among the instruments. The three delays persisted at the frontline with 70% of deaths by 2014 attributed to failures in referral policies while 67% of maternal deaths were due to inadequacies in healthcare facilities and trained personnel in the same period. By 2015, 37.3% of deaths were due to transportation issues. Conclusion: The piecemeal introduction of additional policy instruments frequently distorted existing synergies among policies resulting in persistence of the three delays and missed MDG 5 target. Future policy reforms should address the ‘three delays’ but also ensure fidelity of policy design to coherence, comprehensiveness and consistency. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9808297/ /pubmed/34664495 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.127 Text en © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mukuru, Moses
Gorry, Jonathan
Kiwanuka, Suzanne N.
Gibson, Linda
Musoke, David
Ssengooba, Freddie
Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015
title Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015
title_full Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015
title_fullStr Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015
title_full_unstemmed Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015
title_short Designed to Fail? Revisiting Uganda’s Maternal Health Policies to Understand Policy Design Issues Underpinning Missed Targets for Reduction of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR): 2000-2015
title_sort designed to fail? revisiting uganda’s maternal health policies to understand policy design issues underpinning missed targets for reduction of maternal mortality ratio (mmr): 2000-2015
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9808297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34664495
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.127
work_keys_str_mv AT mukurumoses designedtofailrevisitingugandasmaternalhealthpoliciestounderstandpolicydesignissuesunderpinningmissedtargetsforreductionofmaternalmortalityratiommr20002015
AT gorryjonathan designedtofailrevisitingugandasmaternalhealthpoliciestounderstandpolicydesignissuesunderpinningmissedtargetsforreductionofmaternalmortalityratiommr20002015
AT kiwanukasuzannen designedtofailrevisitingugandasmaternalhealthpoliciestounderstandpolicydesignissuesunderpinningmissedtargetsforreductionofmaternalmortalityratiommr20002015
AT gibsonlinda designedtofailrevisitingugandasmaternalhealthpoliciestounderstandpolicydesignissuesunderpinningmissedtargetsforreductionofmaternalmortalityratiommr20002015
AT musokedavid designedtofailrevisitingugandasmaternalhealthpoliciestounderstandpolicydesignissuesunderpinningmissedtargetsforreductionofmaternalmortalityratiommr20002015
AT ssengoobafreddie designedtofailrevisitingugandasmaternalhealthpoliciestounderstandpolicydesignissuesunderpinningmissedtargetsforreductionofmaternalmortalityratiommr20002015